BenjaminBirdie
Banned
682: Great stuff. Won't do anything to staunch the flow of fanboy pus, but cements this is a definitely Morrison run on the book.
BenjaminBirdie said:Prep time is...Batman.
*shuffles papers into briefcase*
Look, I'll leave you guys to your disappointment. As someone who got enjoyment out of the story ultimately, I figure I came out on top anyways, as there's another thing in this bright and madcap world that is fun to me, and one less for you guys.
;D
bob_arctor said:BB, me and you pretty much always agree on these things, especially when it comes to Morrison generally. What did you think of Batman's son, in the black Batmobile with red lights, ramming the Joker the fuck off the road? Loved that. I thought the whole issue was really powerful to be honest and the last page was particularly touching--very sad actually. I'm still confused as to the meaning behind the trigger phrase--it even appears there at the end. Does it tie into Bruce's mention that children will sometimes develop a cover personality after suffering extreme trauma? Is that all Batman is, ultimately? I need to re-read the entire arc but perhaps you can also clear this up more definitively--who the hell was the Black Glove?? I take that he's apparently some sort of deranged doppelganger of Thomas Wayne?
bob_arctor said:BB, me and you pretty much always agree on these things, especially when it comes to Morrison generally. What did you think of Batman's son, in the black Batmobile with red lights, ramming the Joker the fuck off the road? Loved that. I thought the whole issue was really powerful to be honest and the last page was particularly touching--very sad actually. I'm still confused as to the meaning behind the trigger phrase--it even appears there at the end. Does it tie into Bruce's mention that children will sometimes develop a cover personality after suffering extreme trauma? Is that all Batman is, ultimately? I need to re-read the entire arc but perhaps you can also clear this up more definitively--who the hell was the Black Glove?? I take that he's apparently some sort of deranged doppelganger of Thomas Wayne?
BenjaminBirdie said:No idea, really. #666 seems to imply it's the devil himself.
I know at least two of them are real.krypt0nian said:One of those was real.
bob_arctor said:Yes, this is exactly how I interpreted it. Or at least the Devil inside Bruce. The Black Glove being his own as it punches through that helicopter windshield. And Blader, thanks for that--pretty obvious now when I think of what Thomas Wayne says there at the end.
What else I thought was dope: Bats' girl, or enemy, or whatever, Damian's mom, all up on the scene running shit like some old-school badass with the "I got this" vibe. Campy but in the good and funny way and she wasn't kidding at all (Jet in a jet! :lol )
In the end, I take "R.I.P." as not a story of Batman's death but a one of how perhaps Batman has figured out a way to cheat it entirely. He will never rest in peace, at least not for the duration. He will never allow himself to.
bob_arctor said:Is that all Batman is, ultimately?
diunxx said:unless I missed something.
ReconYoda said:Question: What was that at the end? Clayface? and why did it seem they were talking to it like it was bruce...im confused....
ToyMachine228 said:I'm starting to think that RIP is one big Final Crisis tie-in...That'd be an amazing twist. That the "attack on Bruce's mind" is the one that we see in Final Crisis #2 and in Batman #682.
benjipwns said:So, the stuff in #677...and the rest in Gordon's office? And Hurt's threat at the end in #681?The picture with Thomas, Martha, Pierce and Mayhew?
benjipwns said:Yeah, I don't want it a dream or the devil. I want it to beto justify the "biggest thing in seventy years" hype.Thomas Wayne
BenjaminBirdie said:You want a story development, not on the premise of what works, but on the premise of what was advertised?
No, I had assumed there was a relevancy to the statement and that the story had actually been planned out to justify the statement. Not that it was hyperbole to sell books when it's something silly and trivial like a dream or the devil. If theBenjaminBirdie said:You want a story development, not on the premise of what works, but on the premise of what was advertised?
ToyMachine228 said:Went back and read a few issues of RIP with the "Final Crisis tie-in theory" in mind, and it makes sense to me. Remember the scene where he's talking to the gargoyles and sees the green grids making up everything? Also, the "red and black", "red and black", "red and black". Seems to be all coming together for me.
LiveFromKyoto said:I don't think either of those things were connected to Final Crisis. What makes you think they are?
ToyMachine228 said:I'm asumming that what is happening in RIP is a vision, or half-conscious dream brought on by Darkseid's helmet/expirament that we see beginning in Final Crisis #2, and continuing in Batman #682. Bruce seeing the grids, could be a hint that he's "inside" this virtual world, and "red and black" are Darkseid's colors. There doesn't seem to be much of a reason for Joker repeating "red and black" so many times just to emphasize the colors of the roses.
Father_Brain said:I'm already pretty much convinced that Morrison was full of shit when he gave that "70 years" quote. Unless he really did have Thomas Wayne in mind, in which case it's probably for the best that it was left ambiguous.
favouriteflavour said:Didn't Morrison say RIP is before Final Crisis? If thats true then RIP being a vision in Darkseids machine doesn't make sense.
ToyMachine228 said:He has said that, but I also don't know if going by what Morrison said in an interview is a good idea. Could be misdirection. Or it might not be. Who knows. We've got one more issue of Batman in two weeks and then Final Crisis #6 before all this comes to a head, and then the fallout begins.
Lets talk about Batman. Something that came up in a lot of the commentary and criticism of Batman R.I.P. is that the storyline was built and built and built Grant himself made pronouncements about it at the New York Comic Con as being one of the most definition stories for Batman. And then at the end of R.I.P., we get a death scene that we have seen before no body, and a question mark as to what even happened. To me, this seems like it was a case where the hype, or peoples expectations overtook the storys ability to deliver...
DD: Heres the conundrum on this one. And this is reflective of the world that we live in now the world of collected editions. The R.I.P. story was always meant to play through to the end of Final Crisis - always. The thing is, we had to come up with a very complete story in Batman R.I.P. as it existed in its title. The reality is that the Batman R.I.P. story does not conclude until Final Crisis #6. There are also issues #682 and #683 of Batman that feed directly into Final Crisis #6, and well have a big finale to the Batman storyline. Thats how it plays out.
But as I said, because we live in the world of collected editions, we needed a conclusion in the Batman series, so that we could collect it properly within Batman, without having to bring in segments of Final Crisis to complete the story.
NRAMA: So fundamentally, Batman R.I.P did not end in Batman #681?
DD: Correct. We have the two parts that were in the middle of now, and they lead us into Final Crisis #6 which gives us a definite conclusion to the Batman story. Thats how Grant designed the story from the start, and thats how the story plays out. So, the people who are looking for the big finale, the stuff that Grant was talking about he knows how big an ending he has, because he wrote it in Final Crisis #6. That story has been so planned out that it reflects events from the pages of Final Crisis #1 in order to pull it all together.
So the Batman story has been hinted at in Final Crisis #1 - we couldnt allude to it, because we didnt want to play our hand too early with that. The fascinating thing about what Grant has done is that hes telling a major story in the life of Batman while hes telling a major event across the DC Universe with Final Crisis. And the two are linked.
NRAMA: So Final Crisis #6 is like when youre driving on, say, I-40 and it merges with another for a while, and you get the road signs telling you that youre on two highways at the same time...and you follow another highway out other than the one you went in on.
DD: Exactly. And Batman #682 and #683 are reflective of things that took place earlier in Final Crisis as well.
Fatghost said:I think if it had been Thomas Wayne that would have been a much more satisfying ending to RIP than what we got.
Ephemeris said:
ToyMachine228 said:Yeah, I think fans are upset because the actual comic series "Batman RIP" didn't end the way they wanted it too. But I think Final Crisis #6 will give us that ending. It's just a shame the actual arc by the name of "Batman RIP" seems to have a misleading title.
Skittleguy said:Sowho's grave were they digging up in the latest Nightwing?
ToyMachine228 said:Yeah, they never say for sure, but I think we are to assume that it wasBruce's grave. My guess is that there isn't even a real body in there, even though Superman was talking about messing with the bodies...Even though you'd think that Superman can see through the coffin with X-Ray Vision...So, I'm not sure really.