• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Batman v Superman Ultimate Cut |OT| - Men are still good (out now)

Veelk

Banned
No one is stopping you, which is the great thing about critical analysis. It's why the transformers are some of my favorite films now.
The room is one of my favorite films ever as well lol, seen it 5 times in the theater.

Well, then by your admission, BvS is not a remarkable film. No film is remarkable, because a remarkable film is incapable of existing on it's own within this framework. You can make these kinds of leaps from any of them. So at this point, it's no longer about the movies themselves, but only what any individual (in this case, you) decides to make of them. BvS doesn't ask any questions that any other movie doesn't ask, you just choose to see those questions in some movies, not in others. It's not the film, it's you.
 

atr0cious

Member
Except he literally equates Lois with the rest of the world, meaning he's not choosing between the two. He dies for Lois as much as for the world. While noble, it absolutely circumvents the initial dilemma of having to choose between the two. The truth is the movie simply does not care about the questions posed in the first half once Superman is forced to fight Batman. That's also why the third act feels so disassociated with the rest of the movie.
"My world doesn't exist anymore." He's choosing to be superman to save the world(her) which means he's no longer going to be with her. He has to choose goodhis role, lover or savior. It's not a cop out, it's a function of their relationship. And you're still taking his choice for granted, which is why America burys him as a soldier, he's supposed to die for us.
 

guek

Banned
"My world doesn't exist anymore." He's choosing to be superman to save the world(her) which means he's no longer going to be with her. He has to choose goodhis role, lover or savior. It's not a cop out, it's a function of their relationship. And you're still taking his choice for granted, which is why America burys him as a soldier, he's supposed to die for us.

Except he CAN'T choose between the two, because it's an all or nothing dilemma. He literally cannot choose the world over Lois or Lois over the world in that case, either he chooses both or everyone dies. I'm not taking his choice to die for granted, it's just that the question he faces is fundamentally different from the one presented in the bathtub scene.
 

benjipwns

Banned
No one is stopping you, which is the great thing about critical analysis. It's why the transformers are some of my favorite films now.
The Decepticons are, in this series at least, the actual champions of the working class. Optimus may drape himself shiny trucker clothes, but that's a farce akin to Romney visiting a small-town factory on the campaign trail. Where the other imagery of Decepticon monstrousity had mostly to do with their race or gender, Devastator is a monstrous vision of the workers united.

Of course, the race and gender aspect is still a part of it: Devastator is hunched like an ape, and features a massive vagina-dentata mouth, in the tradition of Predator. But check the middle of Devastator's transformation sequence: one of his hands walks around on its own, before joining with the body. There are a ton of horror movies where the hand revolts against the mind, as in District 9 - with obvious connotations. Here, though, Devastator's body is entirely "hands". This isn't imagery of lost agency, but of communion. The workers literally unite as a single entity.

I would actually argue that Devastator didn't "fail to kill" Skids (or Mudflap, whichever). I choose to believe that he spared them.

The specific means by which Devastator is eventually killed present a very important contrast, so keep an eye out for that
woah fam
 

atr0cious

Member
Well, then by your admission, BvS is not a remarkable film. No film is remarkable, because a remarkable film is incapable of existing on it's own within this framework.
If you meant this literally, no this is never true. Even figuratively, you can see outside works influence and extrapolate, like the watchmen and mos/bvs. Like how the world's end is the 12 step program for alcoholics, but also a statement on the generation after the baby boomers trying to find their place in the world.

And who gives a fuck about some label of what a movie is? The Room has more heart and soul in it than all of the mcu, doesn't make it a good movie.
 

Veelk

Banned
Guek, you are either brave or foolish, but I commend you for continuing the debate. I only lasted 2 replies before I nope-ing out. The mental gymnastics are too much for me.
 

atr0cious

Member
Except he CAN'T choose between the two, because it's an all or nothing dilemma. He literally cannot choose the world over Lois or Lois over the world in that case, either he chooses both or everyone dies. I'm not taking his choice to die for granted, it's just that the question he faces is fundamentally different from the one presented in the bathtub scene.
He knows he's going to die. He's choosing the role of savior of Lois instead of the lover of lois. Remember Dr Manhattan was choosing to save the world in his renewable energy project with Veidt, instead of fucking Laurie wholeheartedly. He even says he's giving her his attention, but he's talking to Veidt at the same time.
I would credit even Snyder with more rationality though. I mean, he's pretentious in his own way, but Atr0cious is next level navalgazing.
Thanks for reminding me why I usually don't talk film in gaf.
 
the only choice to be made in the bath tub scene is if flooding the apartment is worth getting some

Imagine Superman getting some. Snyder would probably be like "you know, the aesthetic needs consequences. I mean, he's a Kryptonian and she's a human, so they should never be able to reproduce. Oh I know, let's have him thrust into sonic booms, and have Lois's pelvis break! Perfect!"
 

guek

Banned
Guek, you are either brave or foolish, but I commend you for continuing the debate. I only lasted 2 replies before I nope-ing out. The mental gymnastics are too much for me.

lol, yeah, I think I'm about done.

hTJdP5l.png

fixed
 
The UC is one of my favorite super hero movies either...its balsy as hell in its portrayals of the heroes or its a fundamental misunderstanding of them on Snyder's part...I just don't fucking know but I liked it a lot more...and it really feels like an old school narrative in 3 acts. The theatrical cut is borderline unwatchable due to the incoherence from yanked out plot lines. That said its not a crowd pleaser by any means and I still feel like it would have bombed at the box office at 3 hours in length unless critics actually impact ticket sales and would have liked it?
 

benjipwns

Banned
Imagine Superman getting some. Snyder would probably be like "you know, the aesthetic needs consequences. I mean, he's a Kryptonian and she's a human, so they should never be able to reproduce. Oh I know, let's have him thrust into sonic booms, and have Lois's pelvis break! Perfect!"
One of the issues of the comics showed the after effects of this on Lois' spine:
fL0MMiT.png
 
And I don't care if you think I'm being pretentious, this film asks more questions than a typical blockbuster and I find it extremely fascinating. Film analysis is all about finding "bigger existential" meanings, especially in a film where a man prays to the "creator of heaven and earth" while laser beam eyes destroy the building he's standing in.

tumblr_m3k8s8U24R1qcdg4no1_1280.jpg


Seriously though, the pretentious posturing in here is getting embarrassing.
 

atr0cious

Member
I'm sorry, but you do know the director of this is Zack Fucking Snyder, correct? His artistic genius always provides a deeper meaning, and I demand you navalgaze it to us.
It's funny you claimed to like critically analyzing, but are so unaware of what it actually is, you're shitposting short replies instead of all that verbosity you were pushing earlier when you were pretending to be so knowledgeable.

And if you folks think I'm being pretentious, I'm like the baseball Michael Jordan of analysis, you ain't seen nothing.
 

User1608

Banned
Honestly, I don't see the movie being that ripe for such analysis. It's a pretty cynical take, and a bit ugly even (not the visuals per se, it's very well shot) but I enjoyed it for what it was.
 

Veelk

Banned
Hmm drawing a blank in MCU quotes..

"This drink... I like it! *Smash* ANOTHER!"

"I understood that reference"

"On your left"

Just off the top of my head. Those made it as memes for a temporary time, but they all lack the staying power of some of the DC's stuff.

Then again, I don't really know what makes something quotable. Like, I have no idea why the entire conversation Bane had with the CIA guy is so embedded into everyone's memory. It's not typical, but it's not super unusual, or super funny, or....idk, it's just a normal movie quote, but everyone remembers the Bane-CIA dude conversation.

Edit:
or perhaps he's wondering why someone would shoot a man before throwing him out of a plane?

Yeah, exactly this. Why is this line so quotable?
 

guek

Banned
It's funny you claimed to like critically analyzing, but are so unaware of what it actually is, you're shitposting short replies instead of all that verbosity you were pushing earlier when you were pretending to be so knowledgeable.

And if you folks think I'm being pretentious, I'm like the baseball Michael Jordan of analysis, you ain't seen nothing.

Your problem isn't pretension, it's arrogance.
 

benjipwns

Banned
it's so self-serious, and Mayor Carcetti does the fake shooting of the guy by the door just so Bane can say that specific line and then they can setup the line about crashing the plane

with no survivors
 

atr0cious

Member
Your problem isn't pretension, it's arrogance.
Arrogance? I've been attacked from the get, for being "pretentious" because I'd like to talk about more than mere plot points and whether I liked it or not, and I'm the arrogant one? The anti-intellectual posts of reaching and what not don't help either, specifically when most of them were more concerned with my character. You did attempt dialogue, but seem to be getting salty because I disagreed with your reading of the film.
 
Still pissed Nolan redid all of the prologue dialogue after everyone bitched about it, but left the rest of the movie untouched. So damn jarring.
 

Veelk

Banned
I bet Nolan movies taught you that films mean something, that the narrative does things for a reason. BvS taught me a different lesson, making no sense at all ... They taught me a movie only makes sense if you force it to.
 
I bet Nolan movies taught you that films mean something, that the narrative does things for a reason. BvS taught me a different lesson, making no sense at all ... They taught me a movie only makes sense if you force it to.

AF9jieo.gif


Hahaha, that's great. That is peak Batman-GAF quoting.
 
Top Bottom