• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Batman v Superman Ultimate Cut |OT| - Men are still good (out now)

benjipwns

Banned
I bet Nolan movies taught you that films mean something, that the narrative does things for a reason. BvS taught me a different lesson, making no sense at all ... They taught me a movie only makes sense if you force it to.
Never rub another man's rhubarb.
 
Arrogance? I've been attacked from the get, for being "pretentious" because I'd like to talk about more than mere plot points and whether I liked it or not, and I'm the arrogant one? The anti-intellectual posts of reaching and what not don't help either, specifically when most of them were more concerned with my character. You did attempt dialogue, but seem to be getting salty because I disagreed with your reading of the film.

Your problem isn't pretension, it's arrogance.

Nobody cares about guek taking on atr0cious.
 

benjipwns

Banned
Now you know the problem was... WB's execs got sloppy. You know? Crazy. They started to lose it. They had a head full of bad wiring, I guess. Couldn't keep it straight up here. They were the kind of company who couldn't hear the train until it was 2 feet from them.
 

KalBalboa

Banned
Watched some of the new material tonight.

Seems like the cut pieces with Clark would've done the movie some real good. It still isn't exactly a masterpiece but I can see the full scope of the movie better, that's for sure.

Maybe I'll sit through the full three hours in July sometime.
 

Dalek

Member
You should really check out watchman director's cut if you haven't. It has a lot of similar shots and scenarios that are reused in both MoS and BvS, especially if you want to understand more of Snyder's perspective and visual language.

giphy.gif
 
Man I can't wait for the post on the philosophical ramifications of the Doomsday battle I couldn't make out behind all the special effects!
 

Veelk

Banned

Atr0cious: "BvS is Snyder's perspective and Snyder's perspective is a visual language, and I am... no. Um, no. What am I? What was I saying? The bittersweet pain among men is seeing visual language without Snyder's perspective because... because that is *paradoxical* and, um... thank you for coming."
 

Dalek

Member
Atr0cious: BvS is Snyder's perspective and Snyder's perspective is a visual language, and I am... no. Um, no. What am I? What was I saying? The bittersweet pain among men is seeing visual language without Snyder's perspective because... because that is *paradoxical* and, um... thank you for coming.

If I understand correctly, the fire that emits from the final battle-surrounding the chaotic fight- symbolizes the fire inside Clark that burns-the pain that he shuts inside from being rejected from this world-but in the end he lets himself be consumed by the flames and offers himself up to the world-much like the heroes of old.
 
http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2016/03/21/zack-snyder-on-how-batman-v-superman-is-like-watchmen/

I know right. But you're right, I should stop trying to talk about film on gaf. Now, no one who's gets to read my write up on civil war: "capitalism vs libertarianism."

Snyder was mystified when someone told him that they couldn’t think of a movie in recent memory that’s had as much collateral damage as “Man of Steel.” “I went, really? And I said, well, what about ['Star Wars: The Force Awakens']?” the director says. “In ‘Star Wars’ they destroy five planets with billions of people on them. That’s gotta be one of the highest death toll movies in history, the new ‘Star Wars’ movie, if you just do the math.”

I'd point at Zach Snyder, in this very article, not understanding the difference between villains blowing up planets and the massive collateral damage the hero creates themself as pretty damaging to the theory Snyder put thought into his imagery or storytelling.

Also, I legit have no idea if the Civil War write up thing is a joke or not.
 
Yea, I tend not to agree with his analytics but there's a line between voicing your disagreement and belittling. You guys are on the wrong side of the line or coming very close now.

That's how it starts, Icon. The fever, the rage, the feeling of powerlessness that turns good men... cruel.
 

IconGrist

Member
I'd point at Zach Snyder, in this very article, not understanding the difference between villains blowing up planets and the massive collateral damage the hero themselves creates as pretty damaging to the theory Snyder put thought into his imagery or storytelling.

Also, I legit have no idea if the Civil War write up thing is a joke or not.

Find me in that quote where it talks about heroes specifically causing collateral damage and your argument holds water. Did he? Or is that some specific thing people made up?
 

Dalek

Member
Thirteen pages in the BvS thread, Icon; we've seen what critical analyses are worth. How many good guys are left? How many stayed that way?

You don't owe this thread a thing.

"Perspective" and "visual language" are legitimate things in film, yes. No reaction image is going to shift the dunce cap from your head to the others'.

Atr0cious is 100% right: NeoGAF is downright hostile to actually discussing movies.

This is hilarious.
 

benjipwns

Banned
Actually, that quote is pretty awesome considering he probably literally ordered KGBeast to use a flamethrower on Martha, Martha, Martha.
 

Veelk

Banned
The thread is going to get locked if this keeps up, lol.

Well, I don't know about you, but I feel I've covered more or less everything I wanted to cover on BvS.

Maybe a discussion on the hyper/toxic masculinity themes with the film...but I feel less bothered by the UC, since it included more women in more significant and better done active roles, so even if it's depictions are still somewhat problematic, its an improvement over the TC. Besides, that, of all topics, is not one that's fun. People get defensive just out of habit and I feel it's a topic that's just more exhausting to discuss. If Atr0cious decided to argue against it, I'd feel it would be more important to push back against him in this case. The most visible issues, specifically how Batman and Superman interact, were covered on my post about their fight anyway. So I don't think it's a necessary thing to engage.

Other than that, I've said more or less all I need to say on the movie. If you have a talking point you want to discuss on the movie, feel free. All I got left is memes.
 

guek

Banned
"Perspective" and "visual language" are legitimate things in film, yes. No reaction image is going to shift the dunce cap from your head to the others'.

Atr0cious is 100% right: NeoGAF is downright hostile to actually discussing movies.

gaf isn't the best place to discuss film but this thread hasn't been hostile for the reasons Atr0cious thinks.

Zack Snyder is really not a director worth dying on a hill for.
 

kevin1025

Banned
I figured I'd never watch the movie again, and then I thought I'd give the ultimate cut a shot. It's still incredibly disappointing, though the additional stuff does add something to the movie. But as someone who always wanted it to be about Batman versus Superman (go figure, given the title), I'll never really go back to it. Outside of being a very visually striking movie, there's not enough interesting things to spend more time on it.
 
Top Bottom