SUBZERO-08
Member
The dialogue in mp is pretty funny.
One of my favs: "I'm getting my shit pushed in over here!"
"Get a load of this you assholes! ARRRRGGHHHH!" is my personal favorite.
The dialogue in mp is pretty funny.
One of my favs: "I'm getting my shit pushed in over here!"
Dear DICE: Automatic landing gear is the dumbest idea in BF3. Please remove it. Thanks.
Yeah, this is my position on the IRNV. It's too slow with sway to really work with a fast playstyle. It's very useful when you're running something slower and need to scan for enemies on your way between objectives (Caspian Conquest and most rush maps comes to mind), but on a more mobile level, on maps like Norshar Canals and Grand Bazaar, speed of sight and peripheral vision is much more paramount.It's great if you're planning on staying still for a long time. Not so great for run and gun type of game play. I keep moving from flag to flag so I don't really like it. There's a 1 second fade to back and you get the limited view. I much rather go with HOLO
He's the biggest thing about support weapons: you need to be constantly aware of bipod mountable surfaces. When moving into firing position, look for a place where you'll have enough time to set up the bipod and open fire before you're fired upon, which means that you'll have to think to where the enemy is going to be in a second an not where they actually are. Being in a supported position, the m249 is a damned laser gun and can really cut into ranks of infantry rushing to your position. Keep up sustained fire as long as the enemy is visible, and you'll suppress them into making the kill much easier. Basically, you've got to shoot like you have 100 rounds on the belt and can always replenish. Don't worry about accuracy, spray man, spray!Ugh, going back a gun without IRNV sucks. I hate using IRNV, but you put yourself at such a disadvantage when you don't.
Anyways, what's the consensus on the M249 (Support weapon)? Can seem to do jack shit with it, but maybe I just need to get used to it some more. I adore the RPK and M27, but I struggle with this gun. It has a huge magazine, but the reload time sucks. Maybe I should just skip it.
Bipods are kinda awkward for LMGs when you're in a prone position. I have to face the floor just to get the guy to set up the bipod instead of just aiming straight where I want to fire and have him setup the bipod automatically.
Dear DICE: Automatic landing gear is the dumbest idea in BF3. Please remove it. Thanks.
anyone having issues with re-binding certain keys? i can't seem to change "throttle down", it's always stuck in S, i really hate unable to slow my jet down, this is a bug right? i already changed the key to something else yet it doesn't work.
I just wish there was a button to manually bring it back up. I hate it when I get shot out of the sky because I can't get any fucking speed or altitude because my damned landing gear went down after that very low pull out.
quoting myself, anyone having this issue in PC version? try rebinding your "Throttle Down" key to something else it won't change.
same goes for Spotting with Q, it's fixed dead to the key.
Yes there are glitches with binding keys. I can't bind middle mouse button for example. Resetting everything seems to fix it but it kinda sucks to rebind everything again.
you mean resetting to default? after that you can bind Spotting or Throttle Down to something else?
so far these are the only 2 keys i know of that's fixed and can't ever be changed.
I don't find it difficult to 'run and gun' with the IRNV at all.
In fact, I'm pretty sure it makes it easier.
"Get a load of this you assholes! ARRRRGGHHHH!" is my personal favorite.
I don't find it difficult to 'run and gun' with the IRNV at all.
In fact, I'm pretty sure it makes it easier.
You can land the jets!? Or are you talking about "once you're off, you're up in the air forever?" Because that's always how it's been in BF isn't it?
Also I can't seem to land helicopters on even ground anymore. I can line up and be "even" on the tilt and slightly even on the nose-up/down indicators and somehow my helicopter will teeter-totter over and nearly kill me and passangers at times. WTF, landing the Blackhawk and Apache in BC2 on even/flat grassy ground wasn't this fucking hard in first person. :/
I don't understand why the ability to land is in the game to begin with. There is no safe spot to land where an enemy jet isn't going to just strafe you and even if you successfully land and repair your jet, there aren't many places where you can safely take off again either.
It's so goddamned pointless. It's like it only exists so you have to remember to not lower your speed too much while flying low or else you become a sitting duck.
I dunno, soooo many people just leave you when you're disabled, and it's nice when you're hit cause of AA.
Yeah running and gunning with IRNV is way easier. It's safer to move into your position and once you're there you can basically scope and do a sweep and locate all the enemy positions. Hell, it'll even autospot some of them for your teammates.
Anyways, what's the consensus on the M249 (Support weapon)? Can seem to do jack shit with it, but maybe I just need to get used to it some more. I adore the RPK and M27, but I struggle with this gun. It has a huge magazine, but the reload time sucks. Maybe I should just skip it.
Almost positive every time it happens. I think I have some footage of it happening to me, as well.
Could just be some latency thing where I get shot by someone else at the same time.
Man fuck this game
Every server is becoming instant vehicle spawns and 20% spawn time and 10% man down time and THEN add 1000-1400 tickets with 64 players.
1000+ ticket servers are fun but not with instant vehicles and respawn times.
Fuck this generation...why the hell does everything have to be INSTANT?!
Sheesh, it's pissing me off
And everybody in here is talking about the IRNV like it's the only "gun" in the game. Everybody's trying to learn the IRNV....psh
I hate that attachment and they should just get rid of it altogether. There arent any nighttime maps so whats the need for it? I wish things could just go back
to that awesome experience I had in the alpha where I couldnt get enough of the game. Now it's just BC2.5 and this is coming from someone who said
that "This is BF3, not BC3" when I played the alpha. Now everybody's back to running around and rambo'ing and shit and prone is freakin useless now.
Takes forever and a day just to stand up out of prone and they might as well reduce health to COD levels because the netcode is so shitty that it feels like you're
dying instantly.
Really hating this game now.
Think I may have found a bug with destroying equipment.
When I destroy a MAV or Radio Beacon etc etc I get 20 points. But I have noticed a few times ive damaged the equipment, and then someone else kills it I get way more. Like it uses the same calculation given for hurting an enemy. I just got 91 points before..and I swear its happened before.
Was just about to post about this. It's stupid that you get more points for vehicle destroy assist rather than just destroying the damn equipment.
Think I may have found a bug with destroying equipment.
When I destroy a MAV or Radio Beacon etc etc I get 20 points. But I have noticed a few times ive damaged the equipment, and then someone else kills it I get way more. Like it uses the same calculation given for hurting an enemy. I just got 91 points before..and I swear its happened before.
Was just about to post about this. It's stupid that you get more points for vehicle destroy assist rather than just destroying the damn equipment.
Weren't they already? We saw the Raptor on the first trailer on Oman.
These trailers are so amazing
Man fuck this game
Every server is becoming instant vehicle spawns and 20% spawn time and 10% man down time and THEN add 1000-1400 tickets with 64 players.
1000+ ticket servers are fun but not with instant vehicles and respawn times.
Fuck this generation...why the hell does everything have to be INSTANT?!
Sheesh, it's pissing me off
And everybody in here is talking about the IRNV like it's the only "gun" in the game. Everybody's trying to learn the IRNV....psh
I hate that attachment and they should just get rid of it altogether. There arent any nighttime maps so whats the need for it? I wish things could just go back
to that awesome experience I had in the alpha where I couldnt get enough of the game. Now it's just BC2.5 and this is coming from someone who said
that "This is BF3, not BC3" when I played the alpha. Now everybody's back to running around and rambo'ing and shit and prone is freakin useless now.
Takes forever and a day just to stand up out of prone and they might as well reduce health to COD levels because the netcode is so shitty that it feels like you're
dying instantly.
Really hating this game now.
"I wanted to complement what we already have in the base game, plus I wanted to bring back some of the classic vehicles from Battlefield 2 that we know players loved, such as the Short Take-Off/Vertical Landing fighter jet and the desert buggy. In today’s trailer, you can also get a first glimpse of a hitherto unannounced fourth vehicle bound to strike fear into the very hearts of the enemy. See if you can spot it!", said Back to Karkand Lead Designer Niklas Fegraeus.
Man fuck this game
Every server is becoming instant vehicle spawns and 20% spawn time and 10% man down time and THEN add 1000-1400 tickets with 64 players.
they might as well reduce health to COD levels because the netcode is so shitty that it feels like you're dying instantly.
Bipods are kinda awkward for LMGs when you're in a prone position. I have to face the floor just to get the guy to set up the bipod instead of just aiming straight where I want to fire and have him setup the bipod automatically.
Stopped by the BF board at Gamefaqs, a shitload of crying about the USAS.
This post. It is good.My opinion on IRNV from the PC BF3 thread:
A completely unreasonable line of reasoning, Scogoth. Why have different camos at all if the only one that matters is the spec ops camo because that's the only one that affects the scope that everyone is using. And why offer any kind of environmental camouflage (i.e. bushes/grass/leaves) if it'll be more of hindrance to the guy using it for cover than the guy with an IRNV that can see right through it no problem?
Don't get me wrong I use the IRNV on every gun, but that's just the point, isn't it - why should I feel obligated to put an IRNV on literally everything? The scope as it stands is essentially legitimized hacks. It lights up players like Christmas lights in any lighting condition with any camo (pretty much even the spec ops camo too) in any environmental backdrop at any range. The thing is an enormous crutch that does the game no favors. If anything it drastically lowers the real skill potential as it makes identifying and engaging targets an elementary task (in turn marginalizing the usefulness of things like the flash suppressor and silencer, since the scope pretty much turns your body into a constant muzzle flash).
Do you need to use it? No probably not. But it provides such a definite advantage in practical applicability over other scopes for such an enormous amount of circumstances that you're kneecapping yourself overall if you don't use it. I can't count how many times I've said to myself "Jesus there is no way I would have seen that guy without this," be it dark corners or camo in a field. I don't think that's a particularly good thing.
Also tact flashlights are brighter than the sun on every level featuring the sun. That's a problem. And for as bright as the flashlights appear to other players they do an absolutely terrible job at actually lighting things up. They look like one of those single AA battery keychain lights from the wielder's perspective. So basically they just exist to create an enormously unrealistic bloom effect for anyone you point it at. And that's just bad design.