are some of you seriously defending a woman using leg shit and a wheelchair when she doesnt need any of it
this seems EXTREMELY insulting to actual disabled people
What is a better term? Cognitively misconditioned?
How is gender a social construct? Physically there's either male or female.
CrimzonSamurai said:That's biological sex bruh. Gender is different. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong here, but pretty sure "gender" means the social roles/treatments people take on/receive based on their biological sex.
That's why it's "transgender" and no longer "transsexual" because people can't change their chromosomes.
Like I said, someone can correct me if I messed that up.
i saw a mentally ill dude once and i called him dipshit lol
Yup, that sure sounds like Munchhausen's.what a goddamn dipshit
are some of you seriously defending a woman using leg shit and a wheelchair when she doesnt need any of it
I wonder if people who were arguing against the right to take your own life would do an instant 180 on it if it was called like, "transkillin" instead of suicide
defending her as in "she needs help" is totally fine by me, cause good lord she does
I must've crossed a line. Sorry.
There already was discussion about how much of an advantage Oscar Pistorious might have with his artificial legs. Though I agree that when it's about actually replacing a limb, meaning that you actually having feeling in it etc., that's very far off, if ever.We are literally millions of years away from this technology. Maybe even centuries.
Obviously depends on the reasons for doing so. If it stems from "those legs are not my own" likely yes. If it comes from "those legs are better than organic ones" maybe not.Out of curiosity. If I was Bill Gates rich and I elected to have my legs removed to have robotics put in, would people in this thread classify me as 'insane'?
Do you really think people that have this mental health condition do it on purpose just to insult physically disabled people?
You have a really funny way of expressing that. But I guess I'm tilting at windmills, internet will be internet.
no but I'd be pretty pissed if my legs were legitimately disabled and I saw those people with perfectly fine legs wasting theirs.
BTW this thread illustrates perfectly why the mentally ill get such bad treatment. People have huge trouble grasping these things rationally. Instead they prefer to jump between considering the ill person's actions impaired and unimpaired depending on what their primitive reactions dredge up.
no but I'd be pretty pissed if my legs were legitimately disabled and I saw those people with perfectly fine legs wasting theirs.
Well, physically this isn't even accurate. Sex exists as a continuum rather than a binary, and biologists acknowledge this.
Gender identity refers to someone's sexual identity in their own mind - for instance, a female-bodied person who identifies as male has a female sex but a male gender. Gender identity is something that does not always match the sex of the body (although it usually does). There is evidence suggesting that gender identity also has its own biological/neurological basis (ie. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18980961).
You're thinking of gender roles, rather than gender identity. The way gender identity manifests is sometimes called "gender expression" (which can depend a lot on culture - like wearing skirts, suits, makeup, particular hairstyles, etc). As for transgender vs transsexual, transgender is more of an umbrella term, while transsexual (an older term) refers to people who identify as the opposite sex to what they were assigned at birth and wish to live/be identified as such.
Obviously depends on the reasons for doing so. If it stems from "those legs are not my own" likely yes. If it comes from "those legs are better than organic ones" maybe not.
Do you really think people that have this mental health condition do it on purpose just to insult physically disabled people?
why? im intepreting the thing in a way in which she is either mentally disabled or a dipshit. if she's a dipshit, she's a dipshit, if she is mentally disabled then by all means help her asap
Even some societies have more than 2 genders.
She wants to sever her spine, so take a wild guess which one it is. But I admit finding that out would require putting in some effort, much like punctuation and capitalization.
Does someone have to do something intentionally for you to be offended by it?
No, that's not what I meant by what a mental illness is, which is why I actually brought up homosexuality and paedophilia. Both are sexual preferences diverging from the norm. The difference is, there's no harm to society and/or other people if gay/lesbian people live out their differing sexual preferences, whereas there very much is with paedophilia. The difference isn't whether there's a cure, the difference is whether it's harmful to society, other people or one self.
Of course, there are many nuances to it. Firstly, "disabled by choice" sounds very different to what, e.g., Amir0x cited here. Okay, you "choose" to lose a limb instead of having it removed by chance / an accident, but the examples sound more like something you have to do to be able to live. That's completely different to simply "preferring" having a limb less or something to that effect.
Also, I'm usually very much in favour of people being the masters over their own body. I'm just having a hard time simply being okay with people wanting to mutilate themselves; very few people may have a need to do this, but if that's just okay then why even try to, yes, cure people who try to harm themselves in much less severe ways (e.g., cutting themselves)? Or saying being obese is bad for you? Or trying to cure anorexia? Etc. pp.
I'm offended by the ebola virus. What a dipshit.
Why get offended over something that is being carried out by a person with a mental health issue? It quite clearly not their fault they feel this way and they need help.
are some of you seriously defending a woman using leg shit and a wheelchair when she doesnt need any of it
Ah ok, I gotcha. One of my friends who's slightly more socially in-tune than I told me nobody used "transsexual" anymore and that it was offensive, but maybe she was wrong lol. Anyway, thanks for the clarification. The nuances get tangled up in my brain.
Eh, I don't think carte blanche works here. Maybe it depends on the severity of the mental illness. My depression had me acting like a real asshole to a lot of people, I don't expect them to forgive me for it just because it was symptomatic of my illness. I also wouldn't think they were worse people for being offended by my behavior.
But I mean what role that third gender plays in a society. Some of the examples given there are just ridiculous (sterile woman, demons...), just because someone said that was a third gender it doesn't mean it's true. In fact, it seems offensive to me in some cases as in "you are not a real woman because you can't have children, you're worthless".
How about be glad that you at least have an intact mind?
I must've crossed a line. Sorry.
BTW this thread illustrates perfectly why the mentally ill get such bad treatment. People have huge trouble grasping these things rationally. Instead they prefer to jump between considering the ill person's actions impaired and unimpaired depending on what their primitive reactions dredge up.
No worries.It's also a person-by-person thing too - though the way I described the use of the term "transsexual" is accurate, there are a few people who don't like it (because it's an older word and has its roots in medical usage).
TBH when talking about transgender issues I pretty much just tend to say "trans" by default, and if someone tells me they want to be identified as something in particular then I comply with their wishes.
I didn't say anything about just accepting it (or in your case forgiving you). But I would hope people would think that person clearly has a mental health issue and needs help. Instead of fuck that person making themself disabled.
What the hell is insulting about this?
How is this even a constructive argument. Come on.