Alright, what about: Dunno if this changed from Super to Ultra:
(Corner Only) 6+MP, 2LP, 214+HP (Criminal Upper), 214(214?)+MP/HP(EX Criminal Upper)?
It's the finger contorting of changing directions really quickly and on the fly that kills combos for most people.
I mean hell: Ivy's Calamity Symphony which is (IIRC) 28284666B+G throws a lot of people off. I think this is "dumbed down" in Soul Calibur 5 because I remember looking at Ivy's movelist in Soul Calibur 2 which was like 1937461826 (exaggerating) and then B+G and I'm like "Yeah, no. Not the character or game for me."
People bad at fighting games giving advice to other people bad at fighting games.
#Neogaf
I'm pretty good in Smash, ok in Soul Calibur but pretty bad at everything else.
Those that struggle at fighting games:
What do you think it is that stops you from being good? What holds you back? What don't you understand, or what can't you do?
I bet all the folks claiming you need inborn talent to excel at fighting games would get stomped by Brolylegs:
Interview w/ Broly, Disabled Super Street Fighter : https://youtu.be/83nSodg-HTU
90% of my matches on MKX have been relatively lag free, and I dont have trouble doing most combos. I have a ps4, using a hardwired connection, what are you guys usingMy advice would be to drop mkx is you want to enjoy fighting games, that game online is just horrible experience, .
When I picked up Super Street Fighter 4 I couldn't beat the AI on medium. I then hopped online, got wrecked. Kept playing. Kept playing. Kept playing. Eventually I started winning and got good enough to play in tournaments and do pretty well.
It just takes a lot of time. Like, a LOT of time. You have to really want to get good at fighting games to get good at fighting games. If you don't enjoy the game even while losing, you're probably not the type of person who will get good at fighters.
I don't blame you. I'm still struggling with MKX and enjoying the process of getting incrementally better but the second it stopped being fun I'd stop playing. Frankly I can say right now that I don't have the time or the commitment to become competitive beyond the lower echelons in the genre, and I'm content with that.I ended up selling the game.
I thank everyone for all the advice but it actually turned me away from the genre. It's just too much to learn and take in, and I'd rather spend my time elsewhere.
Maybe I'll try again with the next SF.
I ended up selling the game.
I thank everyone for all the advice but it actually turned me away from the genre. It's just too much to learn and take in, and I'd rather spend my time elsewhere.
Maybe I'll try again with the next SF.
That's terrible.
Why?
I see nothing wrong with not wanting to jump in deeper into the genre when most of the replies in this thread are saying that you have to put in a ton of time to get good at the games. Not everyone is looking to spend a majority of their gaming time on just one genre/game.
Simply put, if anyone is looking to get exceptional at this genre, but are not looking to spend MMO like time in doing so, then either it isn't for them, or they need to readjust their expectations for it.
I bet all the folks claiming you need inborn talent to excel at fighting games would get stomped by Brolylegs:
Interview w/ Broly, Disabled Super Street Fighter : https://youtu.be/83nSodg-HTU
No, but I also don't study astrophysics. If I did, I could do what he does.Inborn talent can be mental as well.
Look at Stephen Hawking. Can you do what he does?
Not all practice is effective practice. You can spend months in training mode and learn nothing. You can play a thousand matches and suck. Learning how to learn is something many people don't know how to do. It isn't natural talent, though. I am a great problem solver because my Dad taught me how to solve problems, and I played competitive chess for years. I honed those skills. I didn't become a great analytic reader until I was 28, but it did happen because I wanted it to. There are some things I still can't do that I will eventually accomplish, like learning a foreign language.It's not about inborn talent, it's about people just being bad at things.
Let's say I wanted to be a basketball player. I'm tall, have a great build, understand the game and been playing it since I was a kid. But I've got terrible depth perception, my coordination is abysmal, and I've got the aim of a 6 year old. There's nothing physically wrong with me, but my brain just isn't wired to handle those basic things at a level I need to, and I'm not going to be a good basketball player because of it.
And this stuff isn't just a "you're bad or you're good" thing. It's a sliding scale and everyone falls somewhere on it. Some people are going to end up under "there's no hope", and there's not much they can do about it.
Yeah, (IMO) the majority of people can practice until they improve or overcome their shortcomings, but there's a point where it's just not worth it. Ther'es quiting because you don't feel like it, and there's accepting the fact that to get good, you have to sacrifice your lifeto the game. Calling it whining is just being condescending, and a dick move.(for more time on the clock)
A better example than baskteball is art. A lot of people say they just can't draw, something I had the same stance on as you (and a lot of oher posters) do with fighting games. But then I realized that my first "serious" drawing in high school came out better than some kids who'd been at it for years, and that everyone on my mothers side is somehow naturally inclined to art, even though none of them ever try unless they have to.
All you generally need to do to draw or paint is move an object, but I'm not going to show someone a video of a paralysed guy painting an ultra-detailed picture of a city at a birds eye view with a brush in his mouth, and say "why can't you do that, all you have to do is pratice." Regardless of if they can, I'm an asshole for saying that. Even worse if I've been at it for years and even I'm not at that level.
Finally somebody else admits not everybody can get top 8 at evo. Passion and putting in work sometimes will never be enough.Not everyone can place top 8 at EVO. I play with a ton of guys who have passion and put in work and just can't get it done for many reasons. They just don't have it mentally. On the other hand I don't think you need the natural talent some think, like super fast reactions or execution. You can work hard on that and/or mask deficiencies. A competitive drive is more important. I do not excel in those areas but the will to win pushed me to that level. If you have the ability to play well in a competitive environment and you put in the work then you can place top 8 at EVO.
What fighting game is good for beginners of the genre?
To be fair, the original poster described not being good at fighting games as a longstanding bugbear.Why?
I see nothing wrong with not wanting to jump in deeper into the genre when most of the replies in this thread are saying that you have to put in a ton of time to get good at the games. Not everyone is looking to spend a majority of their gaming time on just one genre/game.
Simply put, if anyone is looking to get exceptional at this genre, but are not looking to spend MMO like time in doing so, then either it isn't for them, or they need to readjust their expectations for it.
And I'm bookmarking this thread for future reference for those that swear up and down that elaborate tutorials in FGs will help sell casual minded people on FGs. You've got this guy running for the hills. Grats.
Elaborate tuts only serve the converted, are a waste of resources and intimidate more than they actually help.
All these people saying execution requires some sort of natural talent are you talking about super hard combos with specific timing and hard button presses or "I mess up doing hadoukens"?
To be fair, the original poster described not being good at fighting games as a longstanding bugbear.
Why do you think people are prodigies? They practice when they are very young. Some people considered me a chess prodigy when I was young - it was because I played over 30,000 games of chess on the Internet Chess Club and had a chess coach. I wasn't "gifted".Einstein was a mathematical prodigy. Of course that really separates true genius from everybody else is them beating at their craft having a great vision of themselves but it would be misleading that not having a natural talent did great dividends for their love of their craft.
I don't think you read his post.Finally somebody else admits not everybody can get top 8 at evo. Passion and putting in work sometimes will never be enough.![]()
Nah. If you're not good right away you don't have a God given gift and you should move on to another genre you are God approved to play. Know your limits and be defined by them.All these people saying execution requires some sort of natural talent are you talking about super hard combos with specific timing and hard button presses or "I mess up doing hadoukens"?
By the mental aspect do you mean willing to train for hours? I dont think willingness to train is some sort of natural thing. Or is it understanding of the game?They are not saying that execution, outside of maybe having absurdly fast reflexes, require natural talent. They are saying that the mental aspect requires it, which is what has been up for debate in the past few posts.
Nah. If you're not good right away you don't have a God given gift and you should move pp. to another genre you are God approved to play. Know your limits and be defined by them.
By the mental aspect do you mean willing to train for hours? I dont think willingness to train is some sort of natural thing. Or is it understanding of the game?
I think not wanting to play if you can't reach top 8 at EVO makes sense. I don't play non FG competitive games because I know I won't get to a level I am happy with.
I don't want to speak for other people here, but what I mean is the mental capacity to apply high level mind games, and the ability to clutch through high pressure situations. Of course I also stated that this stuff doesn't really matter unless you are aiming to play at a super high level, so this is a completely pointless discussion in regards to someone just looking to get competent at the genre. For some reason a bunch of people steered the conversation in the direction of being top 8 at EVO and refused to leave it.
People that fall under that have a competitive drive that is far from common. Most people playing these games, even at a competent level, probably aren't there. I'm sure they would be more than happy with reaching that level, but there are lots of people that just get a lot out of simply improving at the game.
EDIT: I especially doubt that someone that's starting from the ground floor in learning the genre is even thinking of going to any tournaments at all, let alone placing high at them.
Yep, been playing fighters since the OG Street Fighter 2 arcade release. Street Fighter is one of my favorite franchises, even to the characters story-lines and what not.
But, 24 years later, when trying to play against other people, especially online, still sucking.