There will probably be a small paragraph in the history books about this being a wasteful smear campaign that helped elect a fraud into the Oval Office.
More like "The case was never solved."
There will probably be a small paragraph in the history books about this being a wasteful smear campaign that helped elect a fraud into the Oval Office.
More like "The case was never solved."
The lesson here is that political parties should not publicly anoint someone their Presidential nominee eight years out as it gives opposition all the time in the world to run a smear campaign.Okay, Democrats. What have we learned here today?
Okay, Democrats. What have we learned here today?
Go after the Trump/Russia ties- Don't stop, even if nothing is there. Hold committee after committee... For 4 years.
Because even if it isn't true, the seed of untrustworthiness has already been planted.
2 wrongs dont make a right....
Kind of amazing a pretty blatant smear campaign worked out
So, could someone explain to me what exactly the whole situation with Benghazi is/was? Either that, or post a link that sufficiently explains it. A couple of conservative friends were trying to tell me that Hillary was a murderer because of it (and hence why they voted Trump), and not knowing really anything about it, I wasn't able to refute them.
So, could someone explain to me what exactly the whole situation with Benghazi is/was? Either that, or post a link that sufficiently explains it. A couple of conservative friends were trying to tell me that Hillary was a murderer because of it (and hence why they voted Trump), and not knowing really anything about it, I wasn't able to refute them.
So, could someone explain to me what exactly the whole situation with Benghazi is/was? Either that, or post a link that sufficiently explains it. A couple of conservative friends were trying to tell me that Hillary was a murderer because of it (and hence why they voted Trump), and not knowing really anything about it, I wasn't able to refute them.
going to be pretty awkward if an embassy gets attacked under Trump
I'll feel bad for them if they actually speak up about this. Otherwise, fuck them too for going along with it knowing it was all complete bullshit.Damage successfully done republicans, congrats on your victory
I just feel bad for the victims families who were played like pawns
Repubs used those dead Americans for a political ploy and nothing more.
Republicans made it sound like she ordered a hit on Chris Stevens.
There's definitely reason for Benghazi to stand out among the rest, though. The problem is both sides were to blame (as well as the risk-averse senior pol-mil leadership) and making changes to our crippling bureaucracy doesn't fit the narrative.Embassies always get attacked. Benghazi was slightly more successful than most, but there's no good reason for it to have received the scrutiny it did.
New York City was attacked under Bush's watch killing 3000 people and the country came together, giving him a second term. Benghazi was attacked under Obama's killing 4 and the right didn't let up on the blame game until Clinton was defeated.
going to be pretty awkward if an embassy gets attacked under Trump
The lesson here is that political parties should not publicly anoint someone their Presidential nominee eight years out as it gives opposition all the time in the world to run a smear campaign.
Your friends are morons that listen to too much conspiracy theorists. Or, they're already Republican leaning, and are looking for rationalizations of why they should vote for a repeat sexual assailant.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Benghazi_attack
Basically the US Embassy to Libya was attacked on the anniversary of 9/11, and there were conflicting reports when it initially happened as to whether it was a coordinated assault or a sad escalation of violence from protesters around the compound.
The situation that grew out of that was questions regarding whether or not Clinton knew that the embassy was a terrorist target and willfully denied the ambassador additional security, which has been disproven over and over again, but because the investigation kept going on for years they were able to keep it in the headlines and forward a narrative that Clinton was complicit in the deaths because *obviously* she had to know something was up.
At least that's my understanding of the subject.
The wikipedia entry I linked above on this is pretty detailed and has a lot of citations you can follow for secondary sources on the subject.
Edit: I believe somewhere along the line in one of these investigations the committee FOIA'd the State Department for Clinton's emails to see what she knew, and that was the first time the general public learned that she had a private email server in the first place.
The smear campaign against Hillary goes way, way beyond 8 years. She's been a GOP boogeyman in one form or another for ages.