• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Bethesda CEO on Starfield an Bugs: " We embrace Chaos"

Flutta

Banned
lol....just now my game froze when I clicked quit game. Embracing chaos....

jennifer lawrence ok GIF
Game is clearly not done, needed more time. But no increasing those GP subs is more important….. 🤦🏻‍♂️
 
What a weird statement.
I can certainly believe that it's true, that freedom invites bugs, and it's fine to laugh about and present bugs in some video in extras or whatever but "embracing" is a stupid attempt on spinning it.

We lost control of the code and game logic! Oh no, shrugs shoulders, grins, patts his own shoulder. What!
 
How about embracing development that gets rid of bugs during the actual dev cycle?
This is simply impossible. Thousands of lines of code made by people. You are bound to get bugs.

People who except bugfree games since the 2000's are simply oblivious to the complexity of coding.

You cant eradicate ALL bugs. It's simply impossible with games of this magnitude...

Yes, games used to have less bugs. But they were also a fraction of the size of modern games coding wise.

More code = More prone to bugs. Its not rocket science.
 
Last edited:

Dr. Wilkinson

Gold Member
How about embracing development that gets rid of bugs during the actual dev cycle?

This entitled & completely unrealistic attitude towards expectations in a game the size & scope of something never done before such as Starfield is why so many developers play it safe and keep making the same thing over again, instead of trying something new.

I’d rather devs keeps pushing the boundaries of what’s possible to new heights. Bugs are part of that, like it or not. Also this game is launching with fewer bugs than any previous BGS title, but I’m assuming that doesn’t matter to you. If you don’t want anything unexpected to happen, maybe stop playing interactive games and go watch a movie or read a book.
 
Last edited:

StereoVsn

Member
This entitled & completely unrealistic attitude towards expectations in a game the size & scope of something never done before such as Starfield is why so many developers play it safe and keep making the same thing over again, instead of trying something new.

I’d rather devs keeps pushing the boundaries of what’s possible to new heights. Bugs are part of that, like it or not. Also this game is launching with fewer bugs than any previous BGS title, but I’m assuming that doesn’t matter to you. If you don’t want anything unexpected to happen, maybe stop playing interactive games and go watch a movie or read a book.
The issue is that Bethesda doesn't bother to fix a lot of known bugs. Latest Skyrim release for the Switch still has same bugs from OG 2011 Skyrim.

That's the issue. If course such a complex title is going to have bugs. Problem is when the developer or publisher don't put in much effort to do anything about them.
 

Hudo

Member
"We embrace chaos. We could make a safer, less buggy, less risky game if we wanted to. But what we try to lean into is player freedom. Yes, there's going to be some little things here and there where your companion might stand a little too close to you sometimes, yet the freedom you get, and the things that happen because of that, we absolutely love and embrace.
I feel like this is the worst answer they could've given. "Yeah, we could make a game with less bugs. Easy. But we chose not to because freedom.

How fucked must your system of systems be when for emergent gameplay to happen, you need to allow bugs. Like, what? One doesn't exclude the other unless you have a major problem in your design.
 

Men_in_Boxes

Snake Oil Salesman
It's actually a good philosophy. Most don't want to deal with chaos so it creates an environment with few competitors.

Bethesda is revered for a reason.
 
Not enough in Bethesda's case.

Irrespective of that, his communications could and should be better.
See my post about bugs, read back your own and then comment. Its IMPOSSIBLE to eradicate all bugs in a game thats 120+gb..... It's not possible.
Unless you do a 4 year beta with 100.000+ dedicated testers, even then you won't come near 100% Bug free.
 
The point being made is that it was a stupid fucking thing to say. The amount of actual bugs is irrelevant.
Oh yes, the reasoning is beyond anything acceptable. Fair point.
They need to be honest and say: Yes, you may encounter bugs but rest assured we take this seriously.
 

JayK47

Member
I was told there would be no bugs. Or at least very little compared to previous Bethesda games. I haven't really seen any so far, but I just started.
 

Dr. Wilkinson

Gold Member
Not enough in Bethesda's case.

Irrespective of that, his communications could and should be better.

I have no problem with them at all. Agree to disagree, I guess. This is by all accounts the least buggy of their games and yet still the complaints and armchair quarterbacking. I find it all a bit tiring. 🤷‍♂️
 

Dr. Wilkinson

Gold Member
Hope you are enjoying your cinematic 30FPS coupled with artistic choice of no local Co-op.

Local co-op is far from merely a “artistic choice”. That would be running two instances of the game on one platform, and not something that would be done well unless the entire game was designed around it. You know this already, of course. You’re just being obtuse.
 

Dr. Wilkinson

Gold Member
Correction - by pretty much every account, the least buggy BGS game in like the first 10 to 15 hours. Intentional as many reviewers may not progress any further? Who knows.
Many many outlets have had the game for 2+ weeks and have played over 100 hours, actually. Playing a non-Day One patch build, in fact. Which would be even buggier, no doubt. Show me all the negative reviews about how the game is too buggy and miring the experience.

Early access users who just started playing overnight are in the range you’re talking about. But sure, let’s keep arguing about this.
 
Last edited:

LiquidMetal14

hide your water-based mammals
If you think about the status and money that was put into this game, it's not acceptable to ship it in some of the state its in.

AAA games are held to a higher standard so with some of the issues and lack of polish in certain reguards, it shows that Bethesda isn't some tentpole or in the status they were during their peak years.

They will work on this and fix but it shouldn't take the community to patch it up.

Dark Souls PC comes to mind when Durante fixed that. Not excusable then even if a "smaller" Japanese studio and less now.
 
Last edited:

LordCBH

Member
As long as it's not game breaking, save corrupting ,freezing or crashing, I'm okay with the occasional bugs. Can even be funny sometimes when a character loses its head, or a creature launching into the air like a rocket when you kill it.

Agreed. The dragons randomly flying backwards in the PS3 version of skyrim was hilarious.
 

skit_data

Member
I felt like embracing chaos when one of the civil war questlines broke on my playthrough of Skyrim when I was trying to platinum the game.
It's like the 5th special anniversary definitive directors cut remastered edition of the game so one would think stuff like that would've been sorted.
 
Top Bottom