I never connected that both of them played lawyers on that show. Haha, awesome.
So I just realised Michael McKean is that same dude in Spinal Tap. Holy fuck!
Chuck is going to die in a fire because of the lanterns he keeps around newspapers...
Whats fucked is that Chuck knows that there's a real chance that Jimmy could succeed if he let him. He doesn't want him to succeed at this. I believe that's why Chuck didn't let Jimmy get hired on HHM. He couldn't even abide the slimmest chance of Jimmy actually succeeding. He hates Jimmy for things he's done in his past. Jimmy took care of Chuck for how many years? Not once did he ask for anything in return. He bootstraped through a law degree, he bootstaped his own firm, and when a time came to help Jimmy, not because he needed it or to bail him out, but on an extension of his own merits, he cast him down.
I think I'd be more sympathetic to Chuck if Jimmy was a parasitic person, but he's not. Chuck, undoubtedly, bailed Jimmy out of something huge, something that would have ruined his life, but it's not shown that this was a common thing. To the contrary, besides the titular bank forgery, Jimmy has done nothing but help Chuck for years now. Not to gain anything, but because he clearly loves his brother. Chuck embodies Americas passion for seeing criminals as criminals no matter how much effort they take to change. It's a self fulling prophecy.
I'm with those who think something bad is going to happen to Kim. I just can't see her breaking up with Jimmy and/or leaving their firm, and that's it. That's too simple.
I'm still not yet thinking Kim dies or suffers some horrible fate due to Jimmy's actions. Francesca who serves as a receptionist for both Kim and Jimmy, and sticks with Jimmy throughout his Saul Goodman practice.
If one of her two bosses wound up getting killed, due in part to the actions of the other, it seems unlikely Francesca would stay.
My guess is that Kim's law career gets tainted or ruined in some way, and she leaves Jimmy as a relationship, an office partner, and a moral compass. Sometimes things are that simple.
If anyone has a darker fate in store for them, my prediction would be Chuck. But having both Kim and Chuck die seems a little heavy handed.
Maybe Kim gets rich and goes spend her days in some tropical paradise.
Y'all are obsessed with the pessimistic angle!
Damn, that would make the Exit sign closing shot hit even more. At this point I could see Chuck and Jimmy just becoming estranged. There's more than enough bad blood now.
What I want to know is what happens to the sweet baby angel that is Kim Wexler?
Can we notmy waifu
Something I may have missed...did Chuck not wonder how Jimmy got those pics of his house that he showed in court?
So I just realised Michael McKean is that same dude in Spinal Tap. Holy fuck!
He was also on snl at the time bob odinkurk was writing for them. Probably old friends
Jimmy had been there a lot, he probably assumed Jimmy took them a while back.
Killing Kim doesn't seem at all like anything these writers would do. I don't even see how they would get to that point. It's too blunt, forward, and downright lazy of a motivation to turn Jimmy into Saul. Like people saying they were gonna destroy or alter the tape when the actual solution to that was more natural and smartly written.
This is a good catch. Every time I see them, them, it freaks me out. Definitely feels like a setup. I also think Jimmy's little speech about how Chuck is going to die alone and unloved is going to be prophetic about both of those brothers.Chuck is going to die in a fire because of the lanterns he keeps around newspapers...
Kim isn't going to die to push Jimmy into becoming even more of a tragic figure. This isn't a cheaply written superhero comic.
Season 3 finale is Chuck killing Kim out of revenge, and she bleeds out in Jimmys arms, saying she loves him just as she gives out. Jimmy gives out a great roar in the pouring rain and then proceeds to look into the camera, saying "Who am I? I'm Saul Goodman...".
EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS
VINCE GILLIGAN
PETER GOULD
I guess, but why (in Chuck's mind) would he take the pics before all this went down?
One thing that kinda bugs me about Jimmy and Chuck. Chuck blames Jimmy for their father's business going under because Chuck believes Jimmy was stealing from the cash register. My memory is a little fuzzy, Jimmy did steal from the cash register, but it was just one time, the real reason their dad's store went under was because their dad was too nice and gave stuff away all the time.
Why hasn't Jimmy tried to explain this to Chuck? That is pretty much the root cause of the way Chuck feels about Jimmy, and it doesn't seem like Jimmy has ever tried to set Chuck straight on the misconception. Just be like, "Chuck, bro, I watched dad give free stuff to people all the time. He wouldn't stop. I got tired of seeing strangers work him over. I took money one time, but dad was an easy mark and bad businessman, stop blaming me for shit I didn't do."
I want a one-off of this.Season 3 finale is Chuck killing Kim out of revenge, and she bleeds out in Jimmys arms, saying she loves him just as she gives out. Jimmy gives out a great roar in the pouring rain and then proceeds to look into the camera, saying "Who am I? I'm Saul Goodman...".
EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS
VINCE GILLIGAN
PETER GOULD
I also wondered about the photographs and Chuck's non reaction; perhaps he was just so up his own ass he didn't think much of it. I wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't come up again though; Chuck is going to go nuts trying to get back at Jimmy now..
You mean the photos that Jimmy got Mike to take?
It's weird, but since those photos were submitted as evidence, it implies that Jimmy and Kim needed to introduce them during discovery before that hearing started. So whatever they did must have been legal (since Chuck allowed Mike into his house), and by the time the hearing started, it wouldn't have been a surprise to Chuck or Howard, even if it did originally surprise them during discovery.
Season 3 finale is Chuck killing Kim out of revenge, and she bleeds out in Jimmys arms, saying she loves him just as she gives out. Jimmy gives out a great roar in the pouring rain and then proceeds to look into the camera, saying "Who am I? I'm Saul Goodman...".
EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS
VINCE GILLIGAN
PETER GOULD
It's kind of funny how Chuck's bullshit detector is on point to almost being psychic when it comes to Jimmy, but he's pretty blind to everyone else. Mike comes in saying he's with Martins repair with no identification or even a uniform logo on him, carrying power tools even though he had specified he not to bring them, and this doesn't set off any alarm bells for him?
Season 3 finale is Chuck killing Kim out of revenge, and she bleeds out in Jimmys arms, saying she loves him just as she gives out. Jimmy gives out a great roar in the pouring rain and then proceeds to look into the camera, saying "Who am I? I'm Saul Goodman...".
EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS
VINCE GILLIGAN
PETER GOULD
No one is saying that killing someone for character growth is bad writing. But in Jimmy's case it is. It doesn't feel like a natural step based on where the story is going and the world the Jimmy and Kim are in. People are just saying that to throw shocking theories at the wall. A more believable and natural step would be Kim leaving Jimmy, or vice versa,of her own accord either because of ethical differences or to protect one another.What about Mike's son?
I agree, Kim isn't dying.
Kim doesn't die. I'm guessing Post-BB Better Call Saul will be Saul trying to reconnect with Kim.
But she doesn't even get mentioned in BB and Saul doesn't try to reconnect with her. Not even a phone call. Seems pretty unrealistic imo.
But she doesn't even get mentioned in BB and Saul doesn't try to reconnect with her. Not even a phone call. Seems pretty unrealistic imo.
But she doesn't even get mentioned in BB and Saul doesn't try to reconnect with her. Not even a phone call. Seems pretty unrealistic imo.
But she doesn't even get mentioned in BB and Saul doesn't try to reconnect with her. Not even a phone call. Seems pretty unrealistic imo.