You guys don't need to stay up. I can spoil the review for you right now.
Waking up in Columbia video from IGN. Features footage and commentary from Ken. Did not see it posted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v09tGcW51sU
You guys don't need to stay up to see IGN's take on BioShock Infinite. I can spoil the review for you right now.
lol.
Wasn't one of the GTA games declared as having an "Oscar-worthy" script and given countless 10/10's?
Oh sure, you'll still blow up cop cars, run down innocent civilians, bang hookers, assist drug dealers and lowlifes and do many, many other bad deeds, but at a cost to main character Niko Bellic's very soul. GTA IV gives us characters and a world with a level of depth previously unseen in gaming and elevates its story from a mere shoot-em-up to an Oscar-caliber drama. Every facet of Rockstar's new masterpiece is worthy of applause. Without question, Grand Theft Auto IV is the best game since Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time.
Ancillary doesn't mean what you think it means. Perhaps noncompulsory?
Do people actually care about review scores for games like these? I am struggling to remember a super hyped up game that got anything less than a 9.
When he opens that door and you see the main city is just amazing and beautiful.
Tuesday, get here please.
Check your steam inventory.
The Halo 4 review thread became genuinely entertaining when GB gave it 4 stars.
Yep. You know how some people will accuse the reviewer for being moneyhatted if they feel the score is too high? Well they can also be accused of purposefully giving a game a low score to get more site hits.Out of 5 I assume. Was 4/5 seen as too low?
new 3-page article, i haven't read it so be warned could be spoilers in it.
New York Times - The Nerd as Auteur in BioShock Infinite
Nice!!
well that "waking up in Columbia" video has pushed me over the edge.
the boiler is at full capacity and the hype train is unstoppable.
By Hilary Goldstein:
10/10
http://www.ign.com/articles/2008/04/29/grand-theft-auto-iv-special-edition-review
Out of 5 I assume. Was 4/5 seen as too low?
Yep. You know how some people will accuse the reviewer for being moneyhatted if they feel the score is too high? Well they can also be accused of purposefully giving a game a low score to get more site hits.
Ah ok,it's still not there yet though,I have nothing in there...
God I hope IGN gives it a 9.9 like GTA: SA and Jade Empire.
I think IGN's review of Jade Empire significantly impacted my perception of playing that game to the extreme negative.
I was filled with almost nothing but pure disdain as I played through it, even though it was a very good game. I just had contempt that IGN could even consider giving out such a ridiculous score to that game.
I felt like they were trying to prove that BioWare could top KOTOR, even though they never have.
For console versions, does the game run at a solid 30fps? Or do we not know yet?
lol. And here I thought that 4/5 meant really really good.
I'll be picking it up Wednesday afternoon from my girlfriend's place, so hopefully by then there will be a consensus.IGN said there were regular, but slight hits on 360. People playing the PS3 version seem to be pretty happy with it, from what I gather.
Is the PC version GFWLive?
Nope, Steam.
GFWL is dead.
I don't think hubris is the right word for what IGN does...
I don't think hubris is the right word for what IGN does...
Assigning a quantitative value (the review score) to qualitative things (parts of the game) seems arbitrary.
Also, how can you delineate a 8.2 from an 8.0 game? Isn't the difference nominal? Why not just round it to the closest whole number?
And don't say, "Because it's IGN."
All this hubris talk is purely ancillary.
For console versions, does the game run at a solid 30fps? Or do we not know yet?
The PS3 version gives players the option of toggling vsync.
valentine71 stated that the framerate dipped a bit on the PS3 when he encountered "many" enemies on screen. He seemed fairly happy with its performance and said it was better than the first BioShock on the same platform in terms of performance.
All this hubris talk is purely ancillary.
BioShock Infinite |OT| No Gods, or Kings, Only Ancillary.
Do we know that he didn't prove it? Or was he banned for apparently being belligerent toward the moderators and FartofWar (Elliot)?But he also didnt prove he had it, in which I take everything he said as possible bullshit.
But he also didnt prove he had it, in which I take everything he said as possible bullshit.
new 3-page article, i haven't read it so be warned could be spoilers in it.
New York Times - The Nerd as Auteur in BioShock Infinite
All this hubris talk is purely ancillary.
He's embiggened this thread with such cromulent usage.
I don't know why someone would lie about having a game and then describe specific elements of it for attention.
I do know why someone would lie about how they got said game. His lack of proof only makes me think he pirated it, not that he never played it to begin with.
I don't know why someone would lie about having a game and then describe specific elements of it for attention..
I don't know why someone would lie about having a game and then describe specific elements of it for attention.
I do know why someone would lie about how they got said game. His lack of proof only makes me think he pirated it, not that he never played it to begin with.
The PS3 version gives players the option of toggling vsync.
valentine71 stated that the framerate dipped a bit on the PS3 when he encountered "many" enemies on screen. He seemed fairly happy with its performance and said it was better than the first BioShock on the same platform in terms of performance.
This took me longer than it should have to get.He's embiggened this thread with such cromulent usage.
Got it.He didn't prove it. He's got a limited time window in which to email us proof if he wants to be unbanned. Otherwise he'll be out for a while.