ryutaro's mama
Member
Measley said:LoL! I am well aware of the effects of Jim Crow and Slavery.
Could've fooled me.
Measley said:LoL! I am well aware of the effects of Jim Crow and Slavery.
Measley said:The black illegitimacy rate is one example of a statistic that has gotten worse since the 1960s (and was one of the original pillars of this thread).
Mammoth Jones said:What are you talking about? Jim Crow lead to the systematic deconstruction of the black family unit. How is momma gonna send her kids to college when the college won't accept "colored" people? How is dad suppose to make wealth that can be passed down to his children when all he is allowed to do is manual labor for less pay than a white man doing the same exact job would get.
Definitely. Just thinking out loud on that one. I make the following assumptions:Blackace said:That is a complete reach right there..
also
Not being married is not equal to not having two parents raising a child..
Blackace said:Which again is a misleading stat.. not being married isn't proof of a single parent household..
72 Percent Of Black Kids Raised By Single Parent
theignoramus said:so why was the OP banned?
Measley said:Again if that's the case, then why was 80% of black children born to married parents DURING Jim Crow, and why are 72% of black children born to unwed mothers TODAY?
Mammoth Jones said:Why is there this disproportionate focus on being wed for black people? Do you believe all people that have children should be married? Because as we've entered the 21st century, there are plenty of people having kids yet don't care to get married. Out of wedlock births are up across the board.
Dare I say: Wedlock is irrelevant. Having two active parents in their child's life with the financial means to support said child is what counts.
If you're going to throw stats around....get the whole picture.
"In 1970 the rate for unmarried black women, 96 per 1,000, was nearly 7 times the rate for unmarried white women, 14. By 1998 this differential was just under 2; the rate for black women fell to 73 whereas the rate for white women rose to 38 per l,000."
Opiate said:Goya, most of that research is very interesting. Despite the obviously decreased position of the Chicago school in economics after the recession, Heckman still remains very respectable and compelling (Lucas lost significantly more credibility than Heckman did, for example).
However, I see no rational explanation given by Heckman for the fact that Black females overperform. Presumably, black female children are given roughly equivalent upbringings to Black male children -- unless we can come up for a plausible explantion for why parents of black girls are consistently better / less likely to separate than parents of black boys.
That there is a gender disparity as well as a racial disparity suggests that there is more at work here than simply upbringing. I do not at all deny that upbrining plays an important role, and Heckman's analysis is strong evidence of that, but it is simultaneously evidence that many other important factors exist beyond "do you have two parents?"
Wedlock is relevant for a bunch of legal reasons alone. It's true that one can be a successful parent without marriage though.Mammoth Jones said:Why is there this disproportionate focus on being wed for black people? Do you believe all people that have children should be married? Because as we've entered the 21st century, there are plenty of people having kids yet don't care to get married. Out of wedlock births are up across the board.
Dare I say: Wedlock is irrelevant. Having two active parents in their child's life with the financial means to support said child is what counts.
If you're going to throw stats around....get the whole picture.
"In 1970 the rate for unmarried black women, 96 per 1,000, was nearly 7 times the rate for unmarried white women, 14. By 1998 this differential was just under 2; the rate for black women fell to 73 whereas the rate for white women rose to 38 per l,000."
Mammoth Jones said:Why is there this disproportionate focus on being wed for black people? Do you believe all people that have children should be married? Because as we've entered the 21st century, there are plenty of people having kids yet don't care to get married. Out of wedlock births are up across the board.
Dare I say: Wedlock is irrelevant. Having two active parents in their child's life with the financial means to support said child is what counts.
Measley said:No, I'm saying that the high rate of black children being born to single parent households has caused the general breakdown of the black community. I also believe that this leads to other issues like crime, academic problems, employment, and the inability to establish healthy relationships.
BTW, we are only focusing on black people because their rate is far higher than any other group in the country.
Londa said:I disagree that being raised by a single parent would lead to issues of crime, academic problems, employment, and the inability to establish healthy relationships.
Measley said:I apologize for the wording. I should have said it increases your chances, which it does.
Measley said:BTW, we are only focusing on black people because their rate is far higher than any other group in the country.
Londa said:And you have hard scientific evidence of this how?
reframe from assuming
Research shows that children of unmarried parents are much more likely to live in poverty, have low academic achievement, and have higher high school dropout rates than those born to married parents. Run-ins with the law, drug use, and incarceration are all more common among children born to unmarried parents. Welfare use is also significantly higher for families with illegitimate children. Infants born out of wedlock suffer higher mortaly rates. Illegitimate children have been found to suffer from more-difficult-to-measure
problems such as low levels of self esteem and self worth. Finally, children of unmarried parents are themselves at higher risk for being unmarried parents when they reach adulthood. One of the most important and troubling findings by researchers is that being born out of wedlock increases the chances of negative social outcomes for children even after controlling for income, race, and other social factors. Illegitimacy is clearly a problem for both those born to unmarried parents and for the larger society.7
Blackace said:But you can't ignore that numbers for all respected races have nearly doubled since the 60s or can you?
Measley said:
Londa said:There are no more places like in Harlem where it encouraged positive growth in the black community (harlem renaissance).
Londa said:I disagree that being raised by a single parent would lead to issues of crime, academic problems, employment, and the inability to establish healthy relationships.
Londa said:I disagree that being raised by a single parent would lead to issues of crime, academic problems, employment, and the inability to establish healthy relationships.
Opiate said:That there is a gender disparity as well as a racial disparity suggests that there is more at work here than simply upbringing. I do not at all deny that upbrining plays an important role, and Heckman's analysis is strong evidence of that, but it is simultaneously evidence that many other important factors exist beyond "do you have two parents?"
marathonfool said:Measley is arguing against the legacy of racism/slavery in America? You really have to start from a willfully ignorant position to continue to insist on a untenable perspective.
Heck it's harder to even be around the kid especially if the single parent is working. A single mom who is working is forced to be more trusting of their child. If there's no time to even be with the kid, how much time could possibly be spent training the kid how to be a man?GamerSoul said:True, but it depends on the environment. If that kid is surrounded by those who are involved in the wrong thing, it's more difficult to keep that kid on a good path.
That word is so depressing for some reason. I can't imagine how self-esteem could be affected if you are always wondering about half of your family tree.Research shows that children of unmarried parents are much more likely to live in poverty, have low academic achievement, and have higher high school dropout rates than those born to married parents. Run-ins with the law, drug use, and incarceration are all more common among children born to unmarried parents. Welfare use is also significantly higher for families with illegitimate children. Infants born out of wedlock suffer higher mortaly rates. Illegitimate children have been found to suffer from more-difficult-to-measure
problems such as low levels of self esteem and self worth. Finally, children of unmarried parents are themselves at higher risk for being unmarried parents when they reach adulthood. One of the most important and troubling findings by researchers is that being born out of wedlock increases the chances of negative social outcomes for children even after controlling for income, race, and other social factors. Illegitimacy is clearly a problem for both those born to unmarried parents and for the larger society.7
Blackace said:More surban kids imititate than inner city kids.. The Icy Hot Stuntas are a good example of that
Inner city kids can relate to it more but I don't believe in my mind they do not imitate rap music..
While it could cause reinforcement that is up for debate...
Londa said:I'm looking for actual test results. I also would like to see if they testing other reasons as to why the child was doing poorly. Like checked to see if they had mental issues, was abused, had a disability, etc.
The Negro Family: The Case for National Action, Office of Policy Planning and Research, United States Department of Labor, March 1965, http://www.dol.gov/oasam/programs/history/webid-meynihan.htm.
Daniel T. Lichter et al.,"Race and the Retreat from Marriage: A Shortage of Marriageable Men?" American Sociological Review, December 1992. David Murray, "Poor Suffering Bastards," Policy Review, Spring 1994,http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_199404/ai_n8716437 . Sara McLanahan and Gary D. Sandefur, Growing up with a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps, Harvard University Press, 1994. Nicholas Eberstadt, The Tyranny of Numbers: Mismeasurement & Misrule, American Enterprise Institute Press, 1995. James Q. Wilson, "Why We Dont Marry," City Journal, Winter 2002, http://www.city-journal.org/html/12_1_why_we.html . Robert E. Rector, et al., "Increasing Marriage Would Dramatically Reduce Child Poverty," Heritage Foundation, May 2003, www.heritage.org/Research/Family/cda0306.cfm. Robert E. Rector, "Marriage: Still the Safest Place For Women and Children," Heritage Foundation, March 2004,
MrPliskin said:I honestly don't think it's up for debate at all. Thinking that celebrated music icons preaching sex, drugs, and money has no impact on a person (especially youth) is just ignorant (and I don't mean this in a disrespectful way).
We're not talking about adults, that is HARDLY where the problem is (well, partly). The problem is with children, rather, what they absorb as they grow older. If their parents show little ambition or value for education, then listening to hip hop (a few artists in particular) really solidifies those values and beliefs.
The best thing I have to go off of is my own "life story". I'm white, but won't deny that urban culture heavily influenced my life until the age of 21(ish). I grew up with a black stepfather (who I love to death) but his values didn't reflect my mothers (or my own at present time). His behavior and the music I was surrounded with greatly influenced what I did, from smoking weed to shop lifting, and almost failing out of high school. Granted I never dealt drugs or stole cars, but I wasn't an angel among the other military families.
I absorbed those same values and thought education wasn't going to be necessary to my success. That all happened over the span of more than a decade and a half.
Denying the impact of a celebrity, especially when it's something as repetitious as a song heard multiple times daily, and the parents that don't correct those values, or make a clear distinction between the two, is a little "forgiving" to say the least. You absolutely HAVE to shoulder the blame on both the parents and the music.
This isn't any different from rock music, etc. It breeds a foundation for kids that absolutely will identify themselves with that life style if they have trouble elsewhere.
...sorry for the rant. I just strongly believe that music is definitely partly to blame. Especially when you've got ignorant kids and adults preaching one thing on a microphone, and then complaining about "the man" or "society" (rap or rock). Best I can say is grow the fuck up to those folks, figure it out.
And no, giving money to a community does not negate your negative influence on your fans, IMO. (Just getting that out of the way before someone talks about a musician donating to charity or some other silly bull).
Blackace said:But you can't ignore that numbers for all respected races have nearly doubled since the 60s or can you?
The Negro Family: The Case for National Action, Office of Policy Planning and Research, United States Department of Labor, March 1965, http://www.dol.gov/oasam/programs/hi...d-meynihan.htm.
Daniel T. Lichter et al.,"Race and the Retreat from Marriage: A Shortage of Marriageable Men?" American Sociological Review, December 1992. David Murray, "Poor Suffering Bastards," Policy Review, Spring 1994,http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...04/ai_n8716437 . Sara McLanahan and Gary D. Sandefur, Growing up with a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps, Harvard University Press, 1994. Nicholas Eberstadt, The Tyranny of Numbers: Mismeasurement & Misrule, American Enterprise Institute Press, 1995. James Q. Wilson, "Why We Dont Marry," City Journal, Winter 2002, http://www.city-journal.org/html/12_1_why_we.html . Robert E. Rector, et al., "Increasing Marriage Would Dramatically Reduce Child Poverty," Heritage Foundation, May 2003, www.heritage.org/Research/Family/cda0306.cfm. Robert E. Rector, "Marriage: Still the Safest Place For Women and Children," Heritage Foundation, March 2004,
Measley said:Enjoy.
Londa said:not going to check out stealth racist material. Point to the ones that aren't bias.
Goya said:I really don't think the influence of popular music explains much. Kids with a good upbringing listen to gangsta rap but never end up looking up to gangsta rappers as role models.
JGS said:That word is so depressing for some reason.
Nope. I can't think of a good word.Measley said:Would you prefer "bastard"?
Blackace said:Actually it is up for debate. If a parent allows HBO or Showtimes dramas to raise their kids then maybe we get a Dexter on our hands... But if parents are raising their kids most kids should know that music is just music..
Goya said:Sure, there are other social forces at work here. The point of Heckman's research is not to suggest otherwise. However, his point is -- and he emphasizes this in the article -- that the skill gap caused by bad parenting is the most important factor behind the racial disparities we observe today, more important than whatever is causing black males to underperform relative to black females, which is probably labor market discrimination specifically against black males (black males are "intimidating," while females aren't, or black males just have a worse reputation than black females).
And by the way, black females still earn, on average, 17% less than white females, so there is still a white-black skill gap among females.
A small aside: There are no "Chicago" or "freshwater" schools of economics. These are meaningless constructs created by ideologues like Krugman who want to pigeon-hole people as bad guys. Lucas is a great economist whose credibility has diminished only in the eyes of the ideological or ignorant. At any rate, Heckman's research interests are not similar to Lucas's.
Shiggie said:Tim Wise speech on The Pathology of White Privilege and institutionalized racism.
one hour but a good listen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Y2mjvFNOwmc#t=438s
It is at this point where the resistance from black women comes into play. Black women know that if they go back too far the blame will fall squarely on them. They made a poor choice in getting with a guy. That guy gets killed or locked because of the sub culture that he subscribes to. That boy now has no father in his life. Another issue is even if the Ray Ray and Pookie were present what would he have to offer his child? Ray Ray and Pookie grew up in a home with no male leadership. Ray Rays and Pookies begat more Ray Rays and Pookies.
The next problem is that the underclass in the black community is out producing the on-point people. This has been going on generationally. What we have now is an imbalance to where the fucked up part of our community poses a serious threat to the very foundation of the community. Ray Rays and Pookies are not the miniority in the community, they have now become the norm. When this happened it changed the core values of the community. Things like standards were lower across the board and shame dissipated. I believe Henry Louis Gates said it best, in order to fix the black community there would first have to be a behavioral revolution. If a black person lives in a community where everyone subscribes to the sub culture then it is easy to understand where they are getting all the positive re-enforcement of their negative behavior. Someone like myself can NOT bring in an outside standard to a community that thinks it is right simply because they are the majority. I would need a critical mass of like minded people to create a cultural shift of that size in order to make any kind of change. Because of this mentorship is NOT the answer. It will not work.
This is the main reason why I place so much blame on the black women. Black people do not control the media, so the promotion and glorification of bullshit is not going to change. Black people do not control businesses or have the networks to help get the majority of the community back on its feet. And even if we did we do not have the educated numbers who would be able to land those jobs. The ONLY thing that can stop or at the very least slow the destruction of the black community is black women picking better men and closing their legs or atleast using condums. The one thing in this world that black people own is their bodies. There is no point in bringing children into this world with no foundation whatsoever. Black women bringing more kids into this world is doing nothing more than keeping the commnity prepetually on the bottom.
And lastly, black women need to accept that bad black males exist. They need to stop trying to hold these guys to the same standard that on-point black men hold themselves to. Ray Rays and Pookies are irresponsible and unaccountable, they create havoc in the community, that is what they do. I will never understand this assumption that these guys are supposed to be good men; THEY ARE NOT THAT! Having a penis does not make a male worthy of leading, being a husband, having children, and being a proper father. The sooner black women realize this the better off they will be. If you got with deviant he is not coming back and chances are you would not even want that type of guy around your children. Being a single mom in the black commuity more times than not is PROOF that the black women made a poor choice in a partner. Simple as that.
EDIT: Let me add this. There is NO solution to the majority of the problems in the black community once it involves having a felony, having a child, or making a number of mistakes. Black people do not have the luxury of any type of cushions like those found in the white community. The ONLY solutions the black community can afford have to be preventative.
Shiggie said:Tim Wise speech on The Pathology of White Privilege and institutionalized racism.
one hour but a good listen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Y2mjvFNOwmc#t=438s
Blackace said:The one thing it could lead to is poverty and those could lead to some of those issues... But again being raised by a single parent isn't some black only issue and if you want to link crime to single parenting then how come the number of blacks in jail vs whites is sooo disproportioned?
The link between fatherlessness and crime is so strong "that controlling for family configuration erases the relationship between race and crime and between low income and crime"
You want to name off all the exceptions in the black commuity? Go right ahead. The exceptions are not going to fix the black community. This is the second time you have tried to make the exceptions swallow the rule.royalan said:Your opinion also doesn't consider what other people in this thread have pointed out: just because the father isn't in the home doesn't mean he isn't a part of his children's lives.
More positive re-enforcement of negative behavior? Yeah that is exactly what the black community needs. Like I said the shame in the black community has dissipated.While I generally agree with you that people in general need to be smarter when it comes to sex and having children, I don't believe the solution is demonizing black women. If anything, single mothers need more support.
SSJ1Goku said:You want to name off all the exceptions in the black commuity? Go right ahead. The exceptions are not going to fix the black community. This is the second time you have tried to make the exceptions swallow the rule.
More positive re-enforcement of negative behavior? Yeah that is exactly what the black community needs. Like I said the shame in the black community has dissipated.
Technically, the context is that black families are still a couple of generation ahead of the trend, so that would have to be factored into it. We have no idea how the overall trend of everyone getting in the single parent mix will do yet, but it's a little unrealistic to suggest that single moms have nothing to do with the black community's plight or that they face the same issues other races face when rearing children.royalan said:1) Wasn't specifically talking about the black community here. As has been mentioned before in this thread, single-parent households are becoming increasingly common across the board. I know that this thread is primarily focused on the factors that contribute to these things being prevalent, but context is important.
Visitation is better than no contact for sure. It's not the same thing as a kid seeing his parents express love and respect for each other. Child rearing is full time, and although being a part time dad is better than nothing, it's still not optimum which is what's needed for your kid to come out OK by long lasting societal norms.royalan said:2) And I don't particularly see you anyone else pulling out stats that demonstrate that the vast amount of kids who are growing up in single-parent households are doing so without any shred of contact or support from their fathers. If I can't use the exceptions to swallow the rule, you can't use the rule to disregard the factors that lead to there even being exceptions.