
Also this soundtrack man..
Blade Runner Blues is to me also one of those tracks that has been stuck to me since forever i saw this movie.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXXo1YDA9tE
Blade Runner's high praise...where does it come from?
PKD was asked to rewrite the book for a "movie version" but he said fuck off. The book has some great stuff the movie left out, like the Mercerite religious cult. There's also a more detailed explanation of the illegal fake animal trade and replicants working in space.
But I wasn't even alive when Blade Runner came outnostalgia
God yes. Blade Runner Blues is one of the best pieces of music I've ever heard in a film.![]()
Also this soundtrack man..
Blade Runner Blues is to me also one of those tracks that has been stuck to me since forever i saw this movie.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXXo1YDA9tE
What stylistic changes have there been to screen acting since the 80's?
Well watching SOME movies back then, they have this very exaggerated emotional acting, like they're acting from some fairy tale moment all the time.
It's a common problem of highly influential stuff. I had a similar reaction to reading The Watchmen. In the time after it was released, comic books learned to be smart, satirical, subversive, self-reflective, etc. so now it doesn't seem like a big deal. But at the time I am assuming it was revolutionary.
It doesn't really matter. Everyone who loves the movie fell in love with it long before the director's/final cut. Not to say those aren't amazing versions of the movie, but honestly, if you didn't like the original cut, you're not going to like the other versions.
I don't mind the voice over and I think that's the best version to watch for your first time to keep up with the story
Subsequent viewings are all about chewing over context, anyway. The content of the dialogue almost doesn't even matter.
Final Cut. Scott had full control over that one, and the time to make it the way he wanted to in the first place.Which cut is the best one?
I see we both enjoy close-ups of sequins, shots of Deckard's meal, and audio of Gaff's cityspeak in the spinner.Workprint.
Is there a definitive list of the differences between the different cuts?
Is there a definitive list of the differences between the different cuts?
What do mean people mean with art direction ?
The costumes ? The world created ? The way scenes were arranged (usage of specific places + layout of objects)
All of these ?
I watched it when It was on TV, but the world created was so immersive. It felt like a video game .
So I've watched bits and pieces of Blade Runner over the last decade, never sitting down to actually watch it in full until last night, finally. And honestly...I thought it was "fine". I don't think I can understand the sentiment I've seen from quite a number of people claiming it as "the best sci-fi film of all time" or something similar.
I really like Harrison Ford as an actor generally but, nothing really stood out to me in the film itself. Props for an incredible setting though. I love cyberpunk and it just oozed of atmosphere. But overall, what exactly are people looking at when they praise it so much?
There weren't really any standout scenes (that I saw anyway), what 'action' there was felt low key and strangely shot, Harrison Ford and Rachel developed a deep relationship seemingly out of nowhere, and just felt like nothing of consequence really happened in the movie. I'm not sure how else to describe it. In the end I just had a "that was it?" feeling. Guide me GAF.
The problem comes when you get trite stuff like "tears in the rain" followed by birds flying away. There's trite, and then there's trite.
Blade Runner's main contribution to cultural importance is in how it defined cyberpunk art direction. The specific look it gave the future to fit the noir tone of the story is extremely iconic. As a film, it's pretty good as far as scifi noir goes, given that there isn't a ton of serious competition in that sub-genre, but it's probably not truly groundbreaking. I think the casting is great, it was well directed, and Rutger Hauer was fantastic in it, even better than Ford. Overall it's not so much a "best movie of all time" thing rather than an enjoyable well made film with art direction which changed how people thought about cyberpunk visually, especially in film.
Don't you goddamn dare!
1. Please consider the fact that it was released in 1982. It was about 30 years ahead of its time.
2. Please consider that it inspired more films then you and I will ever understand, and that its effects are still being felt to this day.
I understand these things just fine, it is basically a "you had to be there" or "for its time" type of thing. When watching the movie today though, it holds up really well in the area that is typically the hardest to do after decades which is the visuals (especially for the environments that it is portraying). But aside from that it just doesn't stand out. The way the movie plays out, the progression etc is just not very interesting. And while there may not have been things similar to it at the time, and lots of things that I've seen over the years may have been influenced by it, that doesn't mean it couldn't be done well enough to hold up today. There are plenty of movies released around that time that still hold up well for me.Jits don't understand context. This is 1982 we're talking about. As other's have posted, you've seen so much shit influenced by Blade Runner.
This is like picking out a classic NES game and wondering where the high praise comes from since there's no regenerating health, save system, or cover.
Well he didn't just happen to catch some random birds flying by right as the scene was ending. The single bird flies away because Roy had been holding it before he died.That line is very cliche. And Scott cuts to birds flying away afterward. Not particularly defensible, I must say.
You're coming into it now after its influenced film for decades. You don't have the context of what is was like when it first premiered-the look of the film was revolutionary.
Well he didn't just happen to catch some random birds flying by right as the scene was ending. The single bird flies away because Roy had been holding it before he died.
It visual design is amazingly influential, no doubt about it, but I don't really see how it was ahead of its time. Late 70s - mid 80s was the golden age of gritty, blue collar sci fi.1. Please consider the fact that it was released in 1982. It was about 30 years ahead of its time.
2. Please consider that it inspired more films then you and I will ever understand, and that its effects are still being felt to this day.
There are great prints circling around, you can still catch it in a cinema from time to time.I really wish i would've had the opportunity to watch this on an actual cinema.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jrg5lG90kzw
Yes. He was shown some test footage but died before the finished product released.I remember reading that PKD saw Blade Runner and liked it. Was surprised it was such a good adaptation. DOnt know if thats true though.