How does everyone here feel about healing in PVP? I've been watching a lot of PVP Youtube clips to get a feel for it and a lot of them with commentary are really aggressive about it and get annoyed when people heal.
I tend to not heal until the other person heals first just out of courtesy if it's a mutual PVP. But in the case of invasions I think they have every right to heal since they're trying to play the game and are being forcibly invaded. I feel like, regardless of how things were done in Souls, this game seems to encourage healing in PVP anyway. The inclusion of a counter against it is pretty telling imo.
Without healing fights go way too quickly 99% of the time anyway. It sucks when you're waiting sometimes upwards of 10 minutes for a match and then it's over within 30 seconds.
What I do:
If I'm invading, and it's 2v1, I probably won't heal unless I feel like I have a good chance to win. 2v1 are really hard to win unless you're OP compared to them, especially if they both heal so I usually just don't bother.
If I'm invading and it's 1v1, I'll bow (unless I see them rushing me). If they bow back I won't heal, unless they do, but sometimes I don't even need to. If they rush me (which is OK too) I might heal but I don't care that much.
If I'm being invaded and I'm in a safe spot (near a lamp, no enemies etc.), I'll bow, and if they bow back, I won't heal unless they do.
If I'm being invaded and I'm far into the level, close to enemies, or in some sort of danger, anything goes, I'll gank them 2v1 if I have a friend, or I'll just rush them (if they bow I won't rush, but I'll still heal to survive).
tl;dr: Basically, if I feel the other player wants to duel (bowing, waiting patiently for me to clear enemies, etc.) I won't heal if they don't, and if it's an "anything goes" invasion, I'll heal if I really care about winning. If that makes sense?