Syphon Filter
Member
Still got canelo/kirkland, khan/algeri, kell brook/gavin. May has been a great month.
Yup, I'll be at the Canelo fight in Houston. Can't wait!Still got canelo/kirkland, khan/algeri, kell brook/gavin. May has been a great month.
Rodriguez is garbage but yes, Lomachenko is a machine, he is already so well developed and still so young. Sky is the limitI just rewatched the Lomachenko fight.
Man, he's unreal. Those combinations, that footwork. He's amazing.
I think the idea that this fight will make people go away from boxing is ridiculous, it will do the opposite. It won't lose those it didn't have, but it will have gained a lot. Watch boxing classes go in crazy demand.
Still thinking about Saturdays fight.
I'm baffled.
Where did Manny's foot work vanish to? I mean, making bee lines for Floyd couldn't possibly be their strategy could it?
the more I think about the fight, the more upset I become at him and his team.
Yes he is. I wish he were a welter, or junior welter.I just rewatched the Lomachenko fight.
Man, he's unreal. Those combinations, that footwork. He's amazing.
just wanted to say, it's nice to see legit discussion about the fight here, as opposed to the general thread/my FB/offline etc where its all NO KO = RIPOFF, what kinda champ runs etc etc ugh
also any idea why illmatic and syphon got clapped up?
Pacquiao is getting surgery on his torn rotator cuff. He won't be fighting again in 2015...or ever again at all.
That would be a horrible way to retire, Saturday nights fight was horrid. He needs to go out with a bang... if he has any of those left in him that is.
he's retiring with a nice paycheck.
If his shoulder was that bad he shouldn't have accepted the fight.
Or he should've postponed it... Mayweather's done it before.
I'm very much looking forward to it, though Kirkland-Canleo is the clear main event of the weekend.Heads up fellas. We have PBC this Saturday.
I'm very much looking forward to it, though Kirkland-Canleo is the clear main event of the weekend.
It's not really a mystery. Ann Wolfe is tough on her fighters. Well, abusive is probably a better word than tough:So any idea what's up with Kirkland and Anne Wolf? Not even HBO could get an answer. My only guess is he doesn't wanna go through her brutal training again. She used to have him on some Rocky IV shit.
It's a shame cuz he's been a machine under her.
It's not really a mystery. Ann Wolfe is tough on her fighters. Well, abusive is probably a better word than tough:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDslGreqL48
She and Krikland make for a good storyline, but there is a reason that she hasn't attract a single other top fighter.
Has Ishida done anything notable since upsetting Kirkland? I think I've seen him fight once afterwards but I really can't recall.
As much as I like Golovkin, he really needs to fight better competition. He's 33 and his best win is Murray.
keep thinking some of ya'll are overhyping GGG but i honestly haven't seen many of his matches - what are his best ones to show his strengths?
Which is not his fault. The dude is crazy active and cops to any terms to get marquee fighters. GGG has long surpassed the point of saying "he needs to fight better competition," and is firmly in "the supposedly better competition needs to fight him" territory.
Murray was robbed against Martinez and likely should have beat Sturm. Macklin was a T10 MW when GGG demolished him with one of the nastiest body shots I have ever seen. Stevens and Rubio aren't great fighters, but they were at least considered durable. GGG hit Stevens with a left so hard it looked like his soul was leaving his body, and damn near took Rubio's head off with another brutal left. There's also Geale, who Golovkin gave "good boy" status to in the span of about 5 minutes.
Now that his name recognition is spreading, we'll hopefully see more marquee opponents being shamed into facing him. There's only so much you can do to get the supposed best to fight you, especially when you're as frightening as he is.
Enjoy.
I also encourage you to watch the matches in their entirety as a better showcase of his skillset, and to provide more context. Most won't take you very long.
If you want specifics, most of the matches mentioned in my above post would be good: Macklin, Murray, Geale, Stevens, Rubio, Rosado. His amateur bouts are also interesting if you can find them (dude was 345-5), but admittedly dated. And there's some great sparring footage (for what it's worth).
That might be true, but it is also a wonderful excuse. I guess he just doesn't bring enough money to the table. Is there no way to force a title shot?
That doesn't change that he hasn't fought impressive opposition.
Murray and Geale looked pretty unimpressive against Sturm, even if both should've won. Those are (by far) his best wins. He demolished those two in wonderful fashion, no doubt. Neither Stevens or Rubio can be considered durable as both got knocked out before, Rubio even in the first round. They're solid opposition though. Here's the thing: Golovkin crushed weaker competition, he buried them. That doesn't necessarily mean he can handle great competition.
If we give Wilder shit for fighting absolutely garbage (who will apparently defend his title against a subpar opponent next), we should complain if GGG fights someone like Willie Monroe, Jr.
That might be true, but it is also a wonderful excuse. I guess he just doesn't bring enough money to the table. Is there no way to force a title shot?
You respond to and quote every word of my post but leave out the one sentence that points out how Cotto, who Golovkin had been relentlessly hounding for a fight, chose instead to fight a guy who GGG reduced to rubble, when Golovkin is his mandatory challenge (post-Geale). The one sentence that prove the points in my post aren't "excuses" for Golovkin, but actually excuses for his opponents.
In your post, reasons are "excuses." The fact is that there are legitimate reasons why someone can look at GGG's record and wonder why he hasn't fought top-tier opponents: everyone is shamelessly ducking him. The real excuses come from the fighters who won't face him, especially when you consider Golovkin's average of four or five fights a year and consistent willingness to give on terms.
He hasn't fought Cotto. There are plenty of other divisions, plenty of other good fighters. What about Super Middleweight or Jr. Middleweight? Cotto dodges him? Okay, then he can go clean better (or in case of super middleweight worse) divisions. Heck, it's not as if Cotto is the only other middleweight titleholder besides Golovkin.
He's fighting What's-his-name next. Come on. I'm not even saying no one is dodging him, I'm sure there's boxers dodging him, I've read e.g. the excuses by Froch. That said, to be considered among the greatest, you have to beat the greatest. Until Golovkin beats those considered great, even if it's just Miguel "I lost to Floyd and Pac" Cotto, he'll have to be filed under "Could be great, but not proven enough".
Edit:
Force them to give up the belt then. Lewis did that to Bowe. There's nothing that ruins a legacy more than a champion vacating a title to dodge opposition.
Still got canelo/kirkland, khan/algeri, kell brook/gavin. May has been a great month.
Can't believe I allowed myself to waste half an hour last night arguing with a friend over clinching in the wake of the Mayweather fight. I thought I was safe from all that post fight nonsense in my personal circle but I guess not. I feel dirty.
The "holding!" thing has been pretty bizarre. How many clinches were there throughout the fight? Not enough to jump out at me, that's for sure. These people just do not watch boxing.