• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Breaking Bad - Season 4 - Sundays on AMC

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nameless

Member
Obviously I still think Breaking Bad is a tremendous show, but if you can watch this scene:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLskwZEbkiE (fucking hate flipped videos but it's all I can find, unflipped version embedded here: http://insidetv.ew.com/2012/06/28/emmy-watch-aaron-paul-breaking-bad/)
and still think Walter is worth rooting for, personally, I think that requires a moral compromise I am not personally willing to make. And that's the nicest way I can put it.

Come on BB. You're essentially implying that people can't compartmentalize their actual moral compass from a television show. You don't really believe that do you?
 
Come on BB. You're essentially implying that people can't compartmentalize their actual moral compass from a television show. You don't really believe that do you?

I personally don't do that. But I don't "roll" bad guys in like WRPGs either.

I'm sure people can, but it's still not something I get down with.
 
The fact that I thought the last shot of S4 made Walt a way more awesome character means that I'm a sociopath with no sense of morality who promotes violence against children in real life. True story!
 

LuchaShaq

Banned
You must really REALLY hate Walter White.

Alot of things swing in his favor despite sharing half of those qualities.

I know people like Skyler but not like Walt so it's easy to lump those bad stories/experiences in with her.

Walt's actor is infinitely better.

Skyler doesn't have chemistry on screen with anyone that even remotely reaches the amazing walt/JEsse chemistry.

Walt is crazy, and I love crazy.


Personally if I had to be in the breaking bad "World" and spend time with someone it would be a non depressed hank.
 

Dany

Banned
Only a week. :D

I don't root for characters. I like some characters and dislike others. They aren't usually the same.
 
Wait, are we supposed to not like walt for what he did to Jane. I had no sympathy for her when she was just going to drag Jesse down into an inescapable abyss of drug addiction and with that much cash they would be dead in weeks. Of course in the end Walt dragged Jesse into an abyss himself.
 

IceCold

Member
I personally don't do that. But I don't "roll" bad guys in like WRPGs either.

I'm sure people can, but it's still not something I get down with.

Do you play violent games? Play GTA? I watch these shows for entertainment, and Walt entertains me so I root for him because I like it when he goes crazy.
 

LuchaShaq

Banned
Wait, are we supposed to not like walt for what he did to Jane. I had no sympathy for her when she was just going to drag Jesse down into an inescapable abyss of drug addiction and with that much cash they would be dead in weeks. Of course in the end Walt dragged Jesse into an abyss himself.

Agree with you here.

Didn't even really care about Brock either. In real life or in a book to me that's horrific. On tv that to me is almost a good act since kids on tv/film are basically my least favorite things ever. Game of thrones kids are basically the one exception to the rule ever for me. Action movies with little kids? (War of the worlds, the first Bale batman movie, etc hell in Mass Effect 3 I wanted to take out a sniper and take that little fucker out before his ship went) I usually root for them to die a horrible death.
 

Nameless

Member
I personally don't do that. But I don't "roll" bad guys in like WRPGs either.

I'm sure people can, but it's still not something I get down with.

Last time I checked, my Skyrim character had killed upwards of 1500 people. Guess that explains it.

What's sorta confusing about Gilligan's comments is a lot of Walt's 'vile' acts tend to be shrouded in gray:

Letting Jane die: She got Jesse using heroin, extorted Walt for Jesse's money(hinting she would extort him in the future) and was clearly leading Jesse down a path where he either OD's or is left with a thumb up his ass after she bails with his money. Look a back at her reaction after Walt drops off the cash. They clearly set her up to be a problem that Walt 'solved'.

Gale's Murder: Fucked up but it was "Gale or them", period. Someone was going to have their life taken and Walt chose self preservation over the life of the guy brought in to phase him out. All parties involved were aware how the game is played in this business.

Poisoning the kid: Again, fucked up, but what's worse, a kid getting sick for a little while OR Walt, Walt's family, and Pinkman all being killed? What of Walt's children? That Brock was ultimately fine, the argument COULD be made that the end justified the means here.
 
Walt is a reprehensible human being and also quite manipulative, even of TV audiences given the amount of people who defend him (especially at the expense of Skylar!) :p

He's a great character but I have a feeling he'll get his eventually. Especially if Jesse finds out about what he did to Jane and Brock
 

Nameless

Member
Walt is a reprehensible human being and also quite manipulative, even of TV audiences given the amount of people who defend him (especially at the expense of Skylar!) :p

He's a great character but I have a feeling he'll get his eventually. Especially if Jesse finds out about what he did to Jane and Brock

Weeds made me dislike Nancy Botwin; she'd fuck someone over every which way for the smallest of reasons..or even no reason. In all the episodes of Breaking Bad I've never seen any true malice in Walt's action. Selfish at times, sure, but you can say the same about the actions of anyone on the show at some point; that's just how people are. But even though he manipulates Jesse when he feels he needs to, Walt constantly goesout of his way to keep him alive throughout.

Were Walt truly a bad guy he would have let Pinkman die seasons ago instead of constantly splitting large quantities of money with him and cleaning up his fuck ups. It goes both ways.
 
Like I said before, it would take something HUGE to make me stop rooting for Walt on his quest to take life by the balls (at the expense of a few innocents :p).

Honestly, what makes it easier is that every season we're introduced to someone(s) worse than Walt who he ends up facing up against. And it's always easier to go with the lesser of 2 evils. Also we can never forget who he used to be, and all that. I could see why some people can't root for him, but I also think it's easy to understand why lots continue.

List of people I root for on this show:

Walt
Hank
Walt Jr.
Jesse
Marie
Badger
Skinny Pete

Everyone but Skyler really, and it's not that I don't root for her, it's that I'm indifferent on whatever her quest is these days, especially after the ted fiasco, not fucking him, the whole other thing :p

And if shit goes down and Walt dies, I won't cry but it would be a sad thing to see how deep down he went. The flashbacks only make it sadder :(
 

CassSept

Member
A new promo pic was posted on BB's Facebook fanpage

376942_10151025111662722_34635987_n.jpg


:lol
 
My first post after getting approved and I'm incredibly glad to see this thread on the front page since there is no thread I'd rather make my first post in. Anyway, with that out of the way I am not replying to anybody in particular (it is much more a general reply, just in case anybody thinks this is aimed at them) but one thing that I've always found with Breaking Bad when compared with other television shows of a similar quality (The Wire, Mad, Men, The Sopranos and Six Feet Under for example) is that I've never felt an actual "connection" to the characters per se. To me at least, as somebody who has followed the series since the beginning, it seems as if the series has always kept me at arm's length from each of the characters so that I don't become emotionally attached to them yet still find them all engaging. I feel that I may have phrased this incorrectly as I still become nervous when the characters end up in danger (such as One Minute) so I guess I do have an emotional attachment to the characters but it is different, in a way I can't quite describe, to one that forms when I watch other shows. Perhaps the best way to describe it is that an emotional attachment forms yet it always feels like I am "detached" from all of the characters and thus not following anybody in specific yet everybody at once (maybe this was phrased poorly and is overly complex or vague to follow, if so I apologise).

The reason I bring this up is because of a comment that somebody made earlier regarding Skyler, that is that (I'm paraphrasing from here) "she is an obstacle for Walter and as such it seems intended that we dislike her as she opposes Walter and we root for him". Perhaps this is just me but as I've mentioned I never felt a specific attachment to Walter like I have with other protagonists and this never really bothered me at all, possibly one of the reasons why I find Skyler such a compelling character (along with pretty much everybody else in the show, including Walter Jr. and his unending desire for pancakes) and don't share in what seems to be a rather significant hatred for her. I'm just curious if anybody who likes Skyler shares a similar sentiment as it may help clarify as to why some like her while others dislike her and while reading the thread (while not a member) I cannot recall seeing something similar mentioned and that is just why I am curious if anybody shares a similar feeling.

And I'm also sorry to bring up the topic of Skyler hatred once more, I know that this is an oft-debated topic in the thread and can become rather heated (which is why I've tried to approach it in a way that doesn't talk about the qualities of the character but instead about the way in which people watch the show to help determine if that has an effect on people's opinion of her).
 

big ander

Member
Didn't you read the interviews where Gilligan told us all how we're SUPPOSED to feel about all the characters and events on Breaking Bad?! If you don't adhere, you're not watching the show correctly!
The fact that I thought the last shot of S4 made Walt a way more awesome character means that I'm a sociopath with no sense of morality who promotes violence against children in real life. True story!
Listen, sarcasm barely works without making you look like an asshole in real life. On the internet your chances of coming out looking saintly and unscathed are even lower. Everyone else here is having a discussion and you're contributing jackshit with your fake wit and stupidity. Either actually talk to people and offer an opinion and people'll respectfully talk to you and we'll have a fun little conversation about a TV show or quit your pathetic and misguided retorts and shut up.
A new promo pic was posted on BB's Facebook fanpage

376942_10151025111662722_34635987_n.jpg


:lol
Rare instance where a social media arm of a show does memes right. nice
Everyone but Skyler really, and it's not that I don't root for her, it's that I'm indifferent on whatever her quest is these days, especially after the ted fiasco, not fucking him, the whole other thing :p

And if shit goes down and Walt dies, I won't cry but it would be a sad thing to see how deep down he went. The flashbacks only make it sadder :(
Fair enough on Sky.
And of course I'd be sad if Walt died. Just because I think the person he is now is despicable doesn't mean I never liked him or don't want to see him redeem himself at all. It's exactly what you said: if he died as a massively wealthy but morally corrupt kingpin, I'll be distraught over how far he fell.
My first post after getting approved and I'm incredibly glad to see this thread on the front page since there is no thread I'd rather make my first post in. Anyway, with that out of the way I am not replying to anybody in particular (it is much more a general reply, just in case anybody thinks this is aimed at them) but one thing that I've always found with Breaking Bad when compared with other television shows of a similar quality (The Wire, Mad, Men, The Sopranos and Six Feet Under for example) is that I've never felt an actual "connection" to the characters per se. To me at least, as somebody who has followed the series since the beginning, it seems as if the series has always kept me at arm's length from each of the characters so that I don't become emotionally attached to them yet still find them all engaging. I feel that I may have phrased this incorrectly as I still become nervous when the characters end up in danger (such as One Minute) so I guess I do have an emotional attachment to the characters but it is different, in a way I can't quite describe, to one that forms when I watch other shows. Perhaps the best way to describe it is that an emotional attachment forms yet it always feels like I am "detached" from all of the characters and thus not following anybody in specific yet everybody at once (maybe this was phrased poorly and is overly complex or vague to follow, if so I apologise).

The reason I bring this up is because of a comment that somebody made earlier regarding Skyler, that is that (I'm paraphrasing from here) "she is an obstacle for Walter and as such it seems intended that we dislike her as she opposes Walter and we root for him". Perhaps this is just me but as I've mentioned I never felt a specific attachment to Walter like I have with other protagonists and this never really bothered me at all, possibly one of the reasons why I find Skyler such a compelling character (along with pretty much everybody else in the show, including Walter Jr. and his unending desire for pancakes) and don't share in what seems to be a rather significant hatred for her. I'm just curious if anybody who likes Skyler shares a similar sentiment as it may help clarify as to why some like her while others dislike her and while reading the thread (while not a member) I cannot recall seeing something similar mentioned and that is just why I am curious if anybody shares a similar feeling.

And I'm also sorry to bring up the topic of Skyler hatred once more, I know that this is an oft-debated topic in the thread and can become rather heated (which is why I've tried to approach it in a way that doesn't talk about the qualities of the character but instead about the way in which people watch the show to help determine if that has an effect on people's opinion of her).
Great post. I don't know that I'd call what you feel "detachment," but I do know what you mean. I myself call it "fascination." Where, due to the quality of the writing, every movement a character makes is compelling and danger and thrills remain intact, but you know you'll appreciate the big picture no matter what pain comes. Just like you I'm having a hard time parsing out exactly what I mean, but I think that makes enough sense for now.
 
Listen, sarcasm barely works without making you look like an asshole in real life.

Sarcasm can be a great tool to prove a point. I was taking the Stephen Colbert route of being purposely absurd to highlight an actual absurdity. And if anything, your bitter, angry reply is evidence that it *did* work.

Everyone else here is having a discussion and you're contributing jackshit with your fake wit and stupidity.

Like I said, I was trying to prove a point that was relevant to the discussion.

You are the one who is sitting here calling me stupid and an asshole. What exactly is that contributing again?

quit your pathetic and misguided retorts and shut up.

Quit telling people how they're "supposed" to feel about the complex characters/events on this show. That shit just rubs me the wrong way. And besides, your opinion is wrong =).
 

big ander

Member
Sarcasm can be a great tool to prove a point. I was taking the Stephen Colbert route of being purposely absurd to highlight an actual absurdity. And if anything, your bitter, angry reply is evidence that it *did* work.
So here you compare yourself to Stephen Colbert and claim that your goal all along was to be so absurd to the point of purposefully derailing the conversation we were having. OK.
Like I said, I was trying to prove a point that was relevant to the discussion.

You are the one who is sitting here calling me stupid and an asshole. What exactly is that contributing again?
I was calling you an asshole because you were sitting on the sideline firing off the same stupid joke over and over without actually talking to anyone or offering a real, constructive opinion. I had been just talking with people until that, which is contributive.
Quit telling people how they're "supposed" to feel about the complex characters/events on this show. That shit just rubs me the wrong way. And besides, your opinion is wrong =).
I never said anyone had to feel one way or another, but art has intent and you can support that intent by providing evidence from the show. And that's the kind of discussion it was.
 
The show started by showing us a high school teacher who gets told he has cancer, who is supposedly a genius and has had his work win others the nobel prize, who tries to do something to help his family out financially before he dies.

How do you not get emotionally attached to Walter at that point?

I can understand if you say you don't feel any attachment to him now, after having some a lot of questionable things.

But to say you were never emotionally connected to Walter is a bit strange to me.
 

big ander

Member
The show started by showing us a high school teacher who gets told he has cancer, who is supposedly a genius and has had his work win others the nobel prize, who tries to do something to help his family out financially before he dies.

How do you not get emotionally attached to Walter at that point?

I can understand if you say you don't feel any attachment to him now, after having some a lot of questionable things.

But to say you were never emotionally connected to Walter is a bit strange to me.

I was definitely connected to his nice, bad luck side. And that's the man I'm still connected to.
 

maharg

idspispopd
I think Walt was always a dick. The 'nice guy' we were shown at the beginning was a myth. He's a distant, emotionally manipulative, petty man and always has been.
 
I think Walt was always a dick. The 'nice guy' we were shown at the beginning was a myth. He's a distant, emotionally manipulative, petty man and always has been.

I think at once in his life he was a genuninely nice person. The ravages of life's circumstances lead him to becoming the somewhat cruel manipulative bastard we see today. I think this is why this show is so fascinating to watch because many of us have experienced the sort of let downs and bad life events that make us miserable inside, but Walt just takes it to the extreme than none of us would.
 

maharg

idspispopd
I think at once in his life he was a genuninely nice person. The ravages of life's circumstances lead him to becoming the somewhat cruel manipulative bastard we see today. I think this is why this show is so fascinating to watch because many of us have experienced the sort of let downs and bad life events that make us miserable inside, but Walt just takes it to the extreme than none of us would.

The 'bad events', aside from getting Cancer, going back even before the show start, appear to be all of his own making.
 

big ander

Member
I think at once in his life he was a genuninely nice person. The ravages of life's circumstances lead him to becoming the somewhat cruel manipulative bastard we see today. I think this is why this show is so fascinating to watch because many of us have experienced the sort of let downs and bad life events that make us miserable inside, but Walt just takes it to the extreme than none of us would.

Pretty much. The nice guy was his outer layer and he never let it take over, unfortunately.
 

kehs

Banned
I think Walt was always a dick. The 'nice guy' we were shown at the beginning was a myth. He's a distant, emotionally manipulative, petty man and always has been.


*Fist bump*

He left Gretchen at a cabin cause he didn't get his way early on.
 

Jimothy

Member
I think Walt was always a dick. The 'nice guy' we were shown at the beginning was a myth. He's a distant, emotionally manipulative, petty man and always has been.

I always took Walt as being sick of people not taking him seriously. Hank emasculates him in front of everyone when he was holding the gun at the party. Then Walt Jr. calls him a pussy for giving into his cancer. Heisenberg is Walt's masculine fantasy. The only time he's intimate with Skylar is when he comes home from cooking or a drug deal. The adrenaline that comes as result of being a fucking badass is intoxicating to him, and now he's completely consumed by it.
 
I always took Walt as just being sick of people not taking him seriously. Hank emasculates him in front of everyone when he was holding Hank's gun as a party. Then Walt Jr. calls him a pussy for giving up. Heisenberg is Walt's masculine fantasy. The only time he's intimate with Skylar is when he comes home from cooking or a drug deal. The adrenaline that comes as result of being a fucking badass is intoxicating to him, and now he's completely consumed by it.

I think it's okay if that inspires you to, say, demolish the bullies picking on your son. Not so much to let a girl choke on her own vomit.
 

Jimothy

Member
I think it's okay if that inspires you to, say, demolish the bullies picking on your son. Not so much to let a girl choke on her own vomit.

Jane dying was good for Jesse in the long run. He even admits they both would have been dead soon if Jane had her way with him. Her death galvanized Jesse to get his shit together and get clean. Of course Walt's reasoning for letting her die were most likely selfish and purely a business decision, but he indirectly helped Jesse by doing so.
 
What details do we know about Gretchen and Walter to say definitely that it was Walter who fucked up their relationship and his research?

As far as Walter always being this way, I dunno about that. He was a good husband, a good father. Look at the tape he makes in the pilot where he is saying goodbye to his family. He sounds like he genuinely tried to do something to help them out since he loved them.

He has since changed a lot though. He isnt the same person now at all.
 

tokkun

Member
I'm sure in Walt's mind he doesn't think the kid was ever in serious danger because he knew the that he would put it in Jesse's mind that it was poison and that if the hospital started the anti-toxin that the kid would recover.
 

Extollere

Sucks at poetry
I always took Walt as being sick of people not taking him seriously. Hank emasculates him in front of everyone when he was holding the gun at the party. Then Walt Jr. calls him a pussy for giving into his cancer. Heisenberg is Walt's masculine fantasy. The only time he's intimate with Skylar is when he comes home from cooking or a drug deal. The adrenaline that comes as result of being a fucking badass is intoxicating to him, and now he's completely consumed by it.

Awesome observations, and spot on. Can't wait for the season to start.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom