moop2000 said:As good as that was that song will always be about Six feet Under and gets me hard every time I hear it thinking about the last scenes of that fucking awesome show. Best TV ending in history, period.
Amir0x said:Gus redirects the danger that Hank was only in because Walt is a horrible meth cooking asshole. The cartel was going after Walt, then because Gus needed him to continue to be the awful human being he is... he found a scape goat to misdirect the violence. It's a direct expansion of the danger his family is always in due to what he does, and that he carelessly discards as if it means nothing.
It's hilarious to me how people are constantly trying to find ways to justify the awful things Walt has done to literally every person he knows. I always love reading these comments, genuinely.
Agreed, it sounds so out of place in other shows.moop2000 said:As good as that was that song will always be about Six feet Under and gets me hard every time I hear it thinking about the last scenes of that fucking awesome show. Best TV ending in history, period.
Yeah, The Shield nailed it.Zeliard said:I think the way The Shield ended with Vic Mackey's character is probably the most interesting and memorable fashion that an immoral protagonist's story has ended (in a TV show).
Foliorum Viridum said:It confuses me that people can't accept Walt's a horrible person.
Puddles said:So blame Gus for Hank getting shot. Walt didn't "directly" cause anything. In fact, there's a perfect word that we can use in this situation: "indirectly".
What's funny is the fact that if a news story in OT was posted about a drug dealer who made millions a year by making pure drugs that ruined lives, murdered several people, laundered money etc etc he'd be called the devil.Copernicus said:He fell into some bad times man. It could happen to anyone. In fact it probably will happen to everyone. Deep down inside everybody there's a little heisenberg just waiting to disassociate the next corporal body that crosses his path.
I felt more sorry for Vic than I do for Walt. I'm not sure what that means because they're both such terrible awful men, but yeah.Foliorum Viridum said:Yeah, The Shield nailed it.
Vic was an utter cunt, whom I somewhat felt sorry for at times, but on the whole he was just a disgusting human being. The end of The Shield is utterly perfect. Anyone who didn't want todidn't understand the show. You can't have a better ending than that.see him suffer his worst nightmare in a desk job
Amir0x said:He has literally destroyed Jesse, taking him from a wannabe gang banger to an actual murderer who is always in threat of losing his life and all the associated anxiety
he took Skyler from a typical middle income suburban lifestyle to someone who inserts herself desperately to try to gain control of an incomprehensible shift in the man she married and loved at one point and has now become hopelessly entangled in illegal and family destroying activities
he forced Walt Jr. to drink alcohol as a sort of alpha male test
he allowed Jane to die
he murdered people to protect his own ass
He is directly responsible for Hank becoming crippled as he is.
And, one day, he will likely be directly responsible for the complete and final destruction of his family... because his ego has so dramatically run away with him. He cooks likely the most chemically pure meth ever conceived on the planet... so pure that god knows how many methheads have OD'd from their inability to properly judge doses because of how powerful it is. I don't think that is necessarily good/bad on a moral scale, because I always believe it's purely an adult's responsibility whether they want to inject shit into their body. But there's no denying the level of corruption he has inserted into society by being the man he has now become.
At least Vic did a lot of good as a police officer. He was genuinely good at his job when he wasn't twisting it for his own fucked up agenda. When he put his mind to it, he brought a lot of (fellow) scumbags to justice.big ander said:I felt more sorry for Vic than I do for Walt. I'm not sure what that means because they're both such terrible awful men, but yeah.
tycoonheart said:No one argued tony was a nice guy. He is a mob boss, doing fucked up shit comes with the territory. But the audience still liked him because he was the protagonist and he was a very interesting character. People didn't want to see him dead.
Same thing with Michael Corleone. Mob boss who did a lot of fucked up things. But the audience still likes him and I don't see people arguing over whether he is detestable or not like some of you guys do over Walter white.
The thing is Walter does indeed do detestable things on the show but that doesn't mean you can't like his character and still root for him. Ya he watched Jane die... so fucking what? I still want to see him come out on top when its all said and done.
Amir0x said:The argument is that some people who follow a show will root for the main character no matter what he does. I find that such a horrible way to watch shows, such an incurious way to approach any medium that it's slightly embarrassing for those individuals.
Foliorum Viridum said:If I was watching it going "Yay, go Walt!" I just can't fathom how it would be enjoyable.
How can you do that, though? How can you want a disgusting human being to succeed? The whole point of the show is to see Walt go deeper and deeper and wanting him to get his comeuppance.Puddles said:I do this, and it's one of the best shows ever, IMO.
tycoonheart said:The thing is Walter does indeed do detestable things on the show but that doesn't mean you can't like his character and still root for him. Ya he watched Jane die... so fucking what? I still want to see him come out on top when its all said and done.
It's a fucking TV show, not a documentary. Get off of your high horse.Amir0x said:.
See? There are people like this in the world. Actual people with minds. They just want to be pacified with their entertainment and, no matter if the main character was killing children for a living, they would find a way to justify liking him and wishing him ultimate success.
big ander said:I felt more sorry for Vic than I do for Walt. I'm not sure what that means because they're both such terrible awful men, but yeah.
A TV show that has depth and characters with more than one dimension. This is hardly over-analysing the show - Walt being a horrible character is the fundamental foundation of the show.tycoonheart said:It's a fucking TV show, not a doxumenrary. Get off of your high horse.
Foliorum Viridum said:A TV show that has depth and characters with more than one dimension. This is hardly over-analysing the show - Walt being a horrible character is the fundamental foundation of the show.
Foliorum Viridum said:How can you do that, though? How can you want a disgusting human being to succeed? The whole point of the show is to see Walt go deeper and deeper and wanting him to get his comeuppance.
Puddles said:This is bullshit. Jesse was the one who went after those two dealers. All Walt did was save his life. At that point it was either Gale or the two of them, and Gale was more than willing to let them die. Killing him was the right decision to make.
Puddles said:He never wanted Skyler to get involved. He didn't force her to play detective, he didn't force her to fuck Ted, and he didn't force her to get involved with the car wash scheme.
Puddles said:What a monster! His son puked in a pool!
Puddles said:This one is a little more questionable. But she was a deranged drug addict who would have gotten him and Jesse killed or imprisoned, and wouldn't have lasted long anyway.
Puddles said:Who?
Gale = justified.
The two dealers = more than justified.
Krazy 8 = self defense.
Puddles said:That shit is on Gus.
Puddles said:If anything, he's probably making it a little safer for the meth-heads. Impurities can cause a lot of problems.
Amir0x said:The argument is that some people who follow a show will root for the main character no matter what he does. I find that such a horrible way to watch shows, such an incurious way to approach any medium that it's slightly embarrassing for those individuals.
tycoonheart said:My apologies, Amir0x. I forgot you have the final say on how a show should be watched and how it should be interpreted. I'll make sure I PM you for your opinion before I make any judgement regarding the characters on the show so I can be as morally sound as you are.
Amir0x said:In Puddles world, killing is justified as long as you're doing it to cover up your illegal drug dealing enterprise and to cover your ass for being involved in said enterprise! Man, the comedy keeps rising in these justifications. I don't mean to be condescending, even though it's hard not to be here, but it really is hilarious. I've lol'd several times irl, which is immensely difficult for things online.
Puddles said:The best thing about this is when you come back here to edit your posts in a few months, you'll get to laugh all over again!
Amir0x said:You can watch it any way you want - and I can watch those who respond with such genuinely unintellectual points of view and direct them with the truth inherent in the show.
Amir0x said:The best thing about this is that in your banal attempt to avoid actually having to defend your illogical positions, you think that this is somehow insulting to me.
I keep up lolin', gets better every second![]()
Puddles said:No, I just decided to burn a post on a quick jab because there wasn't a whole lot to respond to in the last one.
Apparently, according to you, the thing for Walt to do would have been to let Jesse get killed the two dealers. If Jesse had somehow made it out alive, the thing to do would have been to just let Gus kill them both, since killing a man who has made it clear that he doesn't have a problem with indirectly killing you and your partner isn't justifiable in the slightest.
Puddles said:Aside from the idea that killing in self-defense isn't justified (which would have meant the show would have ended in Season 1 with Krazy 8 killing Walt in the basement), your other main argument is that Walt is endangering everyone by remaining in the drug game. Conveniently, you forget that Walt hasn't been able to just quit for quite some time now. He got involved with Gus' operation because he thought it represented safety and stability in contrast to the insane shit he had to deal with under Tuco. Real talk: do you think he knew just how deeply involved Gus was with the cartels and the street-level scum like the guys who killed that little kid?
Puddles said:Walt has entered a series of rapidly escalating situations that never presented a clear way out. If he told Gus he was quitting, do you think he wouldn't be murdered immediately, along with his entire family?
Exactly. And, personally, through all 7 seasons, I still felt that way about Vic. Despite the monstrous places he goes to, I still felt he was doing it for his family in a way. They are much more than an excuse to break bad.maharg said:I'm watching The Shield for the first time right now, and so far (midway through season 2) I find Vic a more sympathetic character than Walt at the same respective points in their series'. Not sure why, they have very similar motivations and flaws. But somehow I just believe that Vic really does care about his family while I think Walt just uses them as an excuse and a weapon.
They're both still scumbags, though.
AlternativeUlster said:What the hell are you guys arguing about? I personally think that most of Walt's actions are justified and to the big decisions, would probably do the same. What would you do in any of these situations Ami?
Amir0x said:No, he only went and involved his family anyway by putting them all in mortal danger by being involved in this horribly dangerous drug dealing underworld - more than once the show has illustrated why his family is in actual danger, even putting aside Hank - and Walt's delusions about them being in no risk is just that. He's risked their livelihood financially, he's risked the dissolution of the family unit if caught, he's risked their actual lives period all for his egotistical grab for power. ANY other reading of the show is not only wrong, it's directly contradicted by what the writers of the show themselves have said.
Skyler did wrong as well, but she would never have been put in that position were Walt not the abominable human being he is. He forced her into a situation where she had to decide what to do to keep her family in tact, and though she ultimately made the wrong choice and she has to live with it now, were it not for Walt none of it would have happened. Again, Walt is directly responsible for the systematic destruction of everyone's moral foundation.
Amir0x said:The thing to do, as any morally sane person would have done, would be to exit stage left, go to the police, enter witness protection and take responsibility for what you've done. For the earlier action, it would have been to not get involved in the first place. But let's say you justify the first two murders he ever committed. The one in the basement? That's "self-defense"? He had him tied up. Just because he took a piece of plate glass? Walt knew before that moment what he had done, which is the moment he chose to kill him. Walt could have, instead, gone to the police and admitted what he had done, and taken responsibility. That is the morally right thing to do.
Justified how? Is it justified to the legal system? Is it justified only to your moral code? Is it justified as a form of survival? Would anyone see it that way? If in real life you involve yourself with a gang and then, in the process, someone ends up dead because you decided it was either him or you, what do you think would happen?
A. You'd get off scott free and everyone would think it was justified.
B. You'd spend life in prison.
C. You'd spend life in prison but the judge and most people would be all "it was wrong but, you know, I understand why you did it! I would have done the same thing too!"
He had many clear ways out many many times.
harSon said:This is just flat out stupid. How does Walt putting her in this predicament matter? It's certainly true that Skyler wouldn't be down this road if it weren't for Walt, but who cares? You're simply playing a game of "What if" at this point. If Walt hadn't gotten Cancer, he wouldn't be a scumbag life-ruining murderous drug dealer. The fact that Cancer was the impetus to all of horiffic decisions does not excuse the fact that he ultimately made immoral life choices. The same is true for Skyler. While it's a difficult thing to do, she could have truly protected her family by turning in Walt upon finding out that he was knee deep in the drug dealing business. But she didn't and she deserves 100% blame and zero sympathy for making that decision. End of story.
AlternativeUlster said:You should remember though that Walt had cancer and needed a quick fix to get his family a net of cash so they could survive. How far would you go to help your family? Would you just allow yourself to die, doing nothing, and making your family struggle? It isn't about morals then but about doing what you can to help your family by any means possible.
AlternativeUlster said:You should remember though that Walt had cancer and needed a quick fix to get his family a net of cash so they could survive. How far would you go to help your family? Would you just allow yourself to die, doing nothing, and making your family struggle? It isn't about morals then but about doing what you can to help your family by any means possible.