Oh noes, they are taking away my rights to sell illegal timber! What on earth will I do now!Believe it or not, this isn't satire:
![]()
You do realise that if any more power was to be transferred from Westminster to Brussels, it'd automatically be put to a referendum? There's absolutely no way we end up in a United States of Europe unless the people vote for it.
How is it too late if you have the option to vote No then? If it comes to that "superstate" it would be countries joining willingly. If they don't join, they'll continue operating like now. You are not getting kicked out then suddenly or something.Yes I do realise that there will be another referendum in 15 - 20 years time on whether we want to be part of some fucked up United Europe. I also realise that in 15 - 20 years time when we are being given the choice it will be TOO LATE. It is already pretty obvious that the UK is immensely entwined in the EU as it is now. It is going to be pretty damn harsh and difficult to break away as it is, It will be even worse in 15 - 20 years time.
We either break away now and use these 15 - 20 years to try and carve out something for us in the world or we accept that we will be joining an EU superstate. For all intents and purpose this is our referendum on whether we want to be part of an EU superstate, this is our only meaningful chance of avoiding the superstate. In another 15 - 20 years it will be too late and we will have no choice.
Oh noes, they are taking away my rights to sell illegal timber! What on earth will I do now!
Are these supposed to be examples from them of over regulation from Brussels?
If they want to pay the same per capita as now for less say in the process and still obligated to use 3/4 of the regulation the EU wants, go right ahead I guess (http://infacts.org/norwegians-pay-same-brits-eu-access/). It will be an idiotic decision for the UK with years of economic impact, but maybe they'll be happy with their "sovereignty".
Believe it or not, this isn't satire:
[IMG ]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bq524p_IgAA06CP.png[/IMG]
How is it too late if you have the option to vote No then? If it comes to that "superstate" it would be countries joining willingly. If they don't join, they'll continue operating like now. You are not getting kicked out then suddenly or something.
I really don't get what you are fearful of with this.
Because them bastards in Brussels are ruling us with an iron fist, damn them and their restrictive and draconian rules.I know never underestimate the ignorance of people but I am really struggling to find anything in that Daily Express list that most "normal" people would be upset over, if anything it may convince some fence sitters that maybe the EU isn't so bad
If the EU becomes a superstate, individual countries will vote to either join or not. If they don't join, they'll continue having relations with that superstate like they do now within the EU. I really really really doubt it will be a "join or get fucked" choice.I explained in my post. But I will make it clearer for you. If we leave now it is going to hurt the UK, I am sure you will accept that. It is going to be painful, damaging and it will be an uphill struggle to separate us from the EU as we are now. At least if we leave now we will have 15 - 20 years to prepare ourselves to deal with the EU superstate.
If we wait till there is an actual referendum on whether we want to be a part of the superstate the choice will be meaningless. We will be too ensnared in the EU to leave. If we wait for another 15 - 20 years the next referendum will be "join the EU superstate or face complete and utter destitution by leaving the EU". That is why I say this is our one and only chance to get out of an EU superstate and prepare the UK to compete with it.
As far as I know: None. It is impossible to join all those countries in such a short time. In 50-100 years, maybe. But even that has low chances.Is this EU superstate idea the result of some doom and gloom fantasy or is there any solid grounding for this 15-20 year timescale for when it happens?
If the EU becomes a superstate, individual countries will vote to either join or not. If they don't join, they'll continue having relations with that superstate like they do now within the EU. I really really really doubt it will be a "join or get fucked" choice.
If some countries in the EU become a superstate and major player in the world, wouldn't you want close relations, open trade and free movement to make use of that?
We here as a tiny country (Netherlands) have major benefits from being close to a comparative larger state next door by keeping good relations.
Is this EU superstate idea the result of some doom and gloom fantasy or is there any solid grounding for this 15-20 year timescale for when it happens?
Ah if Juncker and co had their way we would have a United States of Europe in 15 - 20 months. I think he wants a fancy Airforce One plane like Obama's. There is a major push for a United States of Europe that at the moment is on hold due to the referendum. If the UK votes to remain by a sizeable result this will encourage and probably speed up this integration. As for time scale that is a guesstimate, could be a bit longer could be a bit sooner.
I work in Central London, and live out in Zone 6 - and I don't know a single person supporting Leave. My family up in Yorkshire know tonnes of people supporting Leave though.
From my very limited evidence - this demographics breakdown seems to be accurate:
![]()
We either break away now and use these 15 - 20 years to try and carve out something for us in the world .
It won't be binary. It will be a slow process to integrate certain countries that want to on a government level. The ones that don't want to will not be forced to either join that or leave everything. They will continue operating with open borders, free movement, etc. Of course for things that concern the countries within the EU but not joining that superstate, their influence will go down a bit, because they are smaller, just like right now the UK has more power then let's say a Slovakia or Estonia.You are living in fantasy land if you think the EU as it is today will continue once the push for an EU superstate happens. The next referendum after this on whether to join the superstate will be just as binary as this one. It will be "join the EU superstate or leave the EU" that will be it. There will be no "oh we like how shit is now so we will stay as we are" option. Any country that votes to not join the EU superstate will be destroyed economically unless that nation has had time to prepare for it (you know just like how the EU is threatening to destroy the UK right now if we leave).
Do you have anything to back this up?Ah if Juncker and co had their way we would have a United States of Europe in 15 - 20 months. I think he wants a fancy Airforce One plane like Obama's. There is a major push for a United States of Europe that at the moment is on hold due to the referendum. If the UK votes to remain by a sizeable result this will encourage and probably speed up this integration. As for time scale that is a guesstimate, could be a bit longer could be a bit sooner.
If we Brexit can l claim asylum in Belgium from a sub-human quasi-politcal Blo-Jo-Gove-IDS junta?
I think l have grounds for doing so.
You are living in fantasy land if you think the EU as it is today will continue once the push for an EU superstate happens. The next referendum after this on whether to join the superstate will be just as binary as this one. It will be "join the EU superstate or leave the EU" that will be it. There will be no "oh we like how shit is now so we will stay as we are" option. Any country that votes to not join the EU superstate will be destroyed economically unless that nation has had time to prepare for it (you know just like how the EU is threatening to destroy the UK right now if we leave).
No, and I don't gamble with the future of the country I live in based on 'weird feelings'
"Highest qualification GCSE or lower" vs "Highest qualification A Level or equivalent" vs "Graduates" ... lol
Believe it or not, this isn't satire:
![]()
The implication there being that you think that if we do stay part of the EU, that we won't be able to make something of ourselves in the wider world.
That's pretty foolish, really.
It won't be binary. It will be a slow process to integrate certain countries that want to on a government level. The ones that don't want to will not be forced to either join that or leave everything. They will continue operating with open borders, free movement, etc. Of course for things that concern the countries within the EU but not joining that superstate, their influence will go down a bit, because they are smaller, just like right now the UK has more power then let's say a Slovakia or Estonia.
Not sure if you're joking or just fucking insane...
Just like the Euro or Schengen were a "accept it or leave EU" thing, right?
It's likely that the set with just GCSEs are largely going to be in or competing for jobs for which there are (or perhaps perceived to be) also migrants competing.
In 2011, 32% of recent EEA immigrants and 43% of non-EEA immigrants had university degrees, compared with 21% of the British adult population.
Or they're thickIt's likely that the set with just GCSEs are largely going to be in or competing for jobs for which there are (or perhaps perceived to be) also migrants competing.
Again, why do you think it will be that way? You seriously think all other EU countries want this at the moment? That is not happening. You'll see more and more laws and regulations becoming the same and after that maybe an EU president and such. That will be your United States of Europe. It will not be like the US at all. No country wants that at the moment.I know it will be a slow process, it won't be happen over night. But at the end of the day there will come a tipping point where the choice is put to the UK. Do we want to be part of the EU or do we want to leave. There will be no "oh stay as we are now" and at that point it will be too late to leave without facing complete and utter economic disaster which is why I say it is best to leave NOW rather than later.
And the EU didn't try to change that for countries that signed up previously, so what is the problem? Countries getting in now know they will have to adopt that and agree to it. Countries that are already in will not suddenly have their deal changed, it simply doesn't work that way. The UK at the moment has already special opt outs and such that the others don't have and nobody is trying to take it away from them.What you mean like the Euro and Schengen which are now MANDATORY. Sure the UK managed to negotiate an opt out years ago but things have changed. Both the Euro and Schengen are now mandatory for any country joining the EU. When they eventually have all 27 countries using the Euro and Schengen do you honestly think they will continue to allow the UK to have their special little opt outs ?
This is actually an issue in Eastern Europe last I heard. For example Poland has free higher education for everyone. Their youth goes there, gets educated on the universities and then bails the country to other places because they had better prospects there.Oddly enough, I saw this stat earlier which says they're just as much of a "threat" to the well educated.
I would still be pretty astonished if it didn't.
Leave would need a significant lead in the polls to counteract the conservatism and hedging of the last few days of the cycle, and it simply hasn't- in the best polls for Leave, they're slightly ahead in a neck and neck race, and I simply don't see that holding in the final days before the vote.
10 point lead apprantely, but treat it with caution as it is all Jeremy Corbyns fault apprantely. The issue seems to be Labour supporters not bothering to vote and Westminister are blaming him for his half hearted appraoch.... To be fair to him he is not really pro Europe so it is not fair to expect him to jump from the rafters to stay in
What you mean like the Euro and Schengen which are now MANDATORY. Sure the UK managed to negotiate an opt out years ago but things have changed. Both the Euro and Schengen are now mandatory for any country joining the EU. When they eventually have all 27 countries using the Euro and Schengen do you honestly think they will continue to allow the UK to have their special little opt outs ?
Reddit said:The poll also claims the turnout of the general election in London in 2015 was 87% (it wasn't it was 65%) and that UKIP got 11% of that vote (10% of the total electorate), they didn't, it was 8% of that vote (5% of the total electorate), so make of that what you will. It also claims that Labour and the Conservatives got the same number of votes at the general election in 2015 in London.
It also claims that 52% of 18 - 24 year olds own or have a mortgage on their own home.
Those numbers seem insane - I cannot imagine London will vote to leave Europe, given its demographics and makeup. It's the stronghold of young, liberal Labour.
Jeremy Corbyn has been asked if he'd rather have a knob for a nose or a nose for a knob.
He pushed for why there wasn't a third option.
I'm not sure how much stock you can put in that poll, especially given that Vote Leave themselves have said not to trust it.
It also makes a lot of highly unlike and outright wrong claims such as 12% lead for leave in London.
I work in Central London, and live out in Zone 6 - and I don't know a single person supporting Leave. My family up in Yorkshire know tonnes of people supporting Leave though.
From my very limited evidence - this demographics breakdown seems to be accurate:
![]()
got a source link please?