Gek54 said:Has it been confirmed that $59 will be the new standard MSRP of 360 games?
newsguy said:The question is: will it be a simple port?
Gek54 said:Has it been confirmed that $59 will be the new standard MSRP of 360 games?
:lol :lolWario64 said:i'll play it on this gen's consoles at $35 thank you
Why aren't you banned yet? That's a far more interesting question than your weak troll attempt.ram said:will people buy ports from current gen games still at playstation 3 launch??? :lol
ram said:ha ha ha - i like you...really :lol
sorry,, but i want real next gen games, not ea ports from current gen games. because you may have better textures, better effects, but the core gameplay will be the same - will be current gen.
but because i like you, i will buy a xbox360 at launch. :lol
cyberheater said:The idea of Burnout Revenge on 360 is mind blowing.
I can imagine trying to snake thru dozens of cars on screen and I would image the explosions and particle effects would be sumptous.
cyberheater said:The idea of Burnout Revenge on 360 is mind blowing.
I can imagine trying to snake thru dozens of cars on screen and I would image the explosions and particle effects would be sumptous.
Pedigree Chum said:I just hope that Criterion put some effort into it and it isn't a quick and dirty port.
ram said:do you really think, ea will make such an extra effort for a version that is not going to sell like ps2/xbox versions? i dont think so...
Wyzdom said:I don't know why but i feel an "upgraded port"...
Suikoguy said:Your assuming they are going to spend extra money on the 360 version.
I'd expect cleaner textures and a better framerate. Along with 720p support. What your talking about would require actual work by EA.
Gek54 said:Better framerate? Have any of the BOs had any problem maintaining a solid 60fps?
ram said:hopefully Pedigree Chum is right, and there is more than better textures and higher resolutions.
Suikoguy said:Maybe its just me, but I think they use blurring to make it seem faster then it is. The framerate is certainly solid either way.
COCKLES said:Don't care if it's identica lto Xbox version...as long as they put that extra power into 16 player Xbox live for 360![]()
Gek54 said:Has it been confirmed that $59 will be the new standard MSRP of 360 games?
brocke said:I'll believe it when they announce it. Right now it is most likely a mistake on EB's part.
I was at E3, and while playing Burnout Revenge, the attendee there hinted that they were working on a new Burnout game for Next Gen. "New" being the key word there. I then asked what next gen system it was for. He informed me that he couldn't let that info out. Right after that however he asked, "Have you seen the PS3 theater yet? Pretty cool huh?" Coincidence.... maybee... maybee not...
TheDiave said:Can they even make Burnout Revenge look better? The game looks awesome as it is.
When a current generation game comes out on multiple platforms, people routinely say that they will buy the "best-looking version," which seems to be a fairly uncontroversial opinion. (Usually, that system has been the Xbox, but there have been some exceptions.) In this case, you might have a game coming out for multiple platforms, and one of them happens to be Xbox 360....yet, all of a sudden, "buying the version which looks best" isn't the obvious choice? That's pretty damn funny.ram said:sorry,, but i want real next gen games, not ea ports from current gen games. because you may have better textures, better effects, but the core gameplay will be the same - will be current gen.
-jinx- said:So you're claiming that for something to be truly "next-gen," despite MASSIVELY upgraded graphics, there has to be something essentially different about the gameplay? If so, what is your definition of "next-gen gameplay?"