Foxy Fox 39
Banned
Has anyone played with the 1887's?
R2D4 said:Does anyone else have the problem were the game will pause for up to a second while playing MP? It happens maybe 1 out of 10 matches. It will just turn into a slide show. I can't tell if it is effecting other people or just me as well. I've never had that happen with any game before.
Foxy Fox 39 said:Has anyone played with the 1887's?
R2D4 said:Does anyone else have the problem were the game will pause for up to a second while playing MP? It happens maybe 1 out of 10 matches. It will just turn into a slide show. I can't tell if it is effecting other people or just me as well. I've never had that happen with any game before.
Gilatif said:Are the people with the modded clan tags going to get banned?
Gilatif said:Are the people with the modded clan tags going to get banned?
They're Meh at best.Foxy Fox 39 said:Has anyone played with the 1887's?
Bumblebeetuna said:Happens to me to on PS3. Especially bad in a firefight. Seems like lag or something, idk. I have lowered my screen resolution to 720p and turned off theater recording and it still happens.
R2D4 said:Does anyone else have the problem were the game will pause for up to a second while playing MP? It happens maybe 1 out of 10 matches. It will just turn into a slide show. I can't tell if it is effecting other people or just me as well. I've never had that happen with any game before.
R2D4 said:Does anyone else have the problem were the game will pause for up to a second while playing MP? It happens maybe 1 out of 10 matches. It will just turn into a slide show. I can't tell if it is effecting other people or just me as well. I've never had that happen with any game before.
I'm sorry, dude, but I'm getting so fucking sick of these condescending posts. We know how to play online FPS. We're not retarded and we can tell the difference between a lag death and a quick death by a powerful weapon.left_senseless said:I guess I'm the only one that doesn't have a million complaints about the game. sure, lag exists and is annoying, but it is a huge step up from black ops. and it is no worse than what exists in most online shooters. the problem with lag in this sort of game is how few bullets it takes to kill. if you are lagging hard then dumping a clip with no results when the expectation is quite the opposite, is hella frustrating. when you get hit by a flurry of shots it can feel like they were all one bullet. once you get used to these issues that will always exist then you can build strategies around them. it is a quick twitch shooter. it should be expected as such. I am an AR freak with the call of duty series, except cod2 which rocked with snipers and bolt action rifles, and I have no problem with medium to long range combat on most of the maps. I really like the maps so far. I've got about 12 hours invested now. explosive spam has been toned down. killstreaks have counter measures that are effective. knifing has been tuned a hair. for me mw3 is a huge step up from 2 even if it isn't quite what 1 was. which I haven't decided yet. call of duty 2 is still my favorite because it was more skill and less nonsense but that era of fps' is gone thanks to mw1.
overall I am really enjoying this game. I can't wait to get back to it and that is a first for me with cod since mw1 released. if any gaffers want to play shoot me an invite. I live in midwest america and my psn is agnosticscorpio.
SpacLock said:Well, they're not really modded. It's just a glitch from entering random characters as your clan tag. But yeah, they should be banned because of how stupid it looks.
18887 is okay. It is somewhat inconsistent, so you have be good at centering your shots as quickly and accurately as possible, but the 30-20 damage dropoff makes it get a suprising amount of two shot kills at 20 feet, especially with the range proficiency and steady aim.Foxy Fox 39 said:Has anyone played with the 1887's?
aku:jiki said:I'm sorry, dude, but I'm getting so fucking sick of these condescending posts. We know how to play online FPS
Mik2121 said:I buy the maps mostly to go through them in theater mode and take snaps of every corner, see how they model out the stuff and all that (I'm a 3D artist), but yeah, otherwise I would think twice about buying MW3 maps before seeing some videos first.
aku:jiki said:I'm sorry, dude, but I'm getting so fucking sick of these condescending posts. We know how to play online FPS. We're not retarded and we can tell the difference between a lag death and a quick death by a powerful weapon.
Like someone posted earlier, a quick bursted death (i.e. not a shotgun or a sniper rifle) results in a bunch of "thud" sounds and blood on your screen before you die. Even if it's very fast, it's still there. A lag kill is you just dropping dead with no thuds and no blood.
I don't know how you apologists are unable to tell the difference. When you round a corner and a guy kills you at double lightspeed, do you honestly think that guy is THAT good? Watch your killcams! He isn't!
Forsaken82 said:I don't necessarily hate the maps, but my biggest gripe is the fact that it takes me forever to spot air support. It seems like there is always an obstruction somewhere on the map that requires me to go 30 seconds out of my way to find it. Even on Villiage, which seems like a fairly open and non vertically challenged map (minus the caverns of course).
Chittagong said:I don't really mind having to unload half a clip into an enemy to make them die. I just pretend it's part of the game, compensate for it and prentend the enemies have to do the same.
My stats are awful. I have no idea if MW2 was coded better or what, but I do know the different weapon options gave me the ability to use different strategies when my connection failed me.Kermit The Dog said:Well, you don't, according to your stats.
Let's not pretend that your location has something to do with it. I'm in Australia and the performance has been second to none. Host migration works every time, no lag, zero ghost bullets and almost 100% of the time, 4 green bars. I can't be more complimentary, performance wise.
Those maps though...
I am definitely liking this game a lot and finding it mostly well balanced, but there are still a few things that need fixing:left_senseless said:I guess I'm the only one that doesn't have a million complaints about the game. sure, lag exists and is annoying, but it is a huge step up from black ops. and it is no worse than what exists in most online shooters. the problem with lag in this sort of game is how few bullets it takes to kill. if you are lagging hard then dumping a clip with no results when the expectation is quite the opposite, is hella frustrating. when you get hit by a flurry of shots it can feel like they were all one bullet. once you get used to these issues that will always exist then you can build strategies around them. it is a quick twitch shooter. it should be expected as such. I am an AR freak with the call of duty series, except cod2 which rocked with snipers and bolt action rifles, and I have no problem with medium to long range combat on most of the maps. I really like the maps so far. I've got about 12 hours invested now. explosive spam has been toned down. killstreaks have counter measures that are effective. knifing has been tuned a hair. for me mw3 is a huge step up from 2 even if it isn't quite what 1 was. which I haven't decided yet. call of duty 2 is still my favorite because it was more skill and less nonsense but that era of fps' is gone thanks to mw1.
overall I am really enjoying this game. I can't wait to get back to it and that is a first for me with cod since mw1 released. if any gaffers want to play shoot me an invite. I live in midwest america and my psn is agnosticscorpio.
Chittagong said:I don't really mind having to unload half a clip into an enemy to make them die. I just pretend it's part of the game, compensate for it and prentend the enemies have to do the same.
Foxy Fox 39 said:Has anyone played with the 1887's?
SlackAdjuster said:Nope. I dont have a million complaints either. Maybe a few. I dont like the lack of HC Free For All. What really bothers methe most is: I dont like whenever I'm in a party with my one certain good friend, I do significantly worse than usual, ALL the time. It has to be some sort of host/lag issue, I'm not sure. Because this only happens when he's in the party. Anyone else, or playing by myself with random people: its not an issue. And it really sucks because its fun playing with my best buddy but its not so fun when I'm 7-10 every game.
But overall I'm having a blast with this game. I love Kill Confirmed. I love the Spec Ops (some of these missions are absolute fucking torture on Veteran)
left_senseless said:I agree with this and is what I was saying. it's an online game. expect lag and incorporate it into your strategies.
R2D4 said:Yep. Same shit happens in BF3 and BC2 and MW2 and MW and etc....
BattleMonkey said:When it happens alot, it's just making excuses for crappy netcode. There is no strategy to deal with lag bullshit. People spend their money wanting their games to work
Working fine? Are apologists even trying anymore?rCIZZLE said:My game is working perfectly fine. Maybe like 1/10 new matches I run into a bad host and it boots me out but soon as I get in a game I'm good until I'm hungry/tired.
We are apologists because we don't have that many issues with the connection?Mr. B Natural said:Working fine? Are apologists even trying anymore?
The game even FEELS different when you're host, like BLOPs did. There is CLEAR input lag when you're not host and 3 bars in this game is a death sentence and 4 bars doesn't mean a damn thing either because anything less is abysmal. Let's not talk about ground war, not even worth it.
This is a safe sequel. Safe sequels should IMPROVE on things like connection and lag, not be worse than the predecessors. People's standards are so low these days that if the game works, it's great. Unbelievable.
Mr. B Natural said:Working fine? Are apologists even trying anymore?
The game even FEELS different when you're host, like BLOPs did. There is CLEAR input lag when you're not host and 3 bars in this game is a death sentence and 4 bars doesn't mean a damn thing either because anything less is abysmal. Let's not talk about ground war, not even worth it.
This is a safe sequel. Safe sequels should IMPROVE on things like connection and lag, not be worse than the predecessors. People's standards are so low these days that if the game works, it's great. Unbelievable. This game doesn't even have the excuses like the maps being too big, or too many players, or the graphics are just too damn good.
basic_element said:I really suck at this game. I'm talking like 1 kill 20 deaths bad. Any advice on how to do better? Is it just a matter of playing the game more? Right now I'm at level 8. Any recommendations on what weapon I should be using?
What's your set-up?basic_element said:I really suck at this game. I'm talking like 1 kill 20 deaths bad. Any advice on how to do better? Is it just a matter of playing the game more? Right now I'm at level 8. Any recommendations on what weapon I should be using?