• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Canadian General Election (OT) - #elxn42: October 19, 2015

Status
Not open for further replies.

firehawk12

Subete no aware
Harper pulled off plenty when he had a minority. There's very little difference, really. He just rams everything through as a confidence vote knowing that voters will blame the opposition party who votes it down if it results in an election. And it works because our democracy is basically no longer functional. Especially if the bloc comes back.

Congrats, gutter. You got what you wanted I guess, a resurgent Bloc and a conservative majority in the cards again. You must be so happy. Your ridiculous scorched earth approach to national unity wins the day again.
I blame the Liberals and the NDP.

And yes, a Conservative minority will mean nothing because I doubt either losing party will want to be responsible to collapsing the government. I expect the NDP will begin to have leadership questions anyway.
 
I blame the Liberals and the NDP.

And yes, a Conservative minority will mean nothing because I doubt either losing party will want to be responsible to collapsing the government. I expect the NDP will begin to have leadership questions anyway.
firehawk is more correct

the NDP is trying to become something it is not by trying to be Liberal-lite in the Center. It is not the NDP it used to be with Mulcair.

while the Liberals veered too much towards the Center-Right during the tail end of their last Governments that alienated the Center-Left voters who went meh I don't care about the Liberals anymore after 2006.

Justin is trying to recoop scorched earth by running to the Center-Left away from the Paul Martin scale.
 
So apparently the NDP doesn't want my vote anymore...

NDP offers Quebec alone right to opt out of federally-funded programs

OTTAWA — An NDP government would allow Quebec — but no other province — to opt out of new federally-funded social programs and receive its share of the money with no strings attached.

The policy reflects the NDP's full embrace of asymmetrical federalism and is a marked departure from the approach taken by Conservative and Liberal governments, which have generally been careful to give all provinces the ability to opt out, even if Quebec was typically the only one to take up the offer.

NDP Leader Tom Mulcair has confirmed that the policy would apply to his promises to boost funding to the provinces for health care initiatives, including creation of a national prescription drug plan.

But that could be a recipe for conflict with the other provinces. Already, Ontario is signalling that it would demand equal treatment.

"We welcome new health care investment," said a spokesperson for Premier Kathleen Wynne's office. "We would expect that the same rules apply to all provinces."

http://www.nationalnewswatch.com/20...derally-funded-programs/#.Vg7xIfx-y7R.twitter
 

Apathy

Member
Holy Christ is this Conservative Party for fucking real?

It's a new level of, red scare, McCarthyism, snitch on your neighbours crap.


So apparently the NDP doesn't want my vote anymore...

Well thats one way to piss off other provinces. Keep on digging that hole Tom. So much for the NDP treating everyone equally. Geeze, free tip, even if Quebec was the only province to step up and opt out of things when offered, you still offer it to everyone as a choice.
 
firehawk is more correct

the NDP is trying to become something it is not by trying to be Liberal-lite in the Center. It is not the NDP it used to be with Mulcair.

while the Liberals veered too much towards the Center-Right during the tail end of their last Governments that alienated the Center-Left voters who went meh I don't care about the Liberals anymore after 2006.

Justin is trying to recoop scorched earth by running to the Center-Left away from the Paul Martin scale.

The Liberals veered centre-right as soon as they were elected in 1993. Their whole balanced-budget platform in the 90s was built on the back of slashing public services and funding. Yes the deficits were caused by the PCs, but the Liberals were the conservatives in that case. Socially they were fairly liberal, but not overly so. The Liberals of the 90s were basically PCs.
 

Zips

Member
Mulcair seems to have just totally tossed things by throwing so much random stuff at the wall to hope things would work that it's not even clear what the NDP is doing.

If the Conservatives win again, Canada is unbelievably dumb.
 

Apathy

Member
Everything else about their platform is perfectly acceptable and rational in my opinion.

This is like they are trying to pry the vote from me themselves.

It doesn't even really make any sense for their own chances.

We, as second class provinces are not to question the eternal wisdom of Tom and his NDP. Clearly Quebec deserves all that extra attention.

Good luck everywhere else NDP, you're going to need it.
 
NDP under Mulcair reminds me allot of Robert Bourassa's rule as Premier

want to stay in Canada but willing to make concessions to nationalists just to appease them.

Pierre Trudeau once called Robert Bourassa a ''Mangeur de hot dog''

that is what Mulcair is today, un ''mangeur de hot dog''
 
I'm gonna put on my tinfoil hat for a second because this move doesn't make any sense and could lead to a significant shift in the political landscape.

Mulcair is solidifying his support in Quebec and trying to get swing voters elsewhere to give us a Liberal minority.

He knows a Conservative minority would likely put us back into another election in short order, but a Liberal minority would supplant Harper.
 

Tiktaalik

Member
I would be insane if a political party won an election without Ontario and Quebec one day.What will gutter_trash say about that since he's so Ontario and Quebec focused always.There have been instances in the past were political parties got official opposition status without either Ontario and Quebec if I recall.

Conservatives won in 2006 even though they got 2nd place in Ontario and 3rd in Quebec. But I thought if you won Ontario you automatically won the election! How was this victory possible?!?!?!



Re: Quebec Opt out: That is a terrible Hail Mary promise to Quebec by Mulcair, but I guess now would be the time to take big risks. I don't approve.

This is not going to be popular in the West, but on the other hand sometimes the West really doesn't care about what goes on in Quebec so maybe no one will notice.

Quebec already has a great deal of special powers other provinces don't (i.e. Immigration), so this isn't super unprecedented.
 

Tiktaalik

Member
The Reform party got huge support with a decentralization platform, and that's continued with the Conservatives.

It makes sense strategically for the NDP to adopt a decentralization point of view to differentiate themselves from the centralist Liberals, but I have no idea why this should apply only to Quebec.
 

mo60

Member
I found this poll by Innovative Research Group that makes the Liberals in the lead with 31% while the NDP and CPC are tied at 29% each.Someone simulator on reddit based off of this poll gives the election win to the NDP while the conservatives and the liberals are in second and third respectively.
http://www.innovativeresearch.ca/si... xlsx/151002_IRG29 Wave 5 Horserace Deck2.pdf

If you want to know the seat count for each party based off of this poll here it is.

113 NDP 112 CPC and 109 L

Take this poll with a grain of salt.
 

mo60

Member
Conservatives won in 2006 even though they got 2nd place in Ontario and 3rd in Quebec. But I thought if you won Ontario you automatically won the election! How was this victory possible?!?!?!.

If I remember the only reason they won was mostly because of the West while they improved their seat count in places like Ontario.
 

Vamphuntr

Member
NDP under Mulcair reminds me allot of Robert Bourassa's rule as Premier

want to stay in Canada but willing to make concessions to nationalists just to appease them.

Pierre Trudeau once called Robert Bourassa a ''Mangeur de hot dog''

that is what Mulcair is today, un ''mangeur de hot dog''

He pretty much called all francophones that. It's no wonder he's still reviled by some people here. My dad loathed him so much that he wanted to go spit on his grave when he kicked the bucket.

The Mulcair thing is probably related to the latest liberal attack ad on TV. They attacked him on his program for daycare which QC already have. Same for drugs/medication healthcare, we already have those so I can understand why he wants to do something different here but you cannot do this in a country where everyone is supposed to be equal.

What time does the French debate start?

8pm
 

Mailbox

Member
I think the biggest problem that Canada has with regards to elections (other than the system itself) is that the general public rarely ever know the kind of shit the government does.

Information destruction, science nullification, etc. Is unknown to the general public at all. The voting population is ignorant to the crap that has happened, and that's not okay.
 

mo60

Member
http://www.strategicvoting.ca/alldistricts.php

That site any good?

Cause 1st priority is getting Harper out of office.
Don't vote with your heart, vote with your brain.

Really hope that site is legit.

It's weird how this site is showing how it's best to vote for the NDP in my riding while in a lot of polls it showing either a close race between the independent candidate, the NDP candidate and Liberal candidate second or the independent candidate in second place while the NDP candidate and Liberals are far back.
 

MutFox

Banned
It's weird how this site is showing how it's best to vote for the NDP in my riding while in a lot of polls it showing either a close race between the independent candidate, the NDP candidate and Liberal candidate second or the independent candidate in second place while the NDP candidate and Liberals are far back.

Yeah, it was correct for my riding, but not sure about the others.
Cause it could be a dangerous site if it screws up others voting.
 

MutFox

Banned
I'm not sure.
They say to vote Liberal in mine which is wrong because they use 2011 data and the 2011 Liberal candidate is now the NPD candidate.
Knowing that, NPD is the clear winner and they are pretty much wrong.

Could it be taken from Projections?
Cause I looked at projections and it looked correct for my riding.

Problem is there's no polls per riding.

Seems to be the best site I've seen for this.
We need sites like this though.
 

NetMapel

Guilty White Male Mods Gave Me This Tag
NDP you done goofed. This is why the west don't vote for Liberal or NDP parties. They never care about us and always pander to Quebec. I'm voting Liberal anyways because at least Trudeau wants to fund us a very important skytrain line and also improve our infrastructure in general. My current riding in Vancouver is leaning Liberals so I am sticking to that. I have always voted Liberal and was close to voting NDP this time because of my desire to vote out Harper. Howeve, this is simply unacceptable.
 

elty

Member
I'm not sure.
They say to vote Liberal in mine which is wrong because they use 2011 data and the 2011 Liberal candidate is now the NPD candidate.
Knowing that, NPD is the clear winner and they are pretty much wrong.
I though people usually vote the party, unless it is someone famous.
 
I don't think you can do that? Even if Harper lost the election, he can sign crap as long as he is the PM.

Yes and no. They can sign, but you still need to vote the trade agreement into law within Parliament. A new government can refuse to adopt the law, thus abandoning it.
 

Pedrito

Member
I think the biggest problem that Canada has with regards to elections (other than the system itself) is that the general public rarely ever know the kind of shit the government does.

Information destruction, science nullification, etc. Is unknown to the general public at all. The voting population is ignorant to the crap that has happened, and that's not okay.

Yes.

And if you really think about it, Harper's most awful policies and scandals don't affect the life of 95% of the population in any tangible way.
C-51, C-26, the secrecy, the fair election act, the omnibus bills, the F-35 fiasco, the spending scandal, the ridiculous criminal legislation, the CBC cuts, etc. They have very little effect on our day-to-day life.

The only exception is the employment insurance reform and you can see it by the score of CPC in the Atlantic provinces.
 

Kifimbo

Member
New Ekos, similar to the last one.

20151002_slide01.jpg
 
the biggest funny part of this election is that it hangs in the balance of a TVA debate LOL .
a PKP owned network with Brian Mulroney in the board of directors of the company
 

Tiktaalik

Member
Worth a read.

Zunera Ishaq on why she fought to wear a niqab during citizenship ceremony: ‘A personal attack on me and Muslim women’

There are a few things Zunera Ishaq wants to set straight about the veil she wears in public.

Nobody is forcing her to cover up, she says. It is a “personal choice” and a way to assert her identity and show her devotion to her Muslim faith.

There is nothing oppressive, either, about wearing a niqab. If anything, it is a “symbol of empowerment.”

....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom