Yup.No promise to repeal c-51. No vote
If they don't say they'll repeal it, then I don't trust them to "gut" it enough to make any significant changes. Otherwise, why not just outright repeal it? Because it would make Trudeau look like a hypocrite because he voted for it?
I don't know who I want to vote for, but I'm somewhere between Liberal and NDP, I guess.
Harper needs to go. He's destroying the Canadian identity.
How is that graph usable? I mean, I don't understand how a party can possibly be socially conservative but economically left. Would China be an example?
NDP is getting less appealing to me lately, but I still find them most appealing. The whole "no deficits ever" thing plus starting to create attack ads after shunning the practice.
Social policy is important to me, as are workers' rights, and they feel the most progressive in these areas.
How is that graph usable? I mean, I don't understand how a party can possibly be socially conservative but economically left. Would China be an example?
The NDP already has the reputation as a party that would spend much more than other parties. The Conservatives would love to latch onto some quote by Mulcair that they could use to portray him as being overly loose with the public purse.
It feels likely to me that Mulcair's responses to the deficit question are designed to avoid creating soundbites that can be used against him.
If fully costed out platforms are released this election then we'll see what this "no deficit in our first budget" pledge really means. "No deficit" doesn't mean austerity and cuts, it just means that revenue covers expenses. Presumably the NDP believe they have found a way to generate enough revenue to cover the costs of their new programs.
I kindof feel like I want to get more involved in this election, to at least help get Harper out, but I don't know which party I would aim to help.
I don't like that Trudeau is in this largely because of recognition for his family, and he hasn't come across as a great leader in his own right. He's made stupid mistakes and it seems like much of what he does is just following what his advisors are telling him to do from behind the curtain. He just seems hollow.
Mulcair seems to just be throwing out ideas to try and see what sticks, to where he is making unrealistic election promises, and I really hate it when politicians do that to win votes (and that people fall for it).
So neither party has a leader I'm overly eager to support right now, yet I feel I should get more involved somehow.
Edit: Also - am I the only one who has been annoyed by Wynne injecting herself into the discussion? I don't know what she's thinking - She should be letting Trudeau do the talking. It makes him look weak.
Yeah this CBC Vote Compass is definitely the most well made one I've seen so far.
I started the vote compass test but stopped. I'm not sure of how I feel on some things, and it seems like it'll take a while so I plan to do it later.
How long is it?
30 initial questions then 16 about the parties and then over 20 about your demographic. 5 minutes tops.I started the vote compass test but stopped. I'm not sure of how I feel on some things, and it seems like it'll take a while so I plan to do it later.
How long is it?
Would your attitude change if there was PR?It's just not happening, Greens.
It's just not happening, Greens.
Speaking of which, I'm getting there.Maybe Pope Francis could start a political party? There have to be examples of that situation somewhere in the world.
Extremely unlikely unless it's part of a wider North American network (Toronto-Chicago, Montreal-Boston-NY, etc.). There just isn't enough demand, otherwise.
EDIT: our country is not dense enough for us to have high speed rail and other "efficient" ways to connect cities. Best way is to have regional networks like Northwest (Vancouver, Seattle, Portland), Northeast (NY, BOS, WASH, PHI, TOR, MTL), Midwest, etc. and so on. And even then, this would cost a pretty penny and wouldn't necessarily be more efficient given the distances.
I still have a hard time thinking that Martin and Chretien were 100% innocent. Regardless, corruption is rampant which I guess was my point.
Again, CPC shouldn't be blamed for the "recession". Canada has always been a commodity-driven economy, even under the Chretien years. Not sure why the CPC should be blamed for, effectively, China's and the Brent's woes.
Bracing for gutter to tell me how wrong I am.
I'm voting liberal or NDP
It's interesting that we're in a Conservative government yet there's only 1 party that's conservative. The 3 others are nearly the polar opposite.
that Ontario battlePosted?
http://abacusdata.ca/race-narrows-as-ndp-support-dips/
31% NDP
30% CPC
28% Libs
NDP leads in QC, three-way race with Libs in lead in Ontario, CPC leads in all Western Provinces, with BC being the closest race. Atlantic Canada is solidly Liberal.
Norway is pretty much a one-trick pony and now that oil isn't doing so well, they are starting to suffer. Sweden has huge immigration problems and Finland... is Finland.
Not sure Canada should follow their path at all.
If the Abacus poll is any indication things are tightening up.
In b4 three way split and another Conservative government.
This poll does have low samples though, and the BC numbers look a bit odd.
Still fits the general trend of whats been observed in all the other two polls - Three way race in Ontario, NDP leading in QC, two-way race between NDP/CPC in BC, and CPC domination in the prairies. The national trend seems to be that the Libs are slowly picking up steam, with the CPC starting to lose momentum.
Good lord, let it be a NDP win with Lib opp
Posted?
http://abacusdata.ca/race-narrows-as-ndp-support-dips/
31% NDP
30% CPC
28% Libs
NDP leads in QC, three-way race with Libs in lead in Ontario, CPC leads in all Western Provinces, with BC being the closest race. Atlantic Canada is solidly Liberal.
Vancouver Island will swing full Green and let the Conservatives sneak up the middle I can just feel it.