I'm sorry man but I can't take you seriously with this statement, what if a woman LIKES to do "sexualized" art? What if a man also likes to do it? Does it mean they're poor artists? They only do that kind of art for money?
There are so many different artists in the world that I can't fathom how you are able to get to that statement.
If they like to do sexualized art awesome.
If they do OBJECTIFICATION on their designs for no reason, it is a bad design.
Also if ANYONE does objectification of women on a drawing or a design for no reason, they are reproducing systematic sexism by choice or by briefing. Whatever they are men or women
No offense Platy, but it seems like you're trying to push your idea/assumptions onto the artist as an explanation for her changing designs. Lots of artists evolve. Not always from external pressures or anything like that, but just based on their own personal tastes. I very much doubt a well known industry artist is being coerced into making designs increasingly more sexual because of systemic sexism or anything like that. I doubt they're entirely based on unconscious desires to "fall in line" with what is popular in the industry at the time. Maybe she just likes making those types of designs
In the 2010 interview she gave for the SF20 The Art of Street Fighter artbook, Kinu mentions that what she likes the most in her art is to emulate early akiman art.
Code of Princess was released 2 years after that interview. So it was wat, 1 year before she created the designs ?
She does not mention that she likes to draw sexy women, objectify her art, draw naked breasts or anything.
She mentiones early akiman

People are just mentioning that she must like to draw sexy stuff but nobody is giving any interview or PROOF that she likes those stuff.
edit : this is her twitter
https://twitter.com/nishi_katsu
Look at what she retweets, what she likes .... the only time you see objectified women or impossible armor are when she retweets her own game work !