For me, it really depends on what you liked.
If you liked the combat, the well-directed cutscenes and voice acting (sans Captain Picard lol), the music, and the art design, yes. The combat in LoS2 is dramatically improved. The performance on console is improved. The problem is that the game is split into two segments: a "modern" day Castlevania City (yes) where you have some element of stealth gameplay, of...I dunno, other dumb shit, and so on, and a "past" group of segments that take place in and around Castlevania and feature gothic architecture and stuff like that.
The past stuff is great and the core combat gameplay is much improved.
The modern day stuff is just so plodding and repetitive that it hurts the overall game. I think Lords of Shadow is like an 7 or an 8 and Lords of Shadow 2 is like a 6 or 7, but for different reasons. LoS has a lot of heart and it is a seriously meaty game, and it released after years of IGA doing basically nothing. LoS2 lost the creativity and added a bunch of crap, but it really did refine the core of the game.
BOTH games needed a lot of editing.