SolidusDave
Member
Htown said:So how is Indiana Jones not banned on the DVD list? Swastikas and Nazi imagery all up ins.
Movies, tv shows, comedy etc. are considered as art, so it's ok for them to show Nazi stuff.
Htown said:So how is Indiana Jones not banned on the DVD list? Swastikas and Nazi imagery all up ins.
I can't think of another country that has dealt with it's past as thoroughly as Germany. Seriously. Look at Japan, they still act like the shit they did in mainland Asia never happened. Read the Wikipedia article on the Yasukini Shrine and the museum close by. It's a joke.ymmv said:C'm on, Germany, learn to deal with your past!
They're trying to prevent a return of fascism by banning books, games and movies. Does anyone else see the irony of that?Rufus said:I can't think of another country that has dealt with it's past as thoroughly as Germany. Seriously. Look at Japan, they still act like the shit they did in mainland Asia never happened. Read the Wikipedia article on the Yasukini Shrine and the museum close by. It's a joke.
Germans being touchy about swastikas has nothing to do with wanting to forget anything ever happened, it's trivializing it that authorities get upset over when it comes to depictions of it in many media. It can only be shown for scholarly reasons. It is supposed to be taken seriously in perpetuity.
There's a very illuminating article on Wikipedia about the German law on this subject: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strafgesetzbuch_§_86a
Actually never a book as far as I know was banned except for those who glorified the events neither a movie was banned because of that.SapientWolf said:They're trying to prevent a return of fascism by banning books, games and movies. Does anyone else see the irony of that?
bandresen said:In Germany it's also illegal to publicly deny the holocaust.
bandresen said:In Germany it's also illegal to publicly deny the holocaust.
A great example of how valued free speech is in this democracy. ;-)
In France too,and frankly I don't see the problem.bandresen said:In Germany it's also illegal to publicly deny the holocaust.
A great example of how valued free speech is in this democracy. ;-)
Kurtofan said:In France too,and frankly I don't see the problem.
And we should be able to punish them for being fuckwits,especially when they're politicians.jim-jam bongs said:Fuckwits should be free to self-declare imo
Pennywise said:It's somewhat sad if you compare that fact that even satiricial comedy shows can show those swastikas without a problem.
Kurtofan said:And we should be able to punish them for being fuckwits,especially when they're politicians.
Eh if racism is outlawed I don't see why negationnism(which is thinly veiled antisemitism) shouldn't.jim-jam bongs said:If it's incitement, sure. But punishing someone for holding and expressing a belief that you find abhorrent is some 1984 shit.
Sabotaging freedom of speech is enough of a reason for me.Pennywise said:@bandresen
I agree that is awful in the way it sabotages the freedom of speech , but on the other hand is there a reason to deny it ?
And ironically, this seems like a thing Nazi Germany would do. :lolBocoDragon said:You gotta love how Germany is still paying for World War II (and by extension WWI). I know they're doing this censorship to themselves, but it's still in the spirit of post-war controls on society to prevent more bad Nazi-like things from happening...
Beliefs aren't outlawed, unless they've already progressed to punishing thoughtcrime.Kurtofan said:Eh if racism is outlawed I don't see why negationnism(which is thinly veiled antisemitism) shouldn't.
Flek said:Yeha germany in some parts is the same as china etc. They even talked about a internet censoring thing here, where providers would have been forced to block websites. They said officially "only against cp"
It's not in effect yet. This is the latest information on it that I know of:SolidusDave said:That's actually in effect since a year or so
But many countries do this, e.g. Norway, Sweden, Netherlands, Italy, UK, USA, Swiss, South Korea, Canada.
(of course it's completely useless)
bandresen said:It's not in effect yet. This is the latest information on it that I know of:
http://www.maerkischeallgemeine.de/...rlisten-fuer-Kinderporno-Seiten-sind-vom.html
Did that change? Glancing at the wikipedia article about this issue doesn't say so.