Am I seriously picking GA Tech in a bowl game? Someone smack me upside the head, please.
They're 3/4 (Nebraska). They're in the middle of a fertile recruiting area (Penn/Maryland/NJ/); and they're stadium holds over 100k. The big problem for them right now is that they're number 3 in their division. MSU is obviously playing better than them, but the long term prospects will be better for PSU then MSU.
edit. I think Nebraska needs to show something soon, I really think they needed Okie/Texas pretty badly.
@sekrah Bill O'Brien has informed his staff that he will be accepting Texans job.
womp womp womp
I can only hope we get another candidate that can bring in the recruits and did what Bill O'Brien did. I wonder how Hackenberg develops now. McGloin last year and Hackenberg freshman year wouldnt been nearly successful without him imo
I think I just still have trouble imagining Ole Miss being good enough to even make a bowl game, let alone win one.
Of course, triple option = bowl doom, so yeah.
:/
Franklin is the perfect fit for you guys. Young, offensive guy who got Vanderbilt going in the sec, and is from Eastern PA, and has plenty of ties in Maryland back in the day.
It would almost be worth it for the reactions of Texas fans on shaggy bevo.Well, it is one of the top 3 or 4 destination jobs in the sport, so this would make sense.
I get that. I said earlier in this thread or another that I don't see why an NFL coach would want to go to college and have to deal with recruiting, but if you do go, and you go to a school like Penn State, you stick around. O'Brien wasn't a head coach in the NFL, so maybe college was his best next move at the time. But Penn State, after 114 years of Paterno roaming the sidelines, isn't the school for you if you want to use it as a spring board. Go to Pitt. or Rutgers.
Well shit, Roby is listed as a game time decision due to knew injury in B1G champ. Our starting DE didnt make the trip, and now a stomach bug is going around the team.
Where is the GT/Ole Miss game being played and how long before kickoff are those images.
Sactions are up in 2 years, and they haven't fallen to mediocrity, and certainly not as quickly as feared. Maybe I hold Penn State in higher esteem than the rest of yall, but that seems like a job big enough to not leave. I wouldn't leave an Alabama or a USC to go there, but I wouldn't leave Penn State to go to one of those jobs, either (or, rather, it would take much longer than 2 years to leave). I don't know, that school is somewhere in my top 10 college football jobs, and it would take decades of bad hires and mediocrity for them to fall out of it.
All I'm saying is that if the college life isn't where you want to be, you don't take the Penn State job in the first place. Go to Pittsburgh.
I dunno, I honestly can't place Penn State in my top 10 college jobs, I mean it isn't even the best job in its own conference.
I also think that in the current college football landscape its getting harder to be competitive for cold weather programs and mid western teams. Maybe that's just me.
There are definitely at least ten better jobs than Penn St, especially now.
Pac: USC, UCLA, U Dub, Oregon
Big 12: Texas, Oklahoma
B1G: Ohio St, Michigan, maybe Nebraska
ACC: Florida St, Clemson, maybe Miami
SEC: Bama, Florida, LSU, UGA, probably ATM & Auburn
Just off the top of my head. There are probably even more that are on the same level as Penn.
There are definitely at least ten better jobs than Penn St, especially now.
Pac: USC, UCLA, U Dub, Oregon
Big 12: Texas, Oklahoma
B1G: Ohio St, Michigan, maybe Nebraska
ACC: Florida St, Clemson, maybe Miami
SEC: Bama, Florida, LSU, UGA, probably ATM & Auburn
Just off the top of my head. There are probably even more that are on the same level as Penn.
You can't say that Udub/UCLA/Oregon are on the same level as PSU, but they're not better jobs.
I think people underestimate how bad a job Paterno was doing at the end of his run, but PSU has some huge advantages that most of these other schools don't have.
It takes more than 2 or 5 or even 10 years of winning to elevate yourself, just as it takes more than 2 or 5 or even 10 years of losing to make yourself irrelevant. At least for me. To me, those PAC-12 schools are flavor of the month after USC, they're the big dog. Nebraska, I'd say, is on the verge of falling off because of each successive hire after Osborne left. I can't put Clemson up there. Miami is a tough one. On the one hand, they've had a lot of historical success. On the other, they've had a lot of sanctions, thuggery, and apparently none of their fans are actually anywhere near Miami, certainly not in the stadium on a Saturday afternoon. The SEC schools are all so darn interchangeable. It's the destination conference, for sure, but I don't know about the schools after Alabama and maybe Florida, who I'm hesitant to include. I'd feel better about it if Spurrier was still there, which should reveal another important criteria for me, if it wasn't evident already. Destination jobs are quite often created by a person who held it before. If anything, there have to be some pretty big, well tenured shoes to fill.
I don't see how Penn State, in the midst of a thousand years of sanctions, is a better gig than coaching in the NFL. Especially since he's taking over a Texans team that isn't in as bad of shape as most NFL teams that fire their coaches.
You also have the recent run of coaches in their first year in the NFL after successful stints at college leading their teams to the playoffs, vs the whole thing where Penn State can't even play in a mid tier Bowl game for several more years.
From a pure prestige perspective, leading the Texans into the playoffs next year is probably more enticing than gutting out another half dozen 7-5 seasons at Penn State. Plus now he doesn't have to deal with the inevitability of them being irrelevant and mediocre once the sanctions are up.
What advantages does Penn State have over say UCLA?
Hey hey now. Its 2 more years of bowl bans and the idiots even decided to let us have more scholarships faster than the original penalty!
As for what deciding what level Penn St is one has to consider that most the great programs are going to sewn up for years to come. So a up and coming coach might have Penn St as his best option really. One thing this page has made me giggle at, is an Ohio St fan of all people is the only one voicing it out for Penn St favor.
I think Penn State is/was a destination job. The Sandusky thing has taken a lot of the luster from the program for me. Prior to that, absolutely. But that's mostly based on Joe-Pa and how long he'd been there. It's hard to recruit players at cold weather schools, and I don't think they're as highly rated as Ohio State or Michigan, unless you're from PA, of course.
I think Penn State is/was a destination job. The Sandusky thing has taken a lot of the luster from the program for me. Prior to that, absolutely. But that's mostly based on Joe-Pa and how long he'd been there. It's hard to recruit players at cold weather schools, and I don't think they're as highly rated as Ohio State or Michigan, unless you're from PA, of course.
Cyan, I don't think Washington is a destination job. They don't fit any of my criteria anyway.
One thing this page has made me giggle at, is an Ohio St fan of all people is the only one voicing it out for Penn St favor.
Bill O'Brien seemed to be doing just fine even on restrictions and so did Joe Paterno.
PSU is pretty easy to as their's enough local talent in the surrounding states. The reason they wren't recruiting well was because Paterno and his staff were old and lazy.
I'm offended!
Do not accuse me of pulling for (the) Ohio State (university). Duke, Florida State, big time ACC homer. I am hoping (although not expecting) for Clemson to bring the wood later this week.
It all makes sense now. I knew it was weird a tosu fan saying anything remotely positive
He's a GA Tech fan, IIRC. If they actually have those.
Obviously they've had a rough time of it with scholarships, but going 7-5 in a down Big Ten isn't exactly lighting things on fire. I think you're reading a little too much into my comments. I think Penn State is still a destination job.
Oh I agree. Paterno was a weight to the program the last few years and they would have been better off if he'd retired earlier, but obviously they can't fire him. He was Penn State personified.
Not looking great. I think this one will be within a field goal or touchdown.I picked GA Tech for 23 :|
1. Not playing in the same city as USC. PSU is by far the dominant power in Penn, Southern NJ, and good parts of Maryland. These are good recruiting states that they are the clear alpha dog in.
2. Their fanbase is loyally insane, you see the defense of the rapedom in Pennsyltucky. That's not going to happen in LA. Mind you most normal people will see this as a detriment, but we're talking about job security for coaches so it's a plus here.
They're also have well heeled alumni and they can sit a billion in their stadium, but that's a plus UCLA has as well, but other schools on that list don't have.
I picked GA Tech for 23 :|
Georgia Tech is 1-4 in bowl games under Paul Johnson, 1-7 in their last 8 bowls overall. Coaches with time to prepare usually prepare well against them. The lone exception was last year when Tech beat USC, who now has a new coach.
I feel like having second pick of recruits in SoCal is probably still better than first pick of recruits in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Maryland.
So basically Penn State has a rabidly loyal fan base. So that puts them on par with most of the SEC.