sf2fanatic
Member
Got a text from an USC fan saying we got gifts in the first half.....
LOL!!!
LOL!!!
Maybe the ACC will do something about it after the fact.Pretty much every refereeing "expert" that networks employ these days say he should've been ejected.
I see.
Because his behavior is "hilarious." Ask our FSU fans.Holy shit I just saw the clip of Jameis shoving the ref out of the way. How does he not get ejected? Does the ref work for the Tallahassee Police Department?
kicker's left foot was offside.
Got a text from an USC fan saying we got gifts in the first half.....
LOL!!!
kicker's left foot was offside.
I'm laughing at all of the people on ND boards who want to fire Brian Kelly. If the school was stupid enough to do it, I probably couldn't even list all of the schools who would gladly hire him.
I had to explain to a subway alum that losing by three to a ranked team when you had a chance to make an easy field goal does not count as a "crushing defeat."Remember if your coach doesn't bring you a playoff every year, they're pretty much worthless and overrated.
Because his behavior is "hilarious." Ask our FSU fans.
(THU) Kansas State @ West Virginia by 7
(THU) North Carolina @ Duke by 7
Minnesota @ Nebraska by 7
Boston College @ Florida State by 14
Arizona @ Utah by 4
Stanford @ California by 4 (why not)
Louisville @ Notre Dame by 4
Wisconsin @ Iowa by 14
Oklahoma State @ Baylor by 24
Missouri @ Tennessee by 10
USC @ UCLA by 10
Fresno State @ Nevada by 7
Yean I can't wait for the SEC apology that basically means nothing because the shit refs that they continue to employ keep their jobs.
Are you still talking about that call specifically? Because the only part of the kicker's body that wasn't offsides was his kicking foot. The problem was they threw a flag for it immediately but didn't even state that it was a call on the field.
The actual hilarity is everyone else being mad.
But really, just to use this as a jump off point, I get it. Most of America watches Jameis thinking he's a rapist and that understandably colors perception of anything he does. Any transgression, no matter how trivial, is just further proof of what a horrible person he is. I watch with the hope that he's not a rapist, understanding that he wasn't charged (and, yes, also understanding the investigation was horribly botched) and it allows a different coloring of perception, and see the other transgressions as things that merely suggest he can be a knucklehead.
What are you supposed to do, you know? He wasn't charged, and I'd rather believe he's innocent than believe there's another rapist and another rape victim on this planet, not to mention I'd rather believe a rapist is not the quarterback of my favorite college football team. I hope I'm right, and there is at least a legal presumption of innocence here. And if he's not a rapist, then a lot of the other scrutiny he gets is unnecessary piling on.
If he did it, then I hope the victim gets justice, civilly if not criminally.
Just my 2 cents.
Holy shit I just saw the clip of Jameis shoving the ref out of the way. How does he not get ejected? Does the ref work for the Tallahassee Police Department?
yes. It should have never been called. They should have never thrown the flag for it. No one was offsides (Kickers are allowed to be offsides on kicks). If that is what you are saying sorry I got confused.
I understand why FSU fans choose to believe he's innocent.The actual hilarity is everyone else being mad.
But really, just to use this as a jump off point, I get it. Most of America watches Jameis thinking he's a rapist and that understandably colors perception of anything he does. Any transgression, no matter how trivial, is just further proof of what a horrible person he is. I watch with the hope that he's not a rapist, understanding that he wasn't charged (and, yes, also understanding the investigation was horribly botched) and it allows a different coloring of perception, and see the other transgressions as things that merely suggest he can be a knucklehead.
What are you supposed to do, you know? He wasn't charged, and I'd rather believe he's innocent than believe there's another rapist and another rape victim on this planet, not to mention I'd rather believe a rapist is not the quarterback of my favorite college football team. I hope I'm right, and there is at least a legal presumption of innocence here. And if he's not a rapist, then a lot of the other scrutiny he gets is unnecessary piling on.
If he did it, then I hope the victim gets justice, civilly if not criminally.
Just my 2 cents.
Got a text from an USC fan saying we got gifts in the first half.....
LOL!!!
When someone isn't punished within the rules of the game for doing something that is clearly illegal and which is clearly documented for everyone to see, it's hard not to see that as letting him continue to get away with being a "knucklehead" at every turn.
As a non partisan observer that INT where the guys foot was out of bounds off the uncalled offsides was kind of questionable.
That Jameis moment indeed was quite hilarious. Almost as hilarious as it's going to be when this FSU team gets taken to the woodshed when it has to play a real team.
I'll drop it, though. But I'll be as curious as anyone else about what the ACC says about the referee.
I will admit, at least due to lack of knowledge if nothing else, to wondering why nothing was done about the BB guns incident. Something was done about the crab legs. Everything since then, you know, really, it's really nothing. If a kid on your team shouts an obscene meme on campus, it's not on SportsCenter (and he isn't suspended). If a kid who's suspended dresses out for LSU, it's again not on SportsCenter. Nobody would know, nobody would care, nobody should care. (Except for maybe his parents... didn't they raise you better than to repeat a vulgar phrase?) Pushing the hearing date back, I don't know, but I think that's a move many lawyers would make for their clients (heck, I've had dates moved for far less serious matters such as traffic infractions).
Anyway, I don't know. Again, I just used that as a jump off, like I said. I generally keep my mouth shut about Jameis, certainly when people on this forum start talking about sexual assault, and I am disgusted, actually, when people use that as part of a joke. So I've got some Jameis-defense, or at least some Florida State defense, bottled up in me. (YES, at the same time, I can certainly recognize how the institution has dragged its feet, how the university police and TPD have apparently knowingly helped sweep some issues under the rug, and I would certainly prefer for that to stop.)
I'll drop it, though. But I'll be as curious as anyone else about what the ACC says about the referee.
I don't understand why his lawyers have anything to do with his student disciplinary hearing anyways. I'm sure it differs from state to state but the ones I've dealt with allow legal council but only as an advisory capacity. They don't speak for the student and they don't do any kind of asking for continuances or anything like that.
From my understanding, that's what it sounds like for Florida State, too (at least for the advisory capacity). Not being a student, alumnus, or even a resident of the state of Florida, I couldn't tell you if they're making allowances they would not for any other student. (I'd like it if they were not.)
The rivalry got to the refs too!!!
One more game to go!!!!
UCLA wins next week, Pac 12 guarantees a spot in the playoffs. And it's Troy Aikman week
It wasn't for UCLA filling the spot . Oregon has gotten our number and they are rooting for UCLA to beat StanfordUCLA would almost certainly need losses from Ohio State and Miss. State to make the playoff.
But then again, who the hell knows what the committee is going to suddenly decide to care about from week to week.
Every college I've attended has afforded its students the option to have counsel involved with disciplinary hearings. When you have a possible civil trial looming in your future it makes sense to have your attorney present to make sure you don't weaken your defense in the civil case by saying something stupid at the disciplinary hearing.I don't understand why his lawyers have anything to do with his student disciplinary hearing anyways. I'm sure it differs from state to state but the ones I've dealt with allow legal council but only as an advisory capacity. They don't speak for the student and they don't do any kind of asking for continuances or anything like that.
The thing about student disciplinary hearings is that he doesn't have to meet the criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt, it only needs to meet the preponderance of evidence which is just 51% likely that he committed the offense.
I realize that its a high profile case but damn. Title XI cases are supposed to be worked through quickly. Not like this.
**Other content coming soon**
Wow!
He's just saying that every college lets you do that.
Edit: Vegas Bowl dream still alive!
So is the Seven win Steve dream. Good weekend for Husky fans.