So daltonism is the way to go?!Seeing colours is racism
Here in Brazil until 5 years ago Negro was the norm and Preto (Black) was an insult. Now it's the opposite. LolIs negro actually used in Europe? Mad Men and other 60s movies ive seen make it sound like it was fairly acceptable to refer to Black people as Negros. Not sure if thats going to fly today.
If you think that naming a skin colour is derogatory instead of just descriptive, maybe you are the racist fuck?I think it's because of how black as a skin tone is used as a deregatory word and not just to describe someone
The point is that it's certainly viable if he is the only one.If there was more black people in there, would he still just use "the black guy"?
Yeah, let's cancel someone because he just used the most appropriate standout descriptor for someone in a group.At some point I think it's nice to see both teams respond to this kind of treatment even if the guy didn't mean to be insulting it only proves that many people are fed up with racism.
One day here and already REEing.I rather they stand agains't it even if it's by mistake than not taking a stand at all and allowing this to keep going.
Ah, the moral superior who has no argument of their own that they can substantiate with logic, evidence and reason.Those of you excusing this are pathetic.
Ah, the moral superior who has no argument of their own that they can substantiate with logic, evidence and reason.
And an inability to read the full details or reconcile basic and accepted use of standard language as exemplified in Post #33
Just accusations and judgements. Sneering derision.
Those of you excusing this are pathetic.
you refuse to accept change
you refuse to accept [...]evolution of language and social norms
Black people refer to themselves as black all the time. Calling a black person black is not an insult. It’s a descriptor. No different than “the short one”. You are a complete moron. The shell game you play with language is amazingly stupid. “Black owned businesses” “Black lives matter” both acceptable. “The black guy”? Definitely racist.The player made the right point, in a football game each shirt has a number, each team a different colored shirt and name, and when referring to a white player he didn’t say “the white guy” but with the black player he used “the black guy”.
If you can’t do the math here and would rather trip yourself over to find non sensical excuses, you are free to do it.
Also post #33 is written by someone with apparently 0 knowledge of history.
Its 2020, and if you still need someone to guide you through this then it’s because you refuse to accept change, evolution of language and social norms. And you refuse to do this out of some misguided notion that this hurts you somehow.
Listen you wanna fight for your right to differentiate football players by their skin color, go at it.
You wanna defend it by claiming it’s the end of the world if people don’t accept it? Go at it.
Fight for your right to be racist.
Black people refer to themselves as black all the time. Calling a black person black is not an insult. It’s a descriptor. No different than “the short one”. You are a complete moron. The shell game you play with language is amazingly stupid. “Black owned businesses” “Black lives matter” both acceptable. “The black guy”? Definitely racist.
You literally think describing someone as black is an insult.
Well your smugness makes you look like a self indulgent asshole. How about calling Lamar Jackson a “black quarterback”? Or Mike Tomlin a “black head coach”? Whose representation are we worried about in certain sports if not black people?It’s different from saying “the short one”, and if this is your starting point then you have nothing.
I mean clearly you’re the moron here, but that’s neither here nor there. Morons can think too, so I expect more from you.
Well your smugness makes you look like a self indulgent asshole. How about calling Lamar Jackson a “black quarterback”? Or Mike Tomlin a “black head coach”? Whose representation are we worried about in certain sports if not black people?
So it’s ok to call a person black, just not under specific circumstances, according to you? I think your lack of thinking in this topic makes it pretty obvious who the moron is.
I love the irony of your posts. You have no self awareness do you. But you hyper aggressive stance isn’t working. You can’t explain anything because you aren’t making any sense, so you’re flailing.I think it was the ref’s lack of thinking that got him in trouble. And considering you’re acting like a dumb prick about it, I would avoid situations where you’re lack of thinking might be exposed. You don’t need a bigger “moron” sign than you already have plastered over your forehead.
I love the irony of your posts. You have no self awareness do you. But you hyper aggressive stance isn’t working. You can’t explain anything because you aren’t making any sense, so you’re flailing.
What are the rules for when it’s ok to refer to a black person as black, smart guy? And make it relatively simple. You know I probably won’t be able to handle anything too complicated.
So it’s just in this specific context that calling someone black is racist? Because while I agree that a ref should use name/number, using bad form doesn’t make anyone a racist. Calling a person black is not a racist term.You’re the one who started by calling me a moron so this face turn of yours is pretty grating.
When is it ok to refer to a person as a black person? Oh I don’t know, try using the same criteria as you would with a white person. So in a football pitch try the name on the back of the shirt, the number. Go from there.
So it’s just in this specific context that calling someone black is racist? Because while I agree that a ref should use name/number, using bad form doesn’t make anyone a racist. Calling a person black is not a racist term.
Also, you are correct. I should not have called you a moron. In my defense I was half awake, but my apologies.
Dude, we are giving you all kinds of rational arguments for the sake of having a discussion, and all we get from you is some screeching and calling us racists and morons just because you decided we are.It’s different from saying “the short one”, and if this is your starting point then you have nothing.
I mean clearly you’re the moron here, but that’s neither here nor there. Morons can think too, so I expect more from you.
I think context is key, and at best you’re out of touch.
Dude, we are giving you all kinds of rational arguments for the sake of having a discussion, and all we get from you is some screeching and calling us racists and morons just because you decided we are.
You know there is a place for people like you?
ResetEra
ResetEra is the internet's premier video gaming forum destination. A savory assortment of enthusiasts, journalists, & developers. Home to breaking news and discussion about Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo, Apple, PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Switch, Google Stadia, Steam, Android, iOS, etcetera.www.resetera.com
Have fun there screeching with the other purple hairs.
..
And an inability to read the full details or reconcile basic and accepted use of standard language as exemplified in Post #33
Just accusations and judgements. Sneering derision.
...
If you can’t do the math here and would rather trip yourself over to find non sensical excuses, you are free to do it.
Also post #33 is written by someone with apparently 0 knowledge of history.
Its 2020, and if you still need someone to guide you through this then it’s because you refuse to accept change, evolution of language and social norms. And you refuse to do this out of some misguided notion that this hurts you somehow.
He’s being called a racist though. It’s not “hey after the game I’m going to go to this guy and let him know to be careful with his language.” It’s “stop the game, I won’t play if this guy is reffing”. That seems like a wild overreaction to what appears to be at worst a lack of decorum.I didn’t say the ref is a racist. I believe it was an honest slip and that it’s hard to control language in pressure situations, specially when you probably spent your life not having to worry about the usage of said word.
I do defend however that it shouldn’t be accepted and should be used as a learning experience so that in future situations it can be avoided. That’s all.
So what? What's the problem?You’re not giving good arguments for why the usage of the word in this context is ok. You’re just fighting for your right to use the word whenever you want.
I didn’t say the ref is a racist. I believe it was an honest slip and that it’s hard to control language in pressure situations, specially when you probably spent your life not having to worry about the usage of said word.
I do defend however that it shouldn’t be accepted and should be used as a learning experience so that in future situations it can be avoided. That’s all.
The player made the right point, in a football game each shirt has a number, each team a different colored shirt and name, and when referring to a white player he didn’t say “the white guy” but with the black player he used “the black guy”.
You are not even disputing our arguments.You’re not giving good arguments for why the usage of the word in this context is ok.
Yeah, I will continue to use the word "black" as a descriptor of a skin color, like every sane person does.You’re just fighting for your right to use the word whenever you want.
The context is that the only black person around was called "the black person".I was a called a moron first. And I’m not the one using out of context scenarios to justify why it’s ok in this specific context.
And if nobody ever taught you that context is everything, then now you know.
I don't mind your opinion, it's just not furthering your cause if you call people racists here without any evidence why and not engaging in sincere discussion.And if you don’t like Neogaf and how it’s a place for a wide range of opinions, you can kindly fuck off to your echo chamber of choice. I’m going nowhere.
And who are you to dictate to people what they can and can't say?
The referee wasn't referring to a player, but to a member of the staff - thus no number or names on the shirt.
You don't even know what you're talking about and you're still here complaining for the sake of it.
Seems fitting.
You are not even disputing our arguments.
Just screeching "RACISTS" around.
And who are you to dictate to people what they can and can't say?
Yeah, mate. Look at the thread.You’re the one screeching, evidently.
Yeah, mate. Look at the thread.
It's definitely me. LOL.
Shouldn't you be somewhere drinking beer and laughing with your Klan brothers for being successful in denormalizing the usage of the word "black"?Yes it is. LOL
You can say what you want, but you don’t decide how society at large decides to evolve language and terms. This has happened throughout history, as etymology is an ongoing process.
No it's not. Etymology is the study of the origin of words. Once you find the origin, it stops.
Doubling down? Nice.Origin is one part, history is another. History doesn't stop.
History does stop. That's why it's history.
Quik maffs. So proud.2+2=4
I know many italians that have no qualms on going with the hard-R option but it's not unusual to distinguish people in such a way, 'ragazzo nero' was often heard and not taken as offensive.Just a quick thought in addition to my earlier post: if the officials were speaking in a different, latinate language, their word for black might sound a lot more offensive than ours if heard out of the corner of one's ear, so to speak.
Origin is one part, history is another. History doesn't stop.
I'd like to know how this came about, I imagine it being 'Get the assistant coach off the field.' 'Which one?' 'The black one.'.
There is more than one assistant coach around and he is the only black guy with the turkish team. Why not make it easy as there is no reason for the fourth official to know the assistant coaches name.
I know many italians that have no qualms on going with the hard-R option but it's not unusual to distinguish people in such a way, 'ragazzo nero' was often heard and not taken as offensive.
Still fine as the name is not expected to be known by the fourth assistant.Assistant manager, each team only has one.