The point I'm trying to make here is that in it's proper context, the jokes may not be "hateful leaning jokes" at all, once you are able to see things like Dave's mannerisms, his tone, the delivery, things that you can't get from text about the joke, or even the words being used that the article writer might be adding to the descriptions of the jokes that weren't there in the actual set, or slang the author isn't aware of, etc...
Example, out of context, this article writer could very easily write a story that sounds hateful about a bit from Dave's former television show, Black Bush, where Dave discusses gay people and Mars and how disgusted he is at the thought of two gay men or two gay women loving each other is. Now if you never saw this bit in full and didn't understand that he was pretending to be George Bush, it would be very easy to believe that Dave Chapelle hates the LGBT community.
IF we get a video of the jokes and the article writer is proven right and they were hateful, criticize away. But I think people saying cancel the SNL stand up should wait until they hear the jokes from Dave first.