• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

"Child-proofing Harry Potter" - Mother writes about how she edited HP for her child.

Status
Not open for further replies.
http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/11/08/child-proofing-harry-potter/

The second Professor McGonagall pulls Oliver Wood from his charms class, I realize I’m in “Pinkalicious” territory again. In a flash, the entire sequence from “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone” comes back to me: Madam Hooch orders the class not to fly; Harry hops on his broomstick; McGonagall catches him and introduces him to Wood, the captain of the Gryffindor quidditch team, as its new seeker.

Accepting the consequences of one’s actions is a theme in our house, so I hastily add a line in which McGonagall gives Harry a paper to write on the importance of following instructions. Then I underscore the responsibility of being on a team, so that getting to be seeker doesn’t seem entirely like a reward for bad behavior.

I do this sort of on-the-fly editing all the time when reading to my 5-year-old. I call it “pinkwashing” after the scene in “Pinkalicious” in which the poor, discolored child must stomach horrible green vegetables as a cure for her unfortunate pinkness. She chokes down artichokes, gags on grapes and burps up brussels sprouts. The passage serves important narrative and stylistic functions, of course, but Emmett loves artichokes, grapes and brussels sprouts. He never complains about eating them, so rather than hint at a generation-long struggle against the tyranny of green veggies, I replace the negative verbs with positive ones. Pinkwashing.

“Harry Potter” presents itself for pinkwashing from almost the first page. We’ve barely arrived at 4 Privet Drive before Dumbledore informs McGonagall that Voldemort has killed Lily and James Potter and tried to kill Harry. Immediately, I have to pause to decide how much of this information to share. Dead parents are gruesome, yes, but anyone who’s anyone in children’s literature has either been orphaned or abandoned; well-adjusted kids from stable two-parent homes don’t go on hero quests.


But the attempted murder of a helpless boy not hugely younger than my son is something different. It has the tinge of nightmare, and I downgrade kill to hurt. It’s a simple solution that works in the moment, but as I read on, I realize I’ve just pinkwashed the single most important plot point of the entire series. All seven books rest on the fact that Voldemort has targeted Harry for death. Somehow, when I agreed to this read-aloud, I forgot about that.

When I think of Harry Potter, I think of Hagrid breaking down the door of a ramshackle cottage in the middle of a storm-tossed sea to inform Harry that he’s special — special beyond the wildest imaginings of the most poorly treated poor relation (magical! famous! wealthy! beloved!). I picture Harry huddled in his tiny cupboard, suffering the humiliations of his cousin, unaware that in just a few chapters he’ll be revealed as a secret prince.

It’s these images I had in mind when I gave in to Emmett’s pleadings to read the book. A fall in the park had left his forehead with a scar so big that everyone who saw it said, “Hey, Harry Potter.” Naturally, he was curious. My husband and I resisted but eventually agreed, figuring we’re ahead of our own schedule by only two years; we’d planned to introduce him to Harry at 7.

Once we started reading, we realized our math was off by a few years. Seven is still too young. It isn’t so much the minor tweaks we make to soften the language (“shut up” to “shh,” “stupid” to “silly”), or the lessons we embed to conform with the things we’re trying to teach, or even the references to death and murder. No, the problem is that Harry Potter grows up fast. The image of a kindly Hagrid towering in the doorway gives way to a terrified Charity Burbage suspended upside down and begging for her life as Voldemort kills her. The first crop of readers had 10 years between these events, but now the only constraint on the reader is his own limitations. With sufficient deftness and speed, a 7-year-old can find himself standing among the dead at Hogwarts.

And it’s this thought that makes me realize that it isn’t only Emmett who isn’t ready for Harry Potter; I’m not either. As a kindergartner, he’s just learning how to read. Right now, it’s all painstakingly sounded-out syllables and sight words, but soon it’ll be whole sentences and then paragraphs. Once he masters the skill of reading, the world will be revealed to him — the mysteries of the Cheerios box as well as the miseries of Newtown. He’ll be able to learn about Voldemort’s murderous intentions all on his own, and no amount of pinkwashing can stop it.

As soon as we finish the first book, Emmett wants to jump into the second. His pleas are as unrelenting as before, but this time we resist. Harry Potter will come, and I still look forward to the day when we’ll read it with him. My eagerness to share it with him hasn’t dimmed, only my impatience.

So for now, Harry Potter goes back on the shelf. The world will turn into a dark place soon enough, and it should. My job as his parent isn’t to shield him indefinitely from the near-universal dislike of brussels sprouts; it’s to raise a son who’ll emerge from his hero quest triumphant.

In the meantime, though, I’m going to keep the world pink for just a little while longer.

I think she should have just waited if she was concerned about key concepts of the book scaring him or being beyond his understanding. I can kind of see where she's coming from but imo she kind of underestimates kids' ability to understand or deal with death.
 

cyberheater

PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 Xbone PS4 PS4
There are millions of child friendly books she could read to her kids. Why bother censoring this book. Stupid parents.
 
What she is doing is kind of silly/stupid but you can at least appreciate that she is taking an active role in understanding and monitoring the content her child is subjected to. We need more parents like this.
 

karasu

Member
Who gives a shit what some random lady reads to her random child. Is this something we really need to judge.
 

Arkos

Nose how to spell and rede to
What she is doing is kind of silly/stupid but you can at least appreciate that she is taking an active role in understanding and monitoring the content her child is subjected to. We need more parents like this.

Yeah, could be a lot worse. I was expecting a witchcraft religious nut
 
Just choose a freaking book for younger kids then. This is worse than when my mom would let me watch violent movies but made me cover my eyes during sex scenes.
 

Kai Dracon

Writing a dinosaur space opera symphony
It sounds as if she means well but her attitude comes across as being the root of treating children like glass bulbs that will shatter if bumped against a table.

Plus some of her "edits" are intentionally subverting the intended story and characterizations to serve her own politics, like what her notions of responsibility are. Seems like it would be more productive to let the kids read the story then have a conversation about what they thought of it. Instead of feeding them a straight drip of censored information to force them to turn into what the parent imagines is ideal.
 
It sounds as if she means well but her attitude comes across as being the root of treating children like glass bulbs that will shatter if bumped against a table.

Plus some of her "edits" are intentionally subverting the intended story and characterizations to serve her own politics, like what her notions of responsibility are. Seems like it would be more productive to let the kids read the story then have a conversation about what they thought of it. Instead of feeding them a straight drip of censored information to force them to turn into what the parent imagines is ideal.

mmm, editing in Harry being punished for breaking the rules kind of ignores the whole point of the scene (Harry standing up for someone being bullied). Wonder how she's going to deal with Order of the Phoenix down the track (if she decides to read it to him)...
 

Horseticuffs

Full werewolf off the buckle
I have edited the sex out of horror movies so my kids could watch them. Specifically Halloween.

I'm part of the problem, but damn if more kids couldn't benefit from being exposed to the original Halloween.
 
V

Vilix

Unconfirmed Member
Who gives a shit what some random lady reads to her random child. Is this something we really need to judge.

Well duh. This is NeoGAF - where judging others is half the fun.
 

kazebyaka

Banned
potter233.gifc4kri.gif

I'm pretty sure you are supposed to read the book at the age of 11. Just seems logical to me. Even better, 1 book a year, so you grow with the series. Now that is an awesome
experience.
 

genjiZERO

Member
I don't really see what the big deal is. It's a bit heavy handed, but it's not that bad. In fact, I really like the whole focus on teamwork.
 
People think shielding their children from inappropiate things will make them better people when they grow older. That may work in some instances, but not entirely.

I knew a kid during middle school whose parents wouldn't let him watch The Simpsons. Fast forward to high school, and I see him smoking cigerettes and drinking.
 

Lumination

'enry 'ollins
Child wants to read Harry Potter. Parent could take the easy way out and say no. Instead, parent takes an active role in reading and monitoring what they think is best for the child. lol at the "how dare they censor the harshness of a Harry Potter reality" people.
 

patapuf

Member
Editing a book so it reflects you teachings doesn't sit right with me. Well intentioned or not, these kind of moral questions are best talked about instead isolating the kid from even thinking about any other possibility.
 

ElFly

Member
This is kind of silly but then again she is very concerned about what the kid reads, and spending a lot of quality time with the kid so it's ok.

Censoring kids to reality is NEVER a good thing, unless in certain extreme circumstances.

This is not one of them.

I can see the thread right now

"Forbes: Neogaf believes Harry Potter is real"
 

Dishwalla

Banned
Why don't we just edit the part where Bambi's mother gets shot out of Bambi? Or when Mufasa gets thrown off the cliff and is killed?
 
I'm ok with this. I bet it will be one of those fun memories of childhood, when one laughs at silly things our parents did, even more rewarding when they get to read the books themselves.
 

sky

Member
At first I scoffed at this, but then I realized - who cares?
Taking media and putting your own twist on it.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
People are going to scoff at this mother, but as a teacher, I applaud her.

She is, at the VERY least, getting involved and caring about what her child encounters, which is FAR more than I can say for the vast majority of parents today.
 

Zoe

Member
Her intentions were in the right place, but it's too easy for this to backfire. She already realized she messed up the plot. What's going to happen when her son wants to hear the story again? Is she going to remember all of her edits?
 
Child wants to read Harry Potter. Parent could take the easy way out and say no. Instead, parent takes an active role in reading and monitoring what they think is best for the child. lol at the "how dare they censor the harshness of a Harry Potter reality" people.

Yeah, at least she's taking an interest in the kinds of things her kid's exposed to. At the same time I agree with the "this is silly" sentiment; seems like it would be a lot less work to just find a book series more appropriate for a seven year old.

Like if my ten year old wanted to play GTA and I were uncomfortable with that, I wouldn't mod the game to replace guns with water guns and blood with sprinkles and ice cream. I'd just let them play another game. Kind of a weird article.
 

royalan

Member
Child wants to read Harry Potter. Parent could take the easy way out and say no. Instead, parent takes an active role in reading and monitoring what they think is best for the child. lol at the "how dare they censor the harshness of a Harry Potter reality" people.

Well, it's kind of a shitty parenting technique.

Frankly, I think editing a book to suit your own warped sense of morality and shoving it onto your kids is taking the easy way out, instead of reading the books with your children and using them as a tool to discuss the messages contained within, and how they should (or shouldn't) apply to real life.

One way actually helps your kids grow. The other is just slapping a bandaid on the problem (and lets not even get into the tidal wave of "WTF Mom!? You've been censoring books for me my entire childhood!?" this kid is going to experience when he inevitably reads Harry Potter on his own. Talk about fucked up.).
 

megamerican

Member
I feel bad for the kid. I knew kids like this and they usually came from super religious households and they had serious issues relating with the rest of us.

I really question parenting like this.
 

Ithil

Member
I have edited the sex out of horror movies so my kids could watch them. Specifically Halloween.

I'm part of the problem, but damn if more kids couldn't benefit from being exposed to the original Halloween.

Did you edit out the guy pinned to a wall by a kitchen knife too?
 

genjiZERO

Member
Well, it's kind of a shitty parenting technique.

Frankly, I think editing a book to suit your own warped sense of morality and shoving it onto your kids is taking the easy way out, instead of reading the books with your children and using them as a tool to discuss the messages contained within, and how they should (or shouldn't) apply to real life.

One way actually helps your kids grow. The other is just slapping a bandaid on the problem (and lets not even get into the tidal wave of "WTF Mom!? You've been censoring books for me my entire childhood!?" this kid is going to experience when he inevitably reads Harry Potter on his own. Talk about fucked up.).

Dude, slow down. The kid is 5. 5. Not 10. Harry Potter, as is, is likely way too much for him.
 

poppabk

Cheeks Spread for Digital Only Future
The kids five, he probably won't even remember this when he is older. Seems like a stealth brag blog - my five year old is reading at an 11 year old level.
 
I'm sure this kid will have a great time if/when the rest of his friends become familiar with Harry Potter.

"Remember when Harry Potter broke the rules and had to write "I will not break the rules" 500 times while McGonagall gave him a stern speech on the importance of teamwork? I love that part."

"...Dude, what the fuck are you talking about?"
 

royalan

Member
Dude, slow down. The kid is 5. 5. Not 10. Harry Potter, as is, is likely way too much for him.

Then maybe she should assert her authority as the adult and read something else to her child instead of crafting ridiculous lies to keep his world artificially "pink."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom