why is she doing this? I thought she hated Hilary more than Drumpf
She was probably more amendable than say, Johnson, in some back channel talks
why is she doing this? I thought she hated Hilary more than Drumpf
why is she doing this? I thought she hated Hilary more than Trump
what a complete waste and a scam. If this was such a concern, the Democrats would've filed for a recount.
My bets are this changes nothing. Though I am curious of the results nonetheless
So my question is, what happens if just one state come back with different results. What does that entail? just out of curiosity.
Either she keeps the extra cash or she wants to see if she can hit 5% nationally and get that sweet matching money. Or both.
So my question is, what happens if just one state come back with different results. What does that entail? just out of curiosity.
My bets are this changes nothing. Though I am curious of the results nonetheless
I voted trump but the denial is not real. Definitely Russia encouraged trump bc he would lift economic sanctions on Russia and Hillary wouldn't, but I doubt they hacked election results. If there was evidence, the US and Russia would go to war, and even Russia knows they would lose.
Then go start a gofundme for a charitable endeavor instead of trying to belittle those that spent their money as they wanted.It's hard to believe the amount of good that could be done in the world if the $5 million specifically donated for this had been used for literally any charitable endeavor.
Why did you change their quote?We will not go to hot war with Russia because of nuclear deterrence, although many in the U.S. would call for it. Privately, we will likely go into a cold war with them involving cyber warfare and anti-russian propaganda instead of proxy wars like the 1st Cold War.
We are free to belittle you just as you are free to spend your money however you want.Then go start a gofundme for a charitable endeavor instead of trying to belittle those that spent their money as they wanted.
Lol, with the GOP taking Congress and Senate, does anyone even want Hillary to be president? I'd much rather the GOP be the sole reason for blame and for the democrats to continue being pounded by the L so they can get their shit together. Also, what's in it for the green party? I don't understand the sudden doubts
lol you can donate to charities right now. why it has become unreasonable to criticize this foolhardy, empty gesture is beyond me. if this were in any other context it would be, quite reasonably, met with near-universal derision.Then go start a gofundme for a charitable endeavor instead of trying to belittle those that spent their money as they wanted.
We will not go to hot war with Russia because of nuclear deterrence, although many in the U.S. would call for it. Privately, we will likely go into a cold war with them involving cyber warfare and anti-russian propaganda instead of proxy wars like the 1st Cold War.
Why did you change their quote?
Why would you edit his quote? You are beyond delusional
They aren't going to find anything because they are just doing a recount. Meaning re-doing what they already did.OK - so in the unlikely event this gives Clinton a win in WI - what then? What if they find something seriously fucked up? Do the republicans block it? I almost want there to be something just for the chaos to unfold.
I didn't, that's what it was originally.
Bullshit it was.
Bullshit it was.
Not saying it's the case here, but for the sake of fairness do know this: if you edit your post within a certain range of time, the "Edited on" time stamp will NOT show, it's what gaffers often call "Stealth edit".
I'm not lying, that's how it was originally. If it was a misspoken earlier and edited, okay, but I didn't change the quote. Ask the poster to clarify because I didn't change anything.
what's your end game here? 🤔I know that, but the sentiment of the post is literally the exact opposite... Not sure how that could've been a mistake buuuuut
I guess I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. This election has more people jumping to conclusions than I've ever seen. If you're not fully on board you're almost automatically called a Trump supporter.
I know that, but the sentiment of the post is literally the exact opposite... Not sure how that could've been a mistake buuuuut
I guess I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. This election has more people jumping to conclusions than I've ever seen. If you're not fully on board you're almost automatically called a Trump supporter.
That's good I think politics is so hot button that people get angry/worked up and things go haywire... That being said I did the same thing assuming you were lying so I apologize for that. What a bizarre "mistake" to post.
If it's just $5 then I see no point in criticizing some people that want a second opinion. Or would you rather they spend that $5 to a company that uses it's earnings to profit and make peoples lives miserable all over the world or a charity that mostly will pocket it anyway?
At least this is a specific cause
I understand, everyone is a bit nervous and agitated over this election. But I can assure you that I never jumped into conclusion on calling people Trump supporters because the have a belief that's not fully on board. I have no idea if they'd vote or not, or if they are American or not. So I rarely, if ever, do such a thing.
This can be said about anything people choose to spend their money on. "Wow - you bought that $60 video game? You could have donated that to charity." "You bought Starbucks? You could've easily put that money in the Salvation Army container."It's hard to believe the amount of good that could be done in the world if the $5 million specifically donated for this had been used for literally any charitable endeavor.
what's your end game here? 🤔
I'm the opposite of a tinfoil-hat person, but e-voting needs way better security and auditing. Literally the fucking vending machine at Motel 6 does a better job.
i'm the one asking questions here; I see through your weak deflection 🕵️What's your end game on this forum?
They aren't going to find anything because they are just doing a recount. Meaning re-doing what they already did.
i'm the one asking questions here; I see through your weak deflection 🕵️
Someone told me they were going to do some verification though
Was it the same guy who saw porn on CNN?Someone told me they were going to do some verification though
The real winner all along!
Come on now, if the Democrats challenged this there'd be a huge backlash. One they laughed at elections being vulnerable to fraud and second, they'd look like super sore losers. It's one of those things that you can't win. To me the Democratic base is fickle and more likely to be swayed to note vote than a Republican and for those not joined at the hip to either party it'd be a turn off. Not to mention how conservatives would take it.It's been pointed out that there's already a lot of things the Democrats SHOULD have done by now, following the election results, but they seem content to roll over and die for the most part right now.
As a Trump supporter, I'm glad these morons are doing this. Maybe it will quiet some of these folks once the results come in and proves, once again, that Trump won the state and election.
I'd rather the money be put to use for something that actually matters, but if they wish to waste it then so be it.
Update: Hillary loses popular vote.
Was it the same guy who saw porn on CNN?
Update: Hillary loses popular vote.
it was a team of secret scientists. this team of "top men" (Top..................men) have proof of russian infiltration with assistance of the ZPE battery Podesta was referring to in his emails.
Come on now, if the Democrats challenged this there'd be a huge backlash. One they laughed at elections being vulnerable to fraud and second, they'd look like super sore losers. It's one of those things that you can't win. To me the Democratic base is fickle and more likely to be swayed to note vote than a Republican and for those not joined at the hip to either party it'd be a turn off. Not to mention how conservatives would take it.
Really, the only way I see forward for the Democratic Party would have been an unbinding investigation if such a thing were possible. If they could say they accept the original results but want to ensure future elections that'd be one thing, but potentially turning over the election, yeah that won't go well.
It's hard to believe the amount of good that could be done in the world if the $5 million specifically donated for this had been used for literally any charitable endeavor.