Of the repub options, Trump and Kasich are the two least in bed with Koch or corporate elites.
But trump making it past primaries is still very unlikely. Serious GOP voters are spread out amongst Walker, Cruz, Paul and others. As the field narrows they'll all pile into whoever stands against Trump.
Please elaborate what parts of Hillary's platform would be terrible.....
Trump is perceived to be honest just because he's an abrasive asshole. He still lies, deflects, and contradicts his earlier positions.
If it really could somehow come down to Trump vs. Sanders. I honestly think Trump would win.
Sanders is too far to the left to make a move for the general election voters.
I think this is why they are actively looking for someone to run now and push instead of Hilary. The email scandal/general unenthusiastic views has them worried.
Trump is perceived to be honest just because he's an abrasive asshole. He still lies, deflects, and contradicts his earlier positions.
Sanders is talking about what's important, and what he's saying is common sense. Trump is not addressing the real problems. In fact, Trump represents them. The wealth gap and corporate interests in our politics and the damage they are doing to our economy will resonate. Random fear issues like what Trump focuses on isn't going to motivate many voters in the middle. Sanders already has the electoral advantage on top of his platform advantage. He's also a great unscripted speaker who can go toe to toe with anyone, even Trump.
Well, that confirms it. American politics are a joke.
Question: Why would someone vote for him?
If anyone in this thread is voting for him and would like to give an answer, please, do so.
Two candidates incredibly unpopular with minorities and women who have tons of baggage that makes them the boogieman of the undecided electorate?
Yeah I would expect record lows from that throwdown.
I didn't say he was the better choice, you made that assumption alone.Then you're not trying hard enough.
Honestly, what is with these statements? Just look at the stance of both on the main issues. With Trump it's a little harder because all he does is talk about how he's going to be great without any real plans, but that alone should tell you he's not going to be a good pick.
Here's Trump on two issues:
Trump on immigration: deport all the illegals (because they're rapists and murderers), build a wall (huge waste of money) and make Mexico pay for it (lol)
Literally, if Hillary was to do NOTHING on immigration it'd be a better plan than that.
Trump on foreign policy: Iran deal should have been done in a day, China and Mexico are beating us at everything, I'd make China do whatever we want and bill Mexico for each illegal immigrant, bomb Iraqi oil fields to stop ISIS, then take the oil fields for ourselves so that "we'd have so much money."
AGAIN, if Hillary was to do absolutely fucking nothing, that would be a better strategy and keep America safer.
So, it's ridiculous for anyone to be talking about, "I can't imagine it'd be worse than Hillary." Yes, it'd be worse. Much fucking worse.
I already know based on your random jump in your going to write-off anything I say. I could be wrong but unlikely.
See, I'm not for trump but I have to ask: does not one pay attention to why he is so popular? Does anyone pay attention to the pulse of the country and why people like him?
Honest question.
When you have Hillary saying "wipe like a cloth?" in response to her being asked if she "wiped" her server - people actually wonder and are amazed Trump, regardless of his beliefs, is popular?
Its as if the only candidate not acting like a typical politician is getting all the attention.
I'm not for the guy but its really not hard to see why people are fed up with the status quo.
Just my .02 so don't kill me, GAF.
This fucking country. It's like the people here really want to burn this place to the ground.
Imagine if Trump was literally president. Jesus FUCK.
So increasing hostilities between china and russia to "make america great again" is good for the US and the rest of the world?I am always amused by this view in elections. No one should run their politics based on making other people happy. If Trump happens to be the best option for America then America should vote for him. Not avoid him cause Europe or Asia doesn't like him and thinks it would be a horrible idea...
What problem do minorities have with Bernie?
What problem do minorities have with Bernie?
David Brooks insults himself every time he sends a new column to his editor.I've loved watching David Brooks squirm. He's been shitting on Trump and refusing to treat him as a serious candidate. I look forward to Trump turning his insult cannon towards David Brooks.
I keep seeing memes on Facebook of Donald Trump standing in front of his planes, buildings, and other properties with a quote saying "We've found the one candidate that can't be bought!" I understand the hope in that.
However, when Hillary decides to launch full force when the numbers start to matter, it is going to be unlike anything we've seen before. She wanted it so bad last time that she is bringing everything she and Bill have in their artillery this time.
Bernie Sanders seems like a wonderful person to be our leader, but that will be for maybe another time. Hillary isn't letting this election (or the next one) be called for anyone else but her. I honestly have a lot of faith in her as far as leadership. Her title of "First Woman President" is so important to her that she would do anything to go down as GOAT not just a woman president, but president in general.
So I'll take that as a "no" then.
Thats old news. Bernie is meeting with BLM leaders.The BLM movement is cruising on bernie because he hasn't talked about his plans to fix race issues, hence why people have interrupted his speeches and grabbed the MIC.
You, and sometimes other people say this as if it's not the same everywhere else in big 'democracies'.
It's the same. Politicians don't win on the strength of their ideas, they win based on how they convey their ideas.
Most people don't understand the finer points of their intended policies, they just look at the person they think looks the best. Other factors such as legacy can come in, but really, it's simply a matter of riding waves.
Problem is, Hillary isn't Bill nor George Bush. She doesn't look like you'd want to be friends with her. She just looks like a severe middle-aged woman who sometimes has a crazy look in her eyes.
She'll probably win because of her name and experience and because of her sex, but it's stupid to think that American politics is crazy when it's how things are everywhere else.
The US voters vote for people like Trump. not Sanders. Sanders only has policy, Trump has personality. if voters voted on policy more than personality, we wouldn't have 2 reagan terms, we wouldnt have 2 bush terms. Even Obama was elected more on personality than policy. How easily people forget Gore, Kerry,
No, most BLM groups are very pleased with the changes in Sanders campaign after the incursions. Meeting Hillary went like that: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lIkWgTHegfoThe BLM movement is cruising on bernie because he hasn't talked about his plans to fix race issues, hence why people have interrupted his speeches and grabbed the MIC.
The BLM movement is cruising on bernie because he hasn't talked about his plans to fix race issues, hence why people have interrupted his speeches and grabbed the MIC.
Im honestly very worried when you talk about the entirety of America just how many would happily be like, "China and Russia? Fuck em! Play hardball and make America win!"So increasing hostilities between china and russia to "make america great again" is good for the US and the rest of the world?
What the fuck are u saying. Foreign relations and diplomacy is one of the key platforms that presidents run on.
Thats old news. Bernie is meeting with BLM leaders.
I'm not sure a couple of people acting on their own under the banner of a social media hashtag = minorities though.
Canada had a leaders' debate the same night as the Republican primary debate but the level of discourse couldn't be any more different. The state of democracy in the US is in much worse shape than in the rest of the First World. Japan might be just as bad, but that's not a country you want to be compared to.It totally isn't. The US and their two party system, super pacs, cheerleading brazenly partizan news networks, valourization of boasting and underlying social tensions create a political climate that is nothing like anywhere else.
Sanders is talking about what's important, and what he's saying is common sense. Trump is not addressing the real problems. In fact, Trump represents them. The wealth gap and corporate interests in our politics and the damage they are doing to our economy will resonate. Random fear issues like what Trump focuses on isn't going to motivate many voters in the middle. Sanders already has the electoral advantage on top of his platform advantage. He's also a great unscripted speaker who can go toe to toe with anyone, even Trump.
Sanders is talking about what's important, and what he's saying is common sense. Trump is not addressing the real problems. In fact, Trump represents them. The wealth gap and corporate interests in our politics and the damage they are doing to our economy will resonate. Random fear issues like what Trump focuses on isn't going to motivate many voters in the middle. Sanders already has the electoral advantage on top of his platform advantage. He's also a great unscripted speaker who can go toe to toe with anyone, even Trump.
Have you actually watched a trump speech?
Have you actually watched a trump speech?
And seriously important. He pointed out how corrupt the system is but wisely made a joke when they tried to trap him by giving a specific example.For real, he's always bringing up the money in politics things. Hell, that was one of the funniest moments in the last debate.
I thought it was impossible for a Republican to be competitive in the presidential race because of maths? Gaf told me this!
Hilary is a sinking ship and not the right person to face off against Trump.
And seriously important. He pointed out how corrupt the system is but wisely made a joke when they tried to trap him by giving a specific example.
And then it went meta when other candidates on stage asked him right there on stage for a donation.
Yes. He's the guy who used to buy the politicians... lol, how that encourages anyone I have no idea. That's not going to impress anyone with at least 2 brain cells to rub together. It's funny at first.
People losing their shit in here over something that will never happen. Read this and calm down:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/donald-trump-is-winning-the-polls-and-losing-the-nomination/
People losing their shit in here over something that will never happen. Read this and calm down:
/[/url]
Again proving my point.
Instead of asking why you make a defensive comment.
Then when I test you you do the usual sarcastic remark.
Same pattern. But I will tell you I don't prefer either to the other if that helps.