That meeting was "unfortunate"? That's quite a flippant way to describe something that resulted in a whole country being destabilized, hundreds of thousands dead (including 60,000+ innocent civilians) and you're going to refer to him as a hero? That's quite a low bar for hero isn't it?
I'm not going to tap dance on his grave here but it's silly to do the inverse and declare him a hero because he's dead now. The guy is far from a hero. If an Afghani leader or some other person from a foreign country had made the same decisions Colin Powell made, resulting in mass deaths and the destabilization of America, would you still label that person a "hero"?
First of all, he's a hero and patriot for his service to this country in the military over a lifetime, especially during Desert Storm. I was clear on this.
Also, It wasn't a meeting, it was a presentation to the UN Security Council. Again, I know given the advantages of hindsight that things went to shit and we can pin the point of divergence on the decision to invade Iraq. But at the time in 2002/2003 the entire intelligence system was onboard with what Colin Powell presented as being factual -- see the NIE's on Iraq to that point.
George Tenant, one of the few Director of Central Intelligence that served under both a democrat (Clinton) and republican (Bush) administration said the evidence for WMD was a "slam dunk". That's just a fact. To reiterate as you didn't acknowledge it, what I said was that I don't believe Colin Powell knowingly deceived us with his presentation.