The bolded is the heart of the matter--he didn't deserve to be fired. If they had a credible reason to fire him, Tech admin wouldn't have skulked around and conspired to have him fired because they were too cheap to pay him the bonus to which he was entitled. I would personally be pretty pissed if the best coach in the history of my program was fired because the administration was too cheap to live up to a modest contract.
Those leaked emails from the administration are pretty damning, and I had first-hand experience with Tech officials when OSU hired David Schmidly (for some mystifying reason). Guy was a hack who tried to run OSU like a corporation--re-naming the Athletic Director the "VP for Athletic Operations" and shit like that. Complete political type, which fits in with what Leach described in his book--too much concern about career advancement among the administration, and not enough concern for the athletic department or students.
Leach brought excitement, high rankings, high graduation rates, 60 Minutes profiles, NY Times magazine features... Frankly, it sounds like the Chancellor deserved to be told to fuck himself.
Leach complaining about too much concern about career advancement is laughable considering all the time he spent fishing for interviews at other schools during the offseason instead of recruiting while that same mostly intact administration has been advancing Tech's academic standing and funding by leaps and bounds in the intervening time.
Also, the whole "not paying him his bonus" thing was a pretty small part of the whole deal. Got much more play in the national media than it should have. If it was all just about firing him because they didn't want to give him money he wouldn't have had to wait two years to get another job. If anything, the bigger problem with the money was that every year Leach was complaining about getting a new, higher paying contract when he was never even able to win the division, much less the conference. He was already not getting results consummate with his pay and was still wanting more while doing as little as possible to raise any money himself.
Again, I'm not saying that the Administration is perfectly in the clear but Leach definitely did his fair share of the work in making the relationship irreparable. I wouldn't mind having 2000-2007 Leach back, and I probably wouldn't mind having current "out of football for two years and can only get a job at a last place team" humbled Leach, but I wouldn't want 2008-2009 Leach back. He's going to be on much better behavior at WSU than he was in his last years at Tech. That 2008 season (and in particular the UT game) pretty much tipped him over the edge in thinking that he was bigger than the University.
Magazine covers wearing eyepatches is great and all but we set season ticket and fundraising records the first year he was gone. If his 60 Minutes interviews and Donald Trump stories were worth as much to the University as people say they were then the big story about not wanting to pay him a bonus wouldn't have made any sense because it would have been offset. It's not remotely as open and shut as you think it is.
Did you not see that Monroeski said to trust him?
If you can't trust a Texas Tech fan who's rationalizing his school's administration running off an awesome football coach for no good reason, who can you trust?
Such an awesome coach that he could barely even get an interview for over a year after he was fired.
Done for now, I really don't want to keep reiterating the same stuff I've been saying for a few years now. This is why I didn't comment on the WSU game as it was going on the other night. It gets really old trying to relate first hand knowledge of the situation only to get rebuffed every time with some variation of "you're just rationalizing LOL Tech is stupid."