(BC) Marvel blaming DC, and their returnable books, for shops hurting.
Don't know the validity of this but it makes it seem like Marvel is trying to say DC doing returnable books ended up hurting the stores and Marvel is saying that is the reason they're shipping free books because shops aren't able to order as much as they'd like because of cash flow problems. Most retailers BC talked to seems to think the exact opposite.
This seems like hilarious PR attempts on Marvel's part. "Were not overshipping to boost our numbers! We're doing it to help the poor shops who are hurt by DC!!"
A new academic study shows that piracy can have a positive effect on comic book sales under some conditions. The empirical research, which zooms in on Japanese Manga comics, suggests that sales of ongoing comics dip when pirated versions are more readily available, while those for completed series go up.
This is a pretty good week for me in terms of releases.
This Hydra event sounds more and more like something Donald Trump is ghostwriting.
This Hydra event sounds more and more like something Donald Trump is ghostwriting.
I wonder if they'll reach any stretch goals. Usually most of the funding happens the first two days.
This is sad. Comics are too expensive.
Secret Empire is also giving me HOuse of M vibes.
Fake News.
I base all my comic sales data on what Messi buys.
You know what comic is expensive? Vol. 2 of Doctor Strange.
Why the fuck do I have to pay $20 for a hardcover?
No More CaptainsI wouldn't have a problem with a reality change at the end depending on what it was.
Everyone except Marvel is doing wonderfully then
No More Captains
NONot even Captain ☠☠☠☠?
Even Valiant?
Comichron talks about overshipping and "free" comics. Guess some of those other Marvel books are actually in the danger zone if you remove the free issues.
So with the 10% overship in the charts, is there any point in trying to reverse-engineer the actual sales sort of the reverse of what could be done with DC's returnable titles to find out how many copies shipped? Ultimately, I don't think it changes enough to be relevant and, in fact, it's not as straightforward in the overship case. While some seem to think all you need to do to arrive at the original "sold" number of copies is to subtract 10% from the total, that's not the right approach.
Leaving aside that to get back to a number to which 10% has been added you must subtract 9.0909%, remember that comics are whole units that can't be carved up into fractions. A 10% match on a 10-copy order is one copy, for sure but on an order of, say, 14 copies, an additional copy will only be a 7% match, while on a 19-copy order, if it isn't rounded up to two copies, an extra will only be a 5% match. It's not the case that half would be over and half would be under, cancelling out such effects, because the number of copies ordered isn't normally distributed (no pun intended). Retailers are more likely to have ordered a single copy on some books than to have ordered nine.
So a lot depends on how Marvel handled rounding but it's possible the full overship could have been either more or less than 10% depending on how things netted out.
So I'm not sure it's worth doing. What we have now, instead, is the number of books on the market, which is the figure we're usually trying to get to. There are charts on this site from many years gone by, and the transitory competitive issues from those times aren't nearly as important to today's readers as knowing how many books entered in circulation.
Everytime a hero kills someone in a different state of mind nobody cares afterwards. Wolverine must have nowadays hundreds of people from the good ones but nobody care because he was always confused or under mind control or something. The only one who is excluded from this rule is The Scarlet Witch, who is still accused of genocide, but wasnt it Quicksilver who had a unhealthy influence on her?
I was going to post this exactly but backed out.Even Valiant?
Wanda had sex with Captain America so he'll forgive anything she doesn't.This is the stuff that gets me up in the morning.
Delicious and worthwhile analysis. Essentially, overshipping pulls up the books on the bottom rung, but the top of Marvel is still pretty much set.
Cyclops is the lone exception. The X-Men were angry at Scarlet Witch, but the Avengers were ready the moment she returned.
Because Marvel don't give a fuck
I always enjoy reading these and I think there were a lot of particularly interesting nuggets this week...
-(which is nbd because it's RETURNABLE)
-Clone Conspiracy did great. Better than CWII. Silk caught the wave, but Prowler didn't.
-Gamora sounds dead, and Marvel can't be happy with Star-Lord or USAvengers
Ewing likes to write about characters and concepts that don't lend themselves to high sales. It's the same reason Tom King only sells on Bat books.Sucks about the later but Silk likely might drop once the art goes to shit. Man, why do Ewing stuff keeps getting low sales.
Beats me. We'll see what Marvel comes up with.And wasn't the complaint years ago that the same shit was stale, even Heroic Age was met with a meh.
Ewing likes to write about characters and concepts that don't lend themselves to high sales. It's the same reason Tom King only sells on Bat books.
Beats me. We'll see what Marvel comes up with.
And wasn't the complaint years ago that the same shit was stale, even Heroic Age was met with a meh.
Meanwhile...
I feel like this is how it has always been. Cyclical. People demand the "good old days" until they get them and realize books are better when you take the chains off the talent. Then we get some great books, but over time the cohesion of the universe degrades and people start missing the good old days again. Rinse, repeat.
Mighty Avengers was the only one that highly sold right?
Meanwhile...
So wrestling.
So people saying Silk art 'goes to shit', are you talking about Tana Ford's work or is there someone who takes over later in the run?
Ford, her art is one big acid trip compared to the recent CC tie ins or the one who originally did it.
So people saying Silk art 'goes to shit', are you talking about Tana Ford's work or is there someone who takes over later in the run?
Yeah. Don't like her work at all.
Stacey Lee's never coming back, is she?
Nope. Ford is the books artist.
Who's fault is this?
RIP Silk
2015 - 2015
She likely couldn't keep the schedule. She's largely a cover artist. Book will sell the same with Ford as it did with Lee I suppose. It lost me though.