whatsinaname
Member
Nope, not as far as I know.
Post #253 and on.
http://marvelmasterworksfansite.yuku.com/topic/6548/Valiant-Resurrection?page=13#.Va7Q-rNVhBd
Nope, not as far as I know.
Glue binding
in 2015
Glue binding
in 2015
Huh. I don't condone this nonsense, but it seems to be only with their classic series from the 90s. None of the reboot stuff has that.
Pretty lame to be honest.
Also, it seems to be just the X-O Manowar Classic Omnibus that has those black borders.
True, it doesn't look like a wide spread problem. I am interested in Archer & Armstrong but it will have to wait a bit. Too many other books on my to-read list.
Glue binding
in 2015
Actually no. He uses no reference material.
And a lot of artists do nude commissions but keep those under wraps and don't post them.
Cho doesn't care.
Unless you think he drew Katniss Everdeen out of memory
and just happened to draw it exactly like this photo
I'm not sure I get the whole big deal about Cho drawing a nude of a character for a commission. Besides the fact that there's nothing inherently slutty, lewd or sleazy about the nude form. Hell in art school 4 years of drawing classes and we never had a model not be nude. I'm not seeing the big deal about it.
Just finished Prison School.
I think I'm a fan after that bit whereThat was hilarious.Gackt shits himself in class.
Just wait, it gets so much better.
I'm curious, when said nude models came into the room did anyone shout "Holy wheat cakes!"?
That was actually just the second to last chapter in this collection. I'll have to wait for the next release, sadly. :/
Why did Yen Press decide to print omnibuses.
Ugh.
It was great, but I don't know if I can take more of this garbage.
Not until mid-November.
Ah well, you could always read Monster Musume in the meantime.
he definitely uses photo reference
he may not use it for comics, I wouldnt know, but he certainly uses it for realistic drawing like the Mary Jane one. Unless you think he drew Katniss Everdeen out of memory
and just happened to draw it exactly like this photo
To me thats kind of beside the point. His talent isnt in question.
The way Frank Cho does nude/nsfw/sexy commissions/sketches shows a pretty gross view of sex and women imo. The difference between his nude/nsfw/sexy commissions/sketches and that of someone like Pichelli is pretty fucking big even if the subject is the same
Another lewd book, I presume?
actually, I know full well what it is lol
Just finished Prison School.
Anyway decided to substitute Aphrodite IX for a Hellboy Library Edition Vol 1, so finally collecting that series.
Monster Musume is surprisingly lewd, but it's also cute and pretty well-written, considering the plot.
Ughh, I'm having to wait another week because of my IST order mess up with Aphrodite IX HC.
Really looking forward to reading it.
Anyway decided to substitute Aphrodite IX for a Hellboy Library Edition Vol 1, so finally collecting that series.
Also the Kabuki Library Edition is HUGE, I was expecting it to be the same size as the Fear Agent books but it's wider.
Lewdness with this prison school smut
Getting pretty lewd 'round here. It all started with Messi and his lotion.
I am a fair skinned Irish man in Florida. I burn the second the sun touches my skin.
I am taking no blame. I am a fair skinned Irish man in Florida. I burn the second the sun touches my skin. I was talking about sun lotion and aloe Vera.
I thought this was the Manga thread.
Just finished Prison School.
I think I'm a fan after that bit whereThat was hilarious.Gackt shits himself in class.
We embrace all types of comics here.
Yup. I think that Pichelli one is leagues ahead of Cho's. If you don't see the difference, well maybe how about the fact that in Pichelli's commission it's not about men? As in, the commission isn't about man's reaction to a woman's body. It's just female characters partaking in power play. Big, big difference. Cho's nude/nsfw/sexy drawings are almost always actually about man and the male gaze.Used a reference for an image for a real life person.
Really?
I like you. But... that is a stupid argument. OF course he uses a reference when drawing a real life person.
And here is a non nude one from Pichelli.
You're talking to someone who considers himself sex positive, and a fan of how Sejic and Manara draw women. My issues are with his attitudes that in turn impact the way he depicts women. If you want a longform explanation, I can try finding the time today/week to go over it. Although it would probably better serve you to read articles by women on why they think his work is problematic. Not only for their views but Cho's shitty responses.Nah, I just don't like people saying things like the way a person draws is wrong when the person is one of the few artists who can draw females with proper anatomy with none of the shitty brokeback poses.
Who also, remember, donated a huge fund to a notable charity for abuse victims.
We embrace all types of comics here.
Just finished Prison School.
I think I'm a fan after that bit whereThat was hilarious.Gackt shits himself in class.
Glue binding
in 2015
I have no idea what I'm getting into either, I'll just start with the six Hellboy books.STOP.
TEMPTING.
ME.
I ain't buying God-only-knows-how-many-volumes of BPRD.
I do, I did.Damn that blows man. CheapGraphicNovels and Midtown Comics still have Aphrodite IX in stock if you've got the cash for it still.
I have no idea what I'm getting into either, I'll just start with the six Hellboy books.
I do, I did.
Wallet am cry
I'm going all in on this shit.
I love these kinds of universes with lots of folklore and stuff mixed in...Idolmaster,
Yup. I think that Pichelli one is leagues ahead of Cho's. If you don't see the difference, well maybe how about the fact that in Pichelli's commission it's not about men? As in, the commission isn't about man's reaction to a woman's body. It's just female characters partaking in power play. Big, big difference. Cho's nude/nsfw/sexy drawings are almost always actually about man and the male gaze.
You said he doesnt use reference with no qualifier. I gave evidence strongly suggesting that he does in realistic drawings like the MJ piece. If you provided anything that says differently, I must have missed it.
also, you should probably link to the image rather than post it.
You're talking to someone who considers himself sex positive, and a fan of how Sejic and Manara draw women. My issues are with his attitudes that in turn impact the way he depicts women. If you want a longform explanation, I can try finding the time today/week to go over it. Although it would probably better serve you to read articles by women on why they think his work is problematic. Not only for their views but Cho's shitty responses.
And if you don't think Cho calling his female critics humorless and telling them to relax is problematic, then maybe you should also read feminist writing as to why that is mysogynist.
I don't think donating any amount absolves him of shitty attitudes. The same way winning an NAACP award didnt absolve Donald Sterling of shit. I can continue to call him out on his shit.
I started captain America #1 (2012)
By Remender. ...... Did I make a mistake or naw? Starting out kinda weird