My last words on this: You haven't put forth any sort of intelligent argument. It's pseudo-intelligent horseshit that boils down to "whataboutthefaces, yeah but whataboutthefaces, butthefaces.." You've dismissed the posts from Birdie and others that clearly showcase how talented and creative Quitely is--what, with distinguishing between Clark and Superman in a believable way for the first time ever in comics; or from his We3 work where time moves faster for the animals, panels slit like split-second windows while humans are demolished by these scientific prisoners seeking only to be 'gud' animals; or just from his ability to give characters an aura (Emma is cold, ruthless) and defining features (Superman is relaxed,warm like a Sun God would be if he came to our planet and accepted it as his own).
You're monomaniacal with your argument, like a proud drunk, and you're just stuck in a repetitious loop. In your own attempts at argument, you've undermined what you've said, you've posted other message board posts (from ign of all places)to try to gain some credibility, as if two dumb opinions suddenly make an argument, and you've used anecdotal evidence such as: I showed my wife and my coworkers and they said "loldeviantart fanwank". None of that amounts to a deep argument or even a semi-solid one, so stop patting yourself on the back. It just means that the people you surround yourself with are people who don't understand good storytelling and maybe they should come here and read some of Viewtiful JC's posts on it.
Frank Quitely has birthed some of the best and most important art and storytelling in the comics medium over the last 20 years. Sucks that you can't handle that.
