"It's called a mantle, not a womantle."
Your loss
Just out of curiosity...are there folks here who have actually read a good chunk of Bendis' most well-regarded work, i.e., Alias, Daredevil, Sam and Twitch, Jinx, early Powers, early Ultimate Spider-Man...and hate him anyway?
Jessica Jones and Infamous Iron DOOM both had terrific first issues and caught a lot of praise here from folks who actually read them
I like Bendis fine, but I do think he has a problem. I dropped both International and Invincible Iron Man (pre-Riri) because I felt like they went nowhere. Invincible after the second arc, and International with the first. It felt like a lot of nothing was accomplished. Like subplots being handled as main plots. There's a reason they are
subplots. His Moon Knight run also had this problem, which I've
talked about before.
I also think he has a problem of just sputtering out. His X-Men runs had that problem in spades. They were really strong for the majority of the run, then just sort of spiraled and sputtered out. And I loved those runs.
I like Bendis. I liked most of his runs in total (Alias and Daredevil) or at the very least for the majority (UXM/ANXM/Moon Knight). In the case of both his Iron Man books, I liked those for at least an arc, and I'm really enjoying Civil War 2. I think he's a solid writer, and consistently has great concepts and/or takes on characters. Without him we wouldn't have Jessica Jones, Miles Morales (who I'm cool on, but there's no doubt how progressive and popular he's been), or even modern Luke Cage. He's a good writer, he just has a problem actually going places. Either he takes too long to get there, takes too long at the end (and sputters as a result), or just goes nowhere. He can't always get it spot on, but when he does, damn is it good.
I've fallen a week behind as well. Feels bad man.
--
Captain America: Steve Rogers is interesting. I want to like it. I like where the story is going. But I think the execution is just bad. We are several issues in and it still feels like it's "setting up" as opposed to stuff actually happening. I think it's a combination of Steve's narration (which feels useless at times with how basic it is) and the over reliance on exposition to get the ball moving every chapter.
I think there's an interesting story underneath it all. I'm getting less confident that it'll be told in an interesting way though.
I think the execution is fine, I just think that CW2 has forced Spencer to spin the wheels a bit, which means a lot of set-up. Especially considering Steve's role in CW2. That said, I expect payoff soon. We're seeing his machinations bleed into other books (Sam Wilson) as well.
Ivy's power level and even her level of craftiness vary more wildly than almost any other major Bat-villain depending on who's writing her
Occasionally she is practically a goddess
She's a knight of the Green (or something like that) in the New 52.