edit: ups double post, sorry
Another thing, why does this notion exist that everyone is forced to play fox against hungrybox!?
I think that, more than puff heavily beating everyone else (she doesn't), it has more to do with the fact that fox is the only character who has relatively easy to land moves, that kill puff super early:
- unlike with other top tiers, puff can't duck under fox's grab
- up air (up throw -> up air, nair -> up air, raw up air)
- up smash (jab -> up smash, raw up smash)
Fox being able to kill puff that much easier and earlier, would probably be enough for those who dislike having to win a lot of neutral interactions to kill puff with other characters (i.e. puff slowing the pace of the game down and "not playing melee").
But then you add the fact that the other top tiers (marth, shiek, falcon,...) have very linear recoveries (also with higher landing lag), and are almost definitely f*cked each time they get hit near the corner and put off stage, unlike fox, and it makes the call even easier.
Fox is also that much better at tanking her hits, right? (getting hit at crouch cancel percent without getting knocked down). He also gets to force puff to approach him for free, thanks to lasers.
Like, if fox really deals that much better with all the traits that people dislike about puff:
- not being able to kill her with combos, edguards, or by landing a grab, like they would against pretty much everyone else
- being helpless when off stage
- puff being "lame", not being able to approach her like a regular character, having to play the "one hit at a time" game.
why would someone who can play fox, not put his time in that match up instead, if he's going to have to deal with it for years to come?
Also, isn't playing the matchup with someone other that fox, going to be more draining?
Armada said that, in Syndicate (a european tournament), trif (a peach player) went marth against him, because playing the peach dito was "too draining" to end up losing anyway, and that he would prefer to "reserve" that energy for the losers bracket.
Couldn't someone who mains marth, sheik, or falcon, but can also play fox, use a similar reasoning to justify going fox, instead of trying with his main? (aside from the fact that fox does better in the matchup)
Another thing, why does this notion exist that everyone is forced to play fox against hungrybox!?
I think that, more than puff heavily beating everyone else (she doesn't), it has more to do with the fact that fox is the only character who has relatively easy to land moves, that kill puff super early:
- unlike with other top tiers, puff can't duck under fox's grab
- up air (up throw -> up air, nair -> up air, raw up air)
- up smash (jab -> up smash, raw up smash)
Fox being able to kill puff that much easier and earlier, would probably be enough for those who dislike having to win a lot of neutral interactions to kill puff with other characters (i.e. puff slowing the pace of the game down and "not playing melee").
But then you add the fact that the other top tiers (marth, shiek, falcon,...) have very linear recoveries (also with higher landing lag), and are almost definitely f*cked each time they get hit near the corner and put off stage, unlike fox, and it makes the call even easier.
Fox is also that much better at tanking her hits, right? (getting hit at crouch cancel percent without getting knocked down). He also gets to force puff to approach him for free, thanks to lasers.
Like, if fox really deals that much better with all the traits that people dislike about puff:
- not being able to kill her with combos, edguards, or by landing a grab, like they would against pretty much everyone else
- being helpless when off stage
- puff being "lame", not being able to approach her like a regular character, having to play the "one hit at a time" game.
why would someone who can play fox, not put his time in that match up instead, if he's going to have to deal with it for years to come?
Also, isn't playing the matchup with someone other that fox, going to be more draining?
Armada said that, in Syndicate (a european tournament), trif (a peach player) went marth against him, because playing the peach dito was "too draining" to end up losing anyway, and that he would prefer to "reserve" that energy for the losers bracket.
Couldn't someone who mains marth, sheik, or falcon, but can also play fox, use a similar reasoning to justify going fox, instead of trying with his main? (aside from the fact that fox does better in the matchup)