Condoms with teeth rip apart rapists' penises!

  • Thread starter Thread starter kittens
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
150 posts and this wasnt one of them? You disappoint me GAF
225px-Teeth_poster.JPG
 
It's like no one has encountered a vagina before.
Imagine trying to put a condom on by first unrolling it and then putting it into the vagina, and then inserting your penis into the vagina.

Now imagine what you would have to do to make that scenario work - the condom would have to be attached or braced to the women at least at the end, and be rigid enough to prevent it from collapsing, yet somehow be flexible enough to be wearable when not getting raped.

As far as the spikes are concerned, they would have to apply enough pressure to pierce the skin and tissue to actually be embedded. Your only source of force is the friction against the teeth as you withdraw the penis, and that force is divided amongst all the spikes. Unless the device is attaches to the woman in some way, or the device weighs 200 pounds, you're not going to get hooks embedded into dicks.

The device simply can't work as described.
Damn you physics! We're trying to prevent rape here!

EDIT: But wait! Aren't the spikes also bladed so they would cut on insertion?
 
This is just crazy...if you're going to go and arm your nether regions why not just arm yourself with a gun.
 
150 posts and this wasnt one of them? You disappoint me GAF
225px-Teeth_poster.JPG

It has been mentioned several times.

Some people here have actually read a couple books and made reference to vagina dentata without resorting to pop culture references.

In short: read the thread. :P
 
I think the actions of murder and rape are still far apart

Normally I'd agree until the rapist cock is (deservedly) torn to shreds by the woman. Then I'm thinking all bets would be off for a lot of people not normally inclined to take rape to murder stage.
 
It has been mentioned several times.

Some people here have actually read a couple books and made reference to vagina dentata without resorting to pop culture references.

In short: read the thread. :P

i read the thread but there were no pictures. Hence i was sad.
 
It's not like they couldn't cut they guys dick with a scissor before.

I could imagine this of being a more legal way of doing it like OH GOD I FORGOT TO TAKE IT OUT SORRY!

But I also imagine someone so hung up over such a thing would have just taken the scissor alternative anyways.
 
Normally I'd agree until the rapist cock is (deservedly) torn to shreds by the woman. Then I'm thinking all bets would be off for a lot of people not normally inclined to take rape to murder stage.

Hm probably, though I could imagine that at least half of them would run home like a wounded dog.
 
That's what I'm imagining as well.

Yet the doctors that have to remove this will assume he was trying to rape her, she'll call rape. Either they believe her and the guy gets sent to jail and labeled a sex offender, or the charges get dropped, the guy still has his physical wounds, and nothing happens to the girl.

Girls that use this outside of rape should get jailtime, no parole, no questions asked. This is assault with a deadly weapon.
 
I don't think rape victims want to be murderers either.
As traumatic as rape is I think a guy bleeding to death inside you directly because of your actions is not a very nice thought either.

Why do people keep thinking this is somehow ATTACHED to the woman? It's simply inserted and then would pull out when the rapist pulls outs.

It's like no one has encountered a vagina before.
Imagine trying to put a condom on by first unrolling it and then putting it into the vagina, and then inserting your penis into the vagina.

Now imagine what you would have to do to make that scenario work - the condom would have to be attached or braced to the women at least at the end, and be rigid enough to prevent it from collapsing, yet somehow be flexible enough to be wearable when not getting raped.

As far as the spikes are concerned, they would have to apply enough pressure to pierce the skin and tissue to actually be embedded. Your only source of force is the friction against the teeth as you withdraw the penis, and that force is divided amongst all the spikes. Unless the device is attaches to the woman in some way, or the device weighs 200 pounds, you're not going to get hooks embedded into dicks.

The device simply can't work as described.

What are you on about? It would work just fine... the hooks come into play once the penis is withdrawn, not on insertion. The idea is that the penis would slip in the same direction the "teeth" are laying, but as soon as it's pulled in the other direction the teeth would sink in and then the epic struggle of rapist vs. toothy-condom would take place.
 
Why do people keep thinking this is somehow ATTACHED to the woman? It's simply inserted and then would pull out when the rapist pulls outs.

What are you on about? It would work just fine... the hooks come into play once the penis is withdrawn, not on insertion. The idea is that the penis would slip in the same direction the "teeth" are laying, but as soon as it's pulled in the other direction the teeth would sink in and then the epic struggle of rapist vs. toothy-condom would take place.

And upon insertion the device would collapse - you would not be able to insert you penis into it. The device is not rigid, the device is not affixed to the woman. You may as well jump into a pair of tube socks or throw a pillow into a pillow case.

EVEN IF you intentionally put it on, you would have to HOLD the device still when withdrawing for it to become embedded, otherwise it would just slip out of the vagina along with the penis, and never dig into it.
The friction between a vagina and a (regular) condom is less than the friction between a condom and a penis. This is why condoms don't slip off your dick and lay in the vagina with every thrust. This is why female condoms are so cumbersome and require retention rings.
The same holds true here - unless you're a canine with a knot at the base of your dick, it is easy to withdraw from a vagina. The sole source of force between the condom and the penis will be imparted by the friction between the vagina and the condom. That force, divided by the total area of contact of the spikes, will yield the pressure each spike would apply. Unless the device is attached to the woman, that pressure will not result in hooks embedding into your tissue. At most you'd get uncomfortable poking or some scratches to the skin.
 
Mudkips, ever heard of tampons?

If so, ever heard of plastic applicators?

Yes. And how do they work?
A smooth satiny finish on the outside to reduce friction against the vagina, and a dry, textured inside to reduce friction with the tampon.

The Rape-Ex, No-Rape, Rape-Axe, can not work as described. It's simple physics.

Mudkips
Failed Biology
(Today, 03:55 PM)

...and other classes, I guess.

Aced every class.
 
Yes. And how do they work?
A smooth satiny finish on the outside to reduce friction against the vagina, and a dry, textured inside to reduce friction with the tampon.

The Rape-Ex, No-Rape, Rape-Axe, can not work as described. It's simple physics.



Aced every class.

I would draw a diagram on how you're wrong. However, I'm at work, so I'm not going to start drawing a penis going into one of these teeth condoms.
 
It's like no one has encountered a vagina before.
Imagine trying to put a condom on by first unrolling it and then putting it into the vagina, and then inserting your penis into the vagina.

Now imagine what you would have to do to make that scenario work - the condom would have to be attached or braced to the women at least at the end, and be rigid enough to prevent it from collapsing, yet somehow be flexible enough to be wearable when not getting raped.

As far as the spikes are concerned, they would have to apply enough pressure to pierce the skin and tissue to actually be embedded. Your only source of force is the friction against the teeth as you withdraw the penis, and that force is divided amongst all the spikes. Unless the device is attaches to the woman in some way, or the device weighs 200 pounds, you're not going to get hooks embedded into dicks.

The device simply can't work as described.

Female condoms aren't rigid and I've never had a problem keeping one in place in my vagina. Think of it as a Chinese fingertrap or the opening of Clorox kitchen wipes. You stick your finger down there to grab a wipe. Your finger goes down smoothly but once you grabbed onto a wipe and pull your finger out it's HOLY FUCKING SHIT time.

*edit* I see Count Dookkake already brought up the fingertraps. Listen to this man.
 
Female condoms aren't rigid and I've never had a problem keeping one in place in my vagina. Think of it as a Chinese fingertrap or the opening of Clorox kitchen wipes. You stick your finger down there to grab a wipe. Your finger goes down smoothly but once you grabbed onto a wipe and pull your finger out it's HOLY FUCKING SHIT time.

*edit* I see Count Dookkake already brought up the fingertraps. Listen to this man.

You're not getting what he's saying. I don't think I can really word any differently, but unless the tooth condom thing was rigid, there's no way a dick is just going to slide all the way into it without manual assistance.
 
There are worse things that can happen.. If she actually bothers to have some goodbye sex i would think you have a nice gf.

.. At least she is putting in some effort
and then she accuses you of 'rape' and you have a shredded dick as 'proof'.
 
They should add poison or an intense pain killer on the teeth. The poison could kill, and the pain killer would numb the penis so they don't feel the pain.
 
I don't get how it has to be removed by a doctor...
Once the member goes flaccid, wouldn't that facilitate the removal?

Or would that actually make it worse?
 
I don't get how it has to be removed by a doctor...
Once the member goes flaccid, wouldn't that facilitate the removal?

Or would that actually make it worse?
Inward-facing barbs that stuck far enough into the flesh would be difficult for the average person to remove without causing lots of additional tissue damage.
 
I don't get how it has to be removed by a doctor...
Once the member goes flaccid, wouldn't that facilitate the removal?

Or would that actually make it worse?

It's bullshit.

Like this products entire existence.

EDIT: You can see inside what the barbs look like, they're just curved edges.
 
I typed out a whole thing explaining how it works, and then I started doing a diagram.

Then I realized what the fuck I was doing, wtf?
 
Seems there is a lot of concerned dicks in here.

Rule of thumb is to, sniff it, taste it, and then fingers. Don't just go and put your penis in first all willy nilly.
 
Hm probably, though I could imagine that at least half of them would run home like a wounded dog.
That's the happy go lucky movie plot scenario. Presumably some Benny Hill music plays while he runs back and forth in front of the camera in fast motion with the Wilhelm scream.

The reality is that the man is going to murder her in the most painful possible way. Probably by digging his thumbs into her eye sockets.
 
Has anyone mentioned that if your a rapist an got your dick stuck in this thing that you'd probably murder the girl as cut her vagina off to escape? :/

This doesn't sound like such a good idea.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom