• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Court: Baker who refused to make gay wedding cake can't cite beliefs

Status
Not open for further replies.

Alavard

Member
This is exactly how I feel.


Yes. I'm also okay with businesses refusing to serve whites if they so desire. It's their business, they should be able to pick and choose who they serve.

And what happens when in a small town the only two grocery stores in town refuse to serve black people?
 

LosDaddie

Banned
When I made my initial thought on it I wasn't thinking of the bigger implications of it that lead back to stuff like the civil rights issues and the "whites only" stuff. I feel like a piece of shit now for my initial view on it.

Well, in theory, that view would work out just fine. But reality has shown differently.
 

Alucrid

Banned
I'm a little conflicted in this. He isn't saying he won't serve gay customers only that he doesn't want to make gay themed cakes. You could say that he's holding himself out to the public, but isn't there a line? Does this mean he would have to make a cake for a hate group too? Now, we can draw a line of reasonableness, but it's still an arbitrary line.
No he doesn't want to make cakes for same sex weddings.
 

Siegcram

Member
No politician has ever said anything dumb outside of the US. Good point.

hint: they're probably not gonna win
That wasn't the point. The point was that your right gets their talking points from the Middle Ages. Not really mindblowing then that people think of your country as backwards.
 

braves01

Banned
As long as the bakery isn't forced to write frosting phrases in support of gay marriage, like "Happy gay wedding Mike and Bob," I think this is okay.
 

NeonBlack

Member
Does he also check to make sure the couples are virgins or made sure neither was divorced in the first place?

That rainbow cake looks delicious
 
Link.

tumblr_inline_mi7ni0hv6y1qkf6iw.jpg




Heh.

"I have no problem with you in my store but get out of my store."


Here's a well respected panel of Christians talking about the subject
Should a Christian bake a cake for a gay wedding?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2zojfydk2c

You will probably be surprised of what they have to say.
 
I don't get why this guy couldn't just make the damn cake. His ego might have been hurt a little but he wouldn't be facing all this drama and potential fines. The bible doesn't even mention not being able to provide a service to gay couples.
 

Jayof9s

Member
When I made my initial thought on it I wasn't thinking of the bigger implications of it that lead back to stuff like the civil rights issues and the "whites only" stuff. I feel like a piece of shit now for my initial view on it.

We all have said things we didn't fully think through, it happens. Not everyone is willing to admit they made a mistake though, so good on you.
 

Harpuia

Member
Yeah, they have the right to refuse. Likewise, people have the right to not buy, sue them, and run them into the ground. It's their business, and they can run it however they like. That doesn't fly anymore though, and will lead them to financial ruin. Why would anyone actively prevent certain people from buying from their store? Economically it makes no sense! You're losing money, and time if it gets taken to court like in this situation.

You can be as big a bigot as you want, but don't be surprised when everyone rightfully starts calling you an asshole.

is the cake in the pic a real cake? I want to eat it


It's looking kind of dry though...can't stand dry cake...
 

NeonBlack

Member
I don't get why this guy couldn't just make the damn cake. His ego might have been hurt a little but he wouldn't be facing all this drama and potential fines. The bible doesn't even mention not being able to provide a service to gay couples.

He also gets free promotion as well. When chick-fil-a came out with their stance against gay people the lines were around the block.

When I made my initial thought on it I wasn't thinking of the bigger implications of it that lead back to stuff like the civil rights issues and the "whites only" stuff. I feel like a piece of shit now for my initial view on it.

It's okay you understand where you went wrong. I'm guessing you were thinking more on the lines of no shirt, no shoes, no service.
 

Laieon

Member
And what happens when in a small town the only two grocery stores in town refuse to serve black people?

There's plenty of towns where the majority of people living in them are black. If they ban black people, then they'll probably lose money.

I do think it's a bit odd that GAF seems to have this notion that every single small town is just filled with a bunch of racist whites. I'm sure the vast majority of grocery stores in small towns would be more than happy to serve all different kinds of people. I say this as someone who's from a town with a population of under 10,000. I also say this as someone who lives in a place where you do occasionally run into places that will refuse to serve you ("No Foreigners Allowed"). I don't bitch and moan about it, I walk 20 feet to the place that does want me there.
 

RDreamer

Member
Guys, think of that poor baker. He's obviously scared his god will make him burn in hell for all eternity if he bakes a cake for a gay wedding.
 
I can't help but laugh at the concept some people have of business being somehow independent of government interference or something.

Huge parts of how every business works are regulated by the government on federal, state, county, and depending on where you are, city/town levels as well. You basically can't even run a business without signing papers and paying taxes and all these other things that are specifically reliant on laws and regulations.

It's totally baffling to me that people seemingly forget all this in the face of "I should be able to do what I want" arguments about business. You can't "do what you want", and never have been able to!
 

BamfMeat

Member
This is the type of bullshit I'm tired of seeing on here. Are you American? If so, do you leave your house? Maybe in the backwoods of the deep south would a "No Blacks" sign work. "No Gay Wedding Cakes", ok I'll give you that would garner more support.

I swear this forum wants to act like America is 400 years behind the rest of the world.

I am American, I leave my house frequently. I'm not sure how you can say that and say you're American.

When we have places where a black population is a minority of the town, but the majority of the towns arrests are black people, I fail to see how the logic wouldn't follow that if a business could discriminate against black people, they wouldn't.

Also, yes, we ARE about 400 years behind the rest of the known first world, in both our policies and our way of thinking.

We all have said things we didn't fully think through, it happens. Not everyone is willing to admit they made a mistake though, so good on you.

This is seriously the truth.

There's plenty of towns where the majority of people living in them are black. If they ban black people, then they'll probably lose money.

I do think it's a bit odd that GAF seems to have this notion that every single small town is just filled with a bunch of racist whites. I'm sure the vast majority of grocery stores in small towns would be more than happy to serve all different kinds of people. I say this as someone who's from a town with a population of under 10,000. I also say this as someone who lives in a place where you do occasionally run into places that will refuse to serve you ("No Foreigners Allowed"). I don't bitch and moan about it, I walk 20 feet to the place that does want me there.

Probably because quite a few of us came from small towns in the first place and we know what it's like there.
 
There's plenty of towns where the majority of people living in them are black. If they ban black people, then they'll probably lose money.

I do think it's a bit odd that GAF seems to have this notion that every single small town is just filled with a bunch of racist whites. I'm sure the vast majority of grocery stores in small towns would be more than happy to serve all different kinds of people.

Because this has happened in the past

A racist grocery store owner doesn't care if he loses money not serving african americans. He doesn't serve them due to deep rooted hatred, even if he loses money. Even if he goes out of business, racism is so embedded into his mind that allowing black people to increase business wouldn't even enter his mind as an option.

We know this is how it happens because it has happened, even in the life times of people who are still alive.

That's why the "if they lose money they'll change" stuff doesn't work. You're applying rational methods to business to irrational people.
 

Laieon

Member
Because this has happened in the past

A racist grocery store owner doesn't care if he loses money not serving african americans. He doesn't serve them due to deep rooted hatred, even if he loses money. Even if he goes out of business, racism is so embedded into his mind that allowing black people to increase business wouldn't even enter his mind as an option.

We know this is how it happens because it has happened, even in the life times of people who are still much alive.

That's why the "if they lose money they'll change" stuff doesn't work. You're applying rational methods to business to irrational people.

If he eventually goes out of business or loses money, what's the problem then? He loses either way, society has spoken.
 

RDreamer

Member
I think nowadays even in pretty small towns you'd have a hard time outwardly saying you won't serve black people. There are probably a few towns where that might work, but overall probably not. It would be a nonstarter for the most part.

The thing is, though, that's decades after forced integration. We're literally in the same year of allowing same sex marriage across the country. Businesses absolutely would survive right now if they didn't allow same sex couples or doing business for same sex weddings.
 
This businesses will lose money crap has been proven wrong just by the amount of gofundme money these bigots have received. There are millions of people that support exactly what they are doing

You have to be completely naive to think that being anti gay people these days is devastating outside of government action.
 

Armaros

Member
If he eventually goes out of business or loses money, what's the problem then? He loses either way, society has spoken.

Considering those anti-gay businesses that crowd support hundreds of thousands of dollars from other anti-gay supporters?
 

NeonBlack

Member
See, I agree that outing oneself like this would be a great way to let the public destroy your business..but something tells me a "No Blacks" sign somewhere in the U.S would actually improve business and work. Same for a "No Gay Wedding Cakes"

I disagree, there may still be racism against black people but no one wants to seen as a racist even if they are.They would stay away from the shop out of pure fear of the label being placed on them.
Right now we don't have that for the gay community. They are hiding behind there religious beliefs in order to discriminate against someone different then them.
 
If he eventually goes out of business or loses money, what's the problem then? He loses either way, society has spoken.

That doesn't mean another business will prop up that fills the role his did. If he's the last grocery store for miles, there's no guarantee another will step up and fill the same niche, and even if one did open, there's no guarantee it wouldn't be segregated either.

And what if he doesn't go out of business. What if not serving minorities actually gains him business.

You're basically denying that the history of discrimination from the early to mid 1900s never happened.
 

Harpuia

Member
This is exactly how I feel.



Yes. I'm also okay with businesses refusing to serve whites if they so desire. It's their business, they should be able to pick and choose who they serve. There's obviously plenty of other alternatives.

I'd rather the business owners put their beliefs out in the open for the simple reason being that I'd rather support and give money to a business that shares the same world view that I do.

Doing so condones segregation. Is that really something people should reward by supporting stores that express beliefs such as discrimination? I'd venture to say that people doing so impacts poorly upon a society and on a smaller scale, the community.
 
I don't understand how it's not really a case of sexual discrimination. If you're willing to bake a cake for a woman who is marrying a man, but you won't bake a cake for a man who is marrying a man, then you're discriminating on the basis of his gender.
 

Siegcram

Member
Considering those anti-gay businesses that crowd support hundreds of thousands of dollars from other anti-gay supporters?
Kickstarter wasn't a thing back in Adam Smith's times so it obviously doesn't count as the free market. Because a free market fixes everything and is perfect in every way.
 

Jhriad

Member
Phillips has maintained that he has no problem serving gay people at his store but says that making a wedding cake for a same-sex wedding would violate his Christian beliefs.

"I have no problem serving you if I don't have an easy way to tell if you're gay but if I know you're gay then I've got a problem with serving you." That's really what that's saying.
 

Laieon

Member
Considering those anti-gay businesses that crowd support hundreds of thousands of dollars from other anti-gay supporters?

I don't really have an issue with stupid people giving money to stupid people either. I believe people should be able to do with their money what they choose.
 
now i hope you don't confuse why black people did sit ins and boycotted places , it wasn't because of refusing to be served. It was for receiving second class service for the same price. Jim Crow shop owners were just fine having pick ups for black people in alley ways, or having a negro section in a shop. It wasn't about black people being allowed it was about taking the money and treating them like shit in return. This isn't the same thing, here we have someone saying they don't want to be a part of something that goes against their beliefs ie the wedding, he's not taking their money or refusing to refund (is he? that would be a lawsuit).

There are similarities but the difference is there, just as many boycotts of establishments happened as did , sit - ins to prove a point. Boycotts of bus systems, retail chains, etc etc , however in the mean time black people had their own businesses , and people to patronize. The issue was businesses expecting full PRICE for jim crow service. Things changed because businesses saw people voting with their wallets, if such and such a chain isn't going to accomodate black people then spread the word and give your money to someone who would.

It's a little disturbing to see that aspect of it being glazed over thats huge.

Any and all discrimination is fucked.
 

Armaros

Member
I don't really have an issue with stupid people giving money to stupid people either. I believe people should be able to do with their money what they choose.

That directly goes against your belief that the free market will run the discriminating businesses out of business.


KEY HINT, THEIR SUPPORTS WILL KEEP THEM IN BUSINESS, JUST LIKE DURING SEGREGATION
 

Siegcram

Member
I don't really have an issue with stupid people giving money to stupid people either. I believe people should be able to do with their money what they choose.
You can believe that, but stop proclaiming that the result would be anything other than utter shit. Laissez-faire doesn't incentivize social change and sure as shit doesn't fix anything.

You get equality or a free market. Not both.
 

Future

Member
If he eventually goes out of business or loses money, what's the problem then? He loses either way, society has spoken.

Society is speaking right now dude. By not allowing the business to discriminate

If his religious beliefs are so important, he shouldn't be running a business that will make him serve people he doesn't want to. A wide assortment of jobs are available that would better fit his rigid belief system that society has rejected
 

Log4Girlz

Member
If he eventually goes out of business or loses money, what's the problem then? He loses either way, society has spoken.

White people own a disproportionate number of businesses. You'd only be hurting fellow citizens for no reason. This didn't work the first time.
 
Whats the legality of refusing to do a cake design that is viewed as obscene?

Obviously arguing that having two dudes on a cake be "obscene" is stupid as fuck, but can't an owner deny designs that are say ISIS flags, KKK flags and so on?

Not that it matters, this guy wasn't the arguing the design as far as I can tell, he simply didn't want to make a fucking cake for a gay wedding, which I would view as denial of service.
 

Kimawolf

Member
So now he'll just get a donation drive going and make like a million dollars or more to support his family.

I think as a public business you should be forced to make the cake, but he shouldn't have to write his support of gay marriage. We can't force people to say or believe in something they don't.

And yes courts need to get involved because normal people are surprisingly racist and bigoted.
 

CDX

Member
I'm a little conflicted in this. He isn't saying he won't serve gay customers only that he doesn't want to make gay themed cakes. You could say that he's holding himself out to the public, but isn't there a line? Does this mean he would have to make a cake for a hate group too? Now, we can draw a line of reasonableness, but it's still an arbitrary line.
No. ...well maybe, BUT only if he's in the business of selling hate cakes, but he's not.

There is no practical reason a "gay wedding cake" should be considered a separate product category. It's just a "wedding cake" that happens to be ordered by a gay couple

If a straight heterosexual couple comes in and asks for a "wedding cake" and you sell them one, but refuse when a gay couple comes in and asks for the same service a "wedding cake" to be made. That's discrimination.

If somebody comes in and asks for a hate cake and you don't sell hate cakes to anyone. That's not discrimination when they get denied
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom