And yet you tremble in fear of vaccine side effects several orders of magnitude lower.
Reading the Youtube comments, it's fascinating how a lot of people see the exact same clip and have the opposite interpretation. It's wild.Dr. Rhonda Patrick is such a chad, Rogan tried really hard to derail her train of though yet she did her best to answer and come back to what she was explaining.
Must be awkward, she's been several times in the podcast and this time Rogan is confronted with someone he considers an expert in this kind of think, who he trusts, challenging his believes.
That when vaccines get less effective and you are fully vaccinated, you are not , overtime .. does that make sense?
Dr. Rhonda Patrick is such a chad, Rogan tried really hard to derail her train of though yet she did her best to answer and come back to what she was explaining.
Must be awkward, she's been several times in the podcast and this time Rogan is confronted with someone he considers an expert in this kind of thing, who he trusts, challenging his believes.
I thought she was fine. What specifically did she do that you think was not a good look?
I'm lost for words.
That number is 10% of your total hospital capacity being taken by covid patients per day. If the average covid patient needs to stay for 10 days that's every single bed taken and everyone else who needs chemo, has an accident or gets shot is left out in the parking lot.
What battle? who am i trying to convince of what exactly?
www.jpost.com
Sorry to hear about your situation. When we got it (before the vaccine was available) I had a couple nights where I felt so bad I thought “well, this is how I die I guess.” People talking about the death count don’t realize how shitty this thing makes you feel or completely overlook the potential for long haul symptoms. Getting COVID is no walk in the park, it sucks. Take care of yourself, Tylenol and NSAIDs helped my body aches at least. The chills and cold sweats never went away for days though
You have my sympathy, genuinely. I want to tell you things will get better, but everyone's experience with COVID is different, obviously, but just keep on fighting the good fight. I hope things improve for you and all your family.
Sorry to hear, hope you get better soon! Your Superman analogy, probably right .. sadly that is how most people are , they just can’t know how it is , if they don’t have it .. also is with other things !
The ideal of zero covid is great and all, but maybe unrealistic with delta. And with vaccinines to mitigate impacts there could be a better balance. They'll eventually have to get used to rising case numbers. They need to know vaccinated people can still get covid they just fight it better. Those rising numbers as things open sound like they are going to scare the fuck out of them. And get used to rising ICU and deaths. Even with 100% vaccinated opening there's no such thing as zero covid.
You’re just a walking talking manifestation of what it means to be stupid.
I posted why my link as to why i thought normally several years for FDA approval. That fast track breakthrough therapy is awfully suspicious but whatever.See:
www.reddit.com/r/HermanCainAward
The schadenfreude there is over the top and cruel IMO, but there are several posters in this thread over the past two weeks who sound precisely like the numerous award winners referenced in that subreddit.
I understand you're not from the US, but the clinical trials nor full FDA approval take years. The Pfizer vaccine has been being distributed since December 2020 after they obtained E.U.A.. To get E.U.A. the FDA needs a minimum of two months of phase three clinical trials looking at safety and efficacy. For full approval of fast tracked drugs they require at least six months of data, not only looking at safety and efficacy but also a deeper dive into their manufacturing process, standards of inspection, purity, and consistency.
Frankly anyone saying this is a "rubber stamp" or that FDA approval was rushed either do not understand the process (by either rank ignorance, or more likely these days, because they were misinformed by Facebook / YouTube / Etc), are staunch anti-vaxxers that wouldn't have accepted it even if it took another year, or both.
Since you're also believing Ivermectin does anything and is woefully incorrect on the testing and approval process and known dates, I am guessing you've been consulting doctor Facebook.
Step by step:
Drug Development & Approval Process
Get to know FDA’s drug development and approval process -- ensuring that drugs work and that the benefits outweigh their known risks.www.fda.gov
The FDA's Drug Review Process: Ensuring Drugs Are Safe and Effective
The FDA's Drug Review Process: Ensuring Drugs Are Safe and Effective
Fast Track, Breakthrough Therapy, Accelerated Approval, Priority Revie
Speeding the availability of drugs that treat serious diseases are in everyone's interest, especially when the drugs are the first available treatment or if the drug has advantages over existing treatments. The Food and Drug Administration has developed four distinct and successful approaches to...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
nice scientific rebuttal. I mean its a fact that India vaccination rate is extremely low. It doesn't have to be antivaxx vs vaccinated. There is still the need for treatment because everyone is going to get covid, vaccinated or not.
Well that's great news. Israeli studies were some of the most critical of waning vaccine effectiveness, reporting it at 39% after 8 months. If they think it's back up to 95% then that's a huge win for mankind.COVID: 3rd vaccine 95% effective against infection, 97% against serious
*Almost 10,000 cases for 2nd day in a row, serious patients plateau *Finance Minister Avigdor Liberman: Stop talking about 4th lockdown and let economy work
Promising news out of Israel, but it remains to be seen how accurate it is. If it holds, it also remains to be seen if the immunity lasts against the delta variant or if it will wane again after 6-8 months.
Then let the medical community approve it as an official treatment then and prescribe it as needed.I posted why my link as to why i thought normally several years for FDA approval. That fast track breakthrough therapy is awfully suspicious but whatever.
As for ivermectin. I have posted larger scale studies on it that shows it works. Up to 70-85% reduction in infections as a prophylaxis. And reduction in duration when infected by 2 days.
Indian study
South African Study
COVID-19: The Ivermectin African Enigma - PubMed
The incidence in mortality rates and number of cases is significantly lower among the APOC countries compared to non-APOC countries. That a mass public health preventive campaign against COVID-19 may have taken place, inadvertently, in some African countries with massive community ivermectin use...
Worldwide but mostly South Africa
A COVID-19 prophylaxis? Lower incidence associated with prophylactic administration of ivermectin - PubMed
As COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) continues to rapidly spread throughout the world, the incidence varies greatly among different countries. These differences raise the question whether nations with a lower incidence share any medical commonalities that could be used not only to explain that...
How is it suspicious? Why wouldn't we do everything in our power to expedite the process? They saved time by holding the trials simultaneously instead of sequentially, for example.
Why do you put so much confidence in these studies and not in the vaccine studies? The latter have much more supporting evidence than the former.
She said “I don’t know” to almost every question. That’s not a good look when you start off a clip claiming to be a medical authority present to dispel myths. She should’ve begun the conversation in a much more open way. I think she’s a brilliant woman, but this was a terrible appearance. YouTube comments, tribal and toxic as they can be, often reflect the general reception of a piece of media. In this instance they’re correct.
What's wrong with "I don't know" as an answer? There's still a lot of things we really don't know. She has a high threshold of evidence for her statements, and "I don't know" is a much more honest answer than someone claiming they do know based on flimsy data.
Scientists have told people to stop self prescribing it like a bunch of fucking idiots.
I just explained what’s wrong with that response and the optics in the forum in which is was presented. A show of that reach with such an incendiary topic is not the occasion to waffle. You don’t need to believe me, but the response speaks for itself.
I never said i didnt have confidence in the vaccine studies. I know vaccines work. My issues with vaccines is long term toxicity effects from the vaccine in your body, that we cannot know until several years from now. IE i dont know if these vaccines in particular are safe long term. Other vaccines, I have no issue taking.
Coming soon to America
And I just responded to you with an explanation that puts her answer into context and explains its value not in terms of optics but in terms of facts.
What is with you? I’m not disputing her facts, I’m discussing the optics and delivery of what she said, which clearly went over as well as a lead balloon. If you can’t have a civil discourse don’t bother trying to engage with me, thanks.
What was uncivil about my response? I didn't insult you. I responded to your comment normally.
