Malakhov
Banned
Most likely not, no.Good thing nobody in this situation is getting cancer put in them.
Most likely not, no.Good thing nobody in this situation is getting cancer put in them.
Definitely not*Most likely not, no.
Would like a side of that future knowledge please.Definitely not*
Would like a side of that future knowledge please.
Wish astra had your knowledge before releasing theirs
Uh huhWish astra had your knowledge before releasing theirs
hur hurUh huh![]()
You can compare UK without a pass - 35 000 cases per day with that of France, where the pass was rolled out 2 months ago - less than 5 000 cases. What’s even better is that going back to school after the summer didn’t change the trend.
Covid Tyranny:
Whelp, my friend’s uncle died. 3 days after getting a pfizer booster. They said it was pneumonia related, so who really knows. Was a healthy guy though
Oh boy....
Nothing new, and nothing really worrying. This is the efficacy against infection, but for this type of virus, sterilizing immunity is nigh impossible and immunity against infection can hardly last more than a few months up to maybe a year; however, the efficacy against severe cases and hospitalizations remains very high throughout the entire duration of the study (close to 90%), and in the end, it's what matters the most. The viral load should also decline much faster with vaccinated people, hence limiting the propagation of the virus (but not stopping it).
We will never reach herd immunity, that's just not realistic; but as the virus becomes endemic, like the other human coronaviruses, we will a good amount of T-cells to prevent us from spitting chunks of our lungs at every infection. Basically, vaccines are gonna turn COVID into another common cold. And each breakthrough infection, while being much milder than a first infection, will also act as a booster shot prolonging the personnal protection. Also, for reference, people contaminated with SARS-cov1 in 2003 still had T-cells in 2020...
I personnally don't believe that booster shots for people below 60 and/or not immunocompromised are really necessary, though I'd take one if offered (no reason not to).
What made COVID so dangerous, and so deadly, was first and foremost that it was a completely new disease for our immune systems, normally, we're supposed to build immunity for all this stuff during childhood while our immune system functions differently. A bit like native americans being decimated by the new diseases brought by the Europeans. Vaccines help our immune system being less naive towards COVID, but I don't believe that aiming for zero COVID worldwide is a sound strategy.
who really knows
Pneumonia is totally not a possible side effect from the vaccine, so likely he wasn't as healthy as you believed. But getting a vaccine while you're already very sick could be hard on the body.Whelp, my friend’s uncle died. 3 days after getting a pfizer booster. They said it was pneumonia related, so who really knows. Was a healthy guy though
Yeah I know about walking pneumonia. Someone can appear entirely healthy, but have it. And you’re right, that could have happened tooPneumonia is totally not a possible side effect from the vaccine, so likely he wasn't as healthy as you believed. But getting a vaccine while you're already very sick could be hard on the body.
Oh boy....
Yeah, the long game is probably annual shots, either mRNA or protein subunit, that will cover both flu and any current covid variants.This has been know for a while now? It just means there will likely be some kind of Flu Shot like system put in place.
Yeah, the long game is probably annual shots, either mRNA or protein subunit, that will cover both flu and any current covid variants.
Flu has already dropped off like crazy because of masks and distancing.Frankly, I’m much more likely to bother to get my flu shot now, if I’m getting my Covid one as well. I guess a lot of people will probably be like me, and we might see a drop in flu cases as well.
I still think that this will not end up being an annual shot, maybe one or two boosters. We still haven't seen variants showing significant immune escape while retaining infectiousness.Yeah, the long game is probably annual shots, either mRNA or protein subunit, that will cover both flu and any current covid variants.
The threat of variants is overrated but I think we will need annual boosters simply because the immunity fades over time regardless.I still think that this will not end up being an annual shot, maybe one or two boosters. We still haven't seen variants showing significant immune escape while retaining infectiousness.
I still think that this will not end up being an annual shot, maybe one or two boosters. We still haven't seen variants showing significant immune escape while retaining infectiousness.
They say pneumonia related which means it's not directly by pneumonia. It could have being plenty of things. But often such a sudden death (in an healthy person) is caused by blood clots. A pulmonary embolism can be related to pneumonia.Pneumonia is totally not a possible side effect from the vaccine, so likely he wasn't as healthy as you believed. But getting a vaccine while you're already very sick could be hard on the body.
You know what also causes blood clots?
It didn't have C19 otherwise they would have happily declared it the cause of his death. But they said "pneumonia related".Covid-19
It didn't have C19 otherwise they would have happily declared it the cause of his death. But they said "pneumonia related".
It is not that weird. Of course you can discuss exactly where the limit should be, but the amount of people severely affected by covid-19 below a certain age is very low. So for them the risk-reward analysis of the vaccines will of course not be the same as for older people.I don’t get actions like this - so at 29 you are at risk and then magically a year later you are not?
Generally with each booster the drop off reduces, hence why we have a lot of vaccinations which have 2 or 3 boosters and then you are pretty much good for life. If it drops to 60% effective after 6 months from the first booster (2nd dose) there is a good chance it will still be 80% effective 6 months after the second booster (3rd dose). Time will tell though, Israel data will lead the way.The threat of variants is overrated but I think we will need annual boosters simply because the immunity fades over time regardless.
I just mention variants because they are the kind of thing that can be much more precisely targeted with a combo vaccine that has multiple spike types.
There is no feasible way to hold China responsible without doing enormous financial harm to people who were never involved in the first place.![]()
Opinion | Science Closes In on Covid’s Origins
Four studies—including two from WHO—provide powerful evidence favoring the lab-leak theory.www.wsj.com
Interesting article from WSJ on an ever-growing case that the virus was indeed a result of Wuhan mishandling.
I’ll never stop beating the China drum. For such a global catastrophe…someone needs to be held accountable. Else, it’ll happen again.
Yeah we just don't know yet, unfortunately. But there are several companies trying to roll flu and Covid into one annual shot.Generally with each booster the drop off reduces, hence why we have a lot of vaccinations which have 2 or 3 boosters and then you are pretty much good for life. If it drops to 60% effective after 6 months from the first booster (2nd dose) there is a good chance it will still be 80% effective 6 months after the second booster (3rd dose). Time will tell though, Israel data will lead the way.
I''m sorry but that's possibly an associated cost. You still need to hold governments accountable for their actions, including those which were post-outbreak. If it really was a coverup, I would argue that CHINA did "enormous financial harm to people who were never involved in the first place" by allowing it happen, and by not assisting in the global effort to understand and stop the virus. I'm not saying they did 100%, as I will wait for conclusive evidence...but I certainly won't defend them either. Their actions (or lack thereof) have done a lot of the talking for me.There is no feasible way to hold China responsible without doing enormous financial harm to people who were never involved in the first place.
Don't get me wrong I think that their secrecy and their inaction at the beginning of this led to a large portion of the damage, but I don't believe an eye for an eye kind of situation is the best way to handle this.I''m sorry but that's possibly an associated cost. You still need to hold governments accountable for their actions, including those which were post-outbreak. If it really was a coverup, I would argue that CHINA did "enormous financial harm to people who were never involved in the first place" by allowing it happen, and by not assisting in the global effort to understand and stop the virus. I'm not saying they did 100%, as I will wait for conclusive evidence...but I certainly won't defend them either. Their actions (or lack thereof) have done a lot of the talking for me.
No, it doesn't.They say pneumonia related which means it's not directly by pneumonia.
It could have being plenty of things. But often such a sudden death (in an healthy person) is caused by blood clots. A pulmonary embolism can be related to pneumonia.
You know what also causes blood clots?
Did something bad happen with Moderna?
Ah thanks, a quick Google didn’t show that. I got Moderna so was anxious.Some country figured the risks of potential heart swelling was too high with the vaccine for people under a certain age. To my knowledge they're still allowing Pfizer and J&J.
Did something bad happen with Moderna?
....so we will continue to let the second largest economy in the world commit crimes against the world without repercussions. I really don't understand the Chinese sympathy from movies, celebs, NBA, industries, etc. We literally have cow-toed to China for long enough that we are now dependent on them. We are dependent on someone that we don't even have that great of relations with....why? Cheap labor? Large viewership base? We sold oursleves out long ago. It's time to rip the band aid off, if this was a global cover up. I don't think we will be the only ones willing to not play (the same kind of) ball with China anymore. We are enablers, turning blind eyes, for cheap profit. Meanwhile, so are they...but they only care about Chinese interests. They don't care about the UN, WHO, Uighurs, Taiwan, HK, their own citizens, USA (and other country's) intellectual properties, global currency manipulation, global democracy, region stabilization, alliances with 'bad actor' nations, etc.Don't get me wrong I think that their secrecy and their inaction at the beginning of this led to a large portion of the damage, but I don't believe an eye for an eye kind of situation is the best way to handle this.
There are so many industries that have been negatively affected already by the fallout of covid. Any kind of financial sanctions on China would just do that much more damage to the world's economy that is only just now starting to get back on track.
....so we will continue to let the second largest economy in the world commit crimes against the world without repercussions. I really don't understand the Chinese sympathy from movies, celebs, NBA, industries, etc. We literally have cow-toed to China for long enough that we are now dependent on them. We are dependent on someone that we don't even have that great of relations with....why? Cheap labor? Large viewership base? We sold oursleves out long ago. It's time to rip the band aid off, if this was a global cover up. I don't think we will be the only ones willing to not play (the same kind of) ball with China anymore. We are enablers, turning blind eyes, for cheap profit. Meanwhile, so are they...but they only care about Chinese interests. They don't care about the UN, WHO, Uighurs, Taiwan, HK, their own citizens, USA (and other country's) intellectual properties, global currency manipulation, global democracy, region stabilization, alliances with 'bad actor' nations, etc.
...What is the threshold? If COVID isn't the tipping point, then frankly, nothing is.