Macmanus
Member
Always-honest said:can we stop with retarded questions. djeezus fuck.
Can we stop responding to blatantly facetious quips like we are gullible children?
Always-honest said:can we stop with retarded questions. djeezus fuck.
clashfan said:Gears of War 3 will be the best looking console game!
Meus Renaissance said::lol Is my 360 relevant anymore after this news?
Rat Salad said:So irrelevant that you had to troll a console that has the best software lineup of 2010
canova said:GAF = GameFAQ 2.0
clashfan said:Gears of War 3 will be the best looking console game!
StuBurns said:![]()
Cause Sony are just that good...
You think it'll really look better than Killzone 2?Truespeed said:In the context of brown and grey based games, right?
JaseC said:I don't understand why GameFAQs receives all the hate when GameTrailers is infinitely worse.
canova said:that's just tongue and cheek
I'm not hating gameFAQ. actually love that site.
I think their players are infinitely better than GAF players
Violater said:PC and PS3 compatible![]()
Kenak said:You think it'll really look better than Killzone 2?
lol - I was responding to the 'good vs janky' control thing. Are you saying PC gamers really LOVE games with shitty controls, because there are games with 'janky' controls on the PC as well :lolghst said:people who want good controls don't play fps on console.
ONCE MORE UNTO THE BREACH DEAR FRIENDS!
:lolTruespeed said:Last time I checked my slide rule, 3 was still greater than 2.
clashfan said:Gears of War 3 will be the best looking console game!
Ninja-Matic said:So... developing on a platform from the ground up yields better results than porting...
In related news, water is wet. Details at 11.
you know you're getting trolled right?Jigsaw said:no 360 game using unreal engine 3 will EVER look better than killzone or uncharted
Amir0x said:I cannot believe I suffered six years of a shitty PC. Goddamn it was like torture. MY EYES ARE OPEN
their unreal tournament 3 port was really good, don't compare them to the developers they license their engine topainful fart said:Not saying the devs at Epic are stupid, but comparing any U3 game to Crysis 2 says a lot about how well crafted Cryteks engine is.
oversensitive said:their unreal tournament 3 port was really good, don't compare them to the developers they license their engine to
Cat in the Hat said:This thread is going to be nuked, I can taste it
Chrange said:lol - I was responding to the 'good vs janky' control thing. Are you saying PC gamers really LOVE games with shitty controls, because there are games with 'janky' controls on the PC as well :lol
duk said:this is exactly what crytek wants to happen, u guys are playing into their hands
JaseC said:I don't understand why GameFAQs receives all the hate when GameTrailers is infinitely worse.
hxa155 said:You should go visit System Wars at Gamespot forums. They're like animals.
Jones added that Crytek had no difficulty developing for the PS3 in comparison to the 360.
They're setting your expectations low so you'll be blownNemesisPrime said:They also claim to have large D****.
BTW why are they always demoing the obviously inferior version?
You forgot the biggest N4G.JaseC said:Somebody should buy out Gamespot/GameFAQs and GameTrailers, then consolidate the forum userbases.
My God.
Hm, I've never noticed I guess. Then again I'd never play it side-by-side to the 360 version so it doesn't matter anywaysDogenzaka said:Just glad to see decent-looking multiplatform games.
Assassin's Creed 2 pissed me off with its bland, un-contrasted, vaseline-smeared textures and screen tearing on the PS3. Ugh.
I <3 Memes said:Except that isnt what he meant at all. What he meant is a game like The Witcher that has a very different type of combat and play style or a game like Stalker that is brutally hard and unforgiving at the beginning of the game. Those types of games will never be a success on consoles. Most console gamers would give those games about 5 minutes then give up on them and never come back. The difference between a System Shock 2 and Bioshock are perfect examples of this.
Kenak said:Hm, I've never noticed I guess. Then again I'd never play it side-by-side to the 360 version so it doesn't matter anyways![]()
Dogenzaka said:I made the mistake of watching the 360 version in action before I played my copy.
It ruined the experience for me, almost.![]()
Warhead had lots of videos, pre-rendered in-engine FMVs and compression wasn't very good, I think they used bink for encoding. original Crysis had none, everything was real-time IIRC. I hope they go the real-time route for this one, specially on 360 because of disc space issues.nelsonroyale said:Huh, most places said there was little difference between teh versions visually...certainly the differences between the first were more in performance than visuals..
Anyway, just got round to watching the last trailer...if thats ingame I will have to agree that it is the best looking console game overall... It may even look better than the original on pc. The trailer is a different beast when you watch it in HD. That bland soldier actually looks better than your average Korean in Crysis. Doesn't seem like they are making teh cutscenes purely ingame anymore though...
NemesisPrime said:They also claim to have large D****.
BTW why are they always demoing the obviously inferior version?
nelsonroyale said:Huh, most places said there was little difference between teh versions visually...certainly the differences between the first were more in performance than visuals..
Anyway, just got round to watching the last trailer...if thats ingame I will have to agree that it is the best looking console game overall... It may even look better than the original on pc. The trailer is a different beast when you watch it in HD. That bland soldier actually looks better than your average Korean in Crysis. Doesn't seem like they are making teh cutscenes purely ingame anymore though...
Jigsaw said:no 360 game using unreal engine 3 will EVER look better than killzone or uncharted