The Evil Ganon
Member
Contact. Damn man, what an awesome closer.
I'm not sure I agree with this post of yours, (you did say "think", though ) but the rest of what you've said I find it hard to argue with. So much so, that the albums you've listed in this post I'll be checking out post-haste (the ones I'm not already familiar with, obviously).I think Discovery is their weakest album next to this one.
Really, really can't hear that. Maybe it's in the placement of the tracks on the album, but that's it. Other than that, I can't hear anything that's similar b/w RAM and Beaucoup at all. And man, I *loved* BC. Curious to think why you think one's reminiscent of the other (genuinely... it seems like a fascinating line you've drawn).Might be too mainstream, but, definitely get a Beaucoup Fish vibe listening to this stuff.
*slow clap with Giorgio*I listen to plenty of electronic music thankyouverymuch and this album sounds fresh as fuck to me. Certain people are quick to point out the lack of originality yet I haven't seen anyone have the balls to produce some specific examples. You've thrown down some albums from bands in the electronic genre, big whoop. Doesn't really back up your argument.
Let's not turn into a dick measuring contest where we argue about who listens to more electronic music, plz thnx.
To me- they are very specifically trying to evoke certain sounds of an era. The issue for me is the difference between creating something that can stand on it's own, versus something that gets by on the strengths of the music it's aping.Is a song only good if it's doing something that hasn't been done before?
I always struggle with the "this has been done before" argument in music. I have a hard time caring if music is groundbreaking or not. It just needs to sound good.
I'm not sure I agree with this post of yours, (you did say "think", though ) but the rest of what you've said I find it hard to argue with. So much so, that the albums you've listed in this post I'll be checking out post-haste (the ones I'm not already familiar with, obviously).
I'll also be e-stalking you on GAF in the future to see what else you listen to... you seem pretty damn well switched on.
<3 Shaneus
Really, really can't hear that. Maybe it's in the placement of the tracks on the album, but that's it. Other than that, I can't hear anything that's similar b/w RAM and Beaucoup at all. And man, I *loved* BC. Curious to think why you think one's reminiscent of the other (genuinely... it seems like a fascinating line you've drawn).
Obviously finding a carbon copy of RAM isn't possible but the music on it isn't "new" by any stretch and anyone who says otherwise doesn't listen to enough electronic music.
The more I listen to it the more ingenious it is to put JC's vocals under the vocoder, with just enough of his actual sound coming through. It pushes a 9 song over the top.I'm really liking instant crush as one of the tracks that's growing on me.
Smash these albums together with a hammer and throw it in a disgusting stew with every cheesy funk album from the 70's and you have random access memories. If you want more I have about 200 where these came from.
http://www.discogs.com/Copy-Hard-Dream/master/351549
http://www.discogs.com/Bibio-Mind-Bokeh/master/323491
http://www.discogs.com/Javelin-Hi-Beams/master/555662
http://www.discogs.com/Chemical-Brothers-Surrender/master/25210
http://www.discogs.com/Album-Leaf-In-A-Safe-Place/master/1653
http://www.discogs.com/65daysofstatic-The-Fall-Of-Math/master/185358
if you're going to claim RAM "isn't new" (which it isn't) by way of citing other examples, at least list some nu disco, funk, or 70s revival examples. chemical brothers--especially surrender--does not sound like RAM, like at all.
Breakbot - Baby I'm Yours
Phoenix - If I Ever Feel Better
Cassius - Rock Number One
Ghostland Observatory - Stranger Lover
these are all songs from acts that incorporate or outright produce music using instrumentation, composition, or just "sounds" from the 70s with a specifically "funk" or "disco" feel. do any of these songs sound exactly like RAM? no. and that's not what anyone (sane) is arguing. but if we're now going to start judging musicality and artistic merit on "has anyone ever done this exact same thing?" then there is zero hope for intelligent discourse in this thread.
Obviously finding a carbon copy of RAM isn't possible but the music on it isn't "new" by any stretch and anyone who says otherwise doesn't listen to enough electronic music.
Lol, this sounds just like the entry level music comment. Fucking hell.
They've said that they'll mix together their old works when they finally do another tour.
Imagine, say, Get Lucky and One More Time together...
of course it doesnt. you don't listen to enough electronic music.hahah what
This makes no sense.
I think there are a lot of posters in here going the other way though. Like fully bought into the hype that this was going to be a work of genius...that every single millisecond was engineered to the point of perfection.
And de Homem-Christo, who has said maybe a few dozen words up to this point, most of them about salad and directed at our waitress, peers over the golden top edge of his sunglasses and says: "So our new album is supposed to really suck."
I also get the feeling that they never quite left the majestic orchestral overtones of the TRON Soundtrack behind when they were making RAM.
of course it doesnt. you don't listen to enough electronic music.
Recommend me some electronic music. I do not know a lot besides Daft Punk, Washed Out, Animal Collective, and James Blake.
To me- they are very specifically trying to evoke certain sounds of an era. The issue for me is the difference between creating something that can stand on it's own, versus something that gets by on the strengths of the music it's aping.
Will.I.Am.
FYI, found an Australian interview:
Hear Daft Punk, in Rare Radio Interview, Say 'Get Lucky' Sums Up Celebratory LP
"Most of the ideas behind this record are ideas of celebration," the duo said. "It turns out to be a very optimistic record with very celebratory and optimistic lyrics, and it's coming out in a world that is not so optimistic, and which is somehow maybe more cynical and slightly pessimistic."
I'm still struggling with the critique. How do you differentiate between the two, and is something that gets by on the strengths of the genre its inspired by not capable of "standing on its own"? Hell, what does that even mean?
Could you post some examples?
Genuinely curious.
It means that I have to stop and think whether it succeeds on its own, or whether it succeeds because of how evocative it is of certain sounds from the era its trying to evoke. I'm not the only one who has questioned this, there were other posters asking this very thing and a few early reviews brought up this very issue.
Space - Magic Fly
Basically the entire Italo Disco, Space Disco and late electronic Krautrock scene.
Lol, this sounds just like the entry level music comment. Fucking hell.
To me it's a ridiculous argument, because it is akin to subjectively penalizing music for being music.It means that I have to stop and think whether it succeeds on its own, or whether it succeeds because of how evocative it is of certain sounds from the era its trying to evoke. I'm not the only one who has questioned this, there were other posters asking this very thing and a few early reviews brought up this very issue.
I think Justice did a better job at the whole throwback retro rock/disco/funk thing while still staying "true to their roots" with AVD.
I think Justice did a better job at the whole throwback retro rock/disco/funk thing while still staying "true to their roots" with AVD.