uncelestial
Member
Uh huh, and Leia, who is force sensitive, has no idea she's hugging her own daughter?Cus she was six/seven at the time maybe? Depends on the timeline of when the temple was destroyed.
Please.
Uh huh, and Leia, who is force sensitive, has no idea she's hugging her own daughter?Cus she was six/seven at the time maybe? Depends on the timeline of when the temple was destroyed.
I don't think the Force awakening has to be an explicit event, and is best described vaguely. The Force is like a large fluid medium that's been sitting still for a long time. The Force awakening is like a pebble (a disturbance, if you will) dropped in a still pond, creating ripples that radiate outward. Rey could be the pebble, or she could just be the first to hop on a surfboard as the ripples turn into waves. Maybe the lightsaber is just a metaphorical surfboard or a force sensitive compass pointing her where she needs to go.So assuming the awakening is indeed that particular moment, it sounds like Snoke is merely sensing Rey's presence in the force for the first time, which is no different from Qui Gon sensing Anakin for the first time ("I sense a vergence in the force" ... "located around a person?" etc.).
In that case why is Rey's existence significant? Is she something special like Anakin? And if so is Luke too far away to sense her too? Or does he just not care?
And if Rey is a special being birthed from the force is she a result of someone tampering with it like Plagueous/Sidious did or is there a different cause behind her awakening?
Basically what I hope to learn in the next films is whether Rey's power manifesting is the awakening in question (which makes her Space Jesus 2: Electric Boogaloo) or is she merely a symptom of a deeper event which is the actual awakening of the force.
Robot hand touching R2 in the vision will end up being Rey's. Luke is already dead. "Stop taking my hand." Rey is Skywalker reincarnated.
Obi-wan saying "these are your first steps" is in reference to her literal first steps as a toddler.
I have no idea what I'm talking about.
I think the Force awakening can be explained much simpler, and more vaguely. The Force is like a large fluid medium that's been sitting still for a long time. The Force awakening is like a pebble dropped in a still pond. Rey could be the pebble, or she could just be the first to hop on a surfboard as the ripples turn into waves. Maybe the lightsaber is just a metaphorical surfboard or a force sensitive compass pointing her where she needs to go.
Snoke doesn't explicitly know she is involved from the start, he just senses the ripples. Similarly, Luke probably sensed the ripples too, felt that something was coming on the waves, and that something was Rey.
The Force could be acting deliberately to make the wakes, or reacting to whatever disturbs it. Maybe Luke disturbed it, or is seeking the source of the disturbance. He's clearly looking deeper than others have looked before. It's supposed to be vague. We'll find out.
Why do you need exposition? The film is called The Force Awakens, the word "awakens" implying all you need. We all saw the last major disruption in the "balance" of the force snuffed out (the Sith and maybe the Jedi too). That doesn't mean the force was completely dormant, obviously Luke and Kylo were using it in the interim, but nothing as major as a Sith Emperor ruling the galaxy with his right hand man Evil Space Jesus. Now something new is happening for us to find out, next time on The Star Wars.The bolded is what bugs me. We know almost nothing about the period between episode VI and VII. Who's to say the force has been sitting still over that time? That's a really important piece of exposition the audience would need to know in order for the awakening to live up to its name.
Why do you need exposition? The film is called The Force Awakens, the word "awakens" implying all you need. We all saw the last major disruption in the "balance" of the force snuffed out (the Sith and maybe the Jedi too). That doesn't mean the force was completely dormant, obviously Luke and Kylo were using it in the interim, but nothing as major as a Sith Emperor ruling the galaxy with his right hand man Evil Space Jesus. Now something new is happening for us to find out, next time on The Star Wars.
None of this needs to be explained or made explicit.
Doesn't the phrase "business as usual" imply some state of equilibrium? I never said the force no longer existed or, per the fluid analogy, people couldn't still swim around in it. Teaching a bunch of kids how to swim is hardly the same as a galactic Sith threat making waves in the pool. I'd be comfortable saying the Force went and layed down for awhile under those conditions. The Force was sleeping, maybe tossing and turning every now and then. it wasn't dead.Wasn't Luke training new Jedi? That sounds more like business as usual than the force being partially dormant..
So assuming the awakening is indeed that particular moment, it sounds like Snoke is merely sensing Rey's presence in the force for the first time, which is no different from Qui Gon sensing Anakin for the first time ("I sense a vergence in the force" ... "located around a person?" etc.).
In that case why is Rey's existence significant? Is she something special like Anakin? And if so is Luke too far away to sense her too? Or does he just not care?
And if Rey is a special being birthed from the force is she a result of someone tampering with it like Plagueous/Sidious did or is there a different cause behind her awakening?
Basically what I hope to learn in the next films is whether Rey's power manifesting is the awakening in question (which makes her Space Jesus 2: Electric Boogaloo) or is she merely a symptom of a deeper event which is the actual awakening of the force.
Doesn't the phrase "business as usual" imply some state of equilibrium? I never said the force no longer existed or, per the fluid analogy, people couldn't still swim around in it. Teaching a bunch of kids how to swim is hardly the same as a galactic Sith threat making waves in the pool. I'd be comfortable saying the Force went and layed down for awhile under those conditions. The Force was sleeping, maybe tossing and turning every now and then. it wasn't dead.
This analogy is getting out of hand.
Perhaps Luke performed a ritualistic awakening on the island ?
Sure, Anakin was more or less called Space Jesus in the Prequels, but all Rey's been called so far is a nobody. I'd be wary of applying the Dragon Ball Z power level mentality to the vagary of the Force, especially when the only context you've been given is a few tricks, some ace piloting, and a successful fight against a mentally and physically damaged individual. Whether she is the awakening or a by-product of the awakening is a mystery to be explored at a later date.I could definitely be reading too much into the title of the film, but compared with A New Hope or The Phantom Menace, TFA sounds like a monumental event. Anakin Skywalker's existence was supposedly so significant nothing like it had happened in millennia and Rey appears to be more powerful than him at the same stage.
Rey is actually related to the Emperor (he even has the accent). I don't know how, but that's how I'd want it to be in my head canon. Until of course Lucas Films sets me straight lol.
Daisy said that she thought it was abundantly clear after TFA who who her parents were. This wouldn't make sense right?
Maz rules it out.
(go back to page 16 of this thread)
(Because this thread is a Choose Your Own Adventure now)
"Dear child. I see your eyes. You already know the truth. Whomever you're waiting for on Jakku... they're never coming back... But... there's someone who still could.
Rey: Luke."
Luke can't be her dad becaues Maz just said that the family she's waiting for on Jakku isn't coming back - and then SPECIFICALLY says Luke still could. Thus delineating between "your family" and "Luke Skywalker"
Luke Skywalker can't be her family because if he was that sentence would make zero sense.
Maz doesn't say her family though
I however really don't see the Obi Wan connection to be honest, in none of the films has it even been hinted at that he has some sort of family elsewhere in secret. All her visual visions had something to do with Anakin or Luke, her past and future, and the closest mention of the character is that Kylo was named after him. If Obi-Wan was a relative of hers I feel like her would have had more of a presence in the film.
Why would it have been hinted to this point? It was also never hinted anywhere in Star Wars that Vader was Luke's dad.
And so far as Obi-Wan having a presence, he speaks directly to her at the end of the vision.
This is all covered on page 16 and 17, yes.
Maz is very obviously talking about Rey's family. She doesn't have to specifically say it, it's obvious who it is she's talking about. It's a conversation. And the conversation wouldn't make any sense if it weren't obvious who the principals were. She IS saying "Stop waiting" to Rey, she is saying "you need to move forward," that's not in question.
That Rey says "Luke" and not Maz doesn't really mean anything as a distinction, because that's exactly where Maz is leading her, just like you'd lead any student to an answer you know is the right one, but they haven't figured out for themselves just yet.
Why would it have been hinted to this point? It was also never hinted anywhere in Star Wars that Vader was Luke's dad.
And so far as Obi-Wan having a presence, he speaks directly to her at the end of the vision.
This is all covered on page 16 and 17, yes.
Maz is very obviously talking about Rey's family. She doesn't have to specifically say it, it's obvious who it is she's talking about. It's a conversation. And the conversation wouldn't make any sense if it weren't obvious who the principals were. She IS saying "Stop waiting" to Rey, she is saying "you need to move forward," that's not in question.
That Rey says "Luke" and not Maz doesn't really mean anything as a distinction, because that's exactly where Maz is leading her, just like you'd lead any student to an answer you know is the right one, but they haven't figured out for themselves just yet.
Why would it have been hinted to this point? It was also never hinted anywhere in Star Wars that Vader was Luke's dad.
And so far as Obi-Wan having a presence, he speaks directly to her at the end of the vision.
Obi-Wan talking to Rey I see as nothing more than how he guided Luke to face his destiny.
The main problem I have with the theory is I don't see the story significance of her being a descendant of Obi Wan
Because she's connected to LUKE
Hell Yoda speaks to her too
Isn't Darth Vader literally Dark Father in Dutch?
Isn't Darth Vader literally Dark Father in Dutch?
Because she's connected to LUKE and through Luke Anakin, Hell Yoda speaks to her too. Obi-wan tells her what he told Luke, that these were her first steps (Into a Larger world). In her vision she appeared everywhere Luke had been in the past. You had Luke's Master and Anakin's Master telling there's more to her then she knows. Come on it's all right there.