Dark Knight Rises v Man of Steel (Which one sucked more?)

Which one sucked more?


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Anyone who likes decent cinema and has grown up on legitimately good action flicks will not like Furious 7. Others will I suppose which is why this turd is sitting at 81%. Maybe if the director shook that camera even more during the mind numbingly boring action sequences it would cross 90%.

You sound fun at parties.
 

guek

Banned
I hate when people bring up RT like that's a good metric of quality. Even the user scores paint a totally different picture with MoS at 78% and TDKR at 90%. The disparity goes from 32 to 12.

And I hate when people try to argue reviews can't tell you anything about a film's quality. RT scores tell you little about whether or not a specific person will like a movie but it act as a general barometer.
 

Percy

Banned
Man of Steel easily.

Both are dumb as shit but TDKR at least doesn't feel like it misses the point of it's character completely.
 
Man of Steel is fun, cool and dumb.

TDKR was just super dumb.

And I really really don't like superman.

Same. TDKR is even worse as it comes off the back of of an amazing film in TDK. Man of Steel has to deal with Superman's character which is extremely difficult because he is practically a god.
 
For that last jumping punch that Bane does to Bats, it never looked right to me. It always looked like his fist never connected with Batman's face and he was just punching air instead, with Bale falling down afterwards.

All of Nolan's action sequences are kinda ass. They look good on the big screen, but if you slow them down you can easily pick them apart. He's not a great director when it comes to that stuff. He instead relies on camera positions than choreography.
 

DonasaurusRex

Online Ho Champ
TDKR is higher up imho, wasn't as good as the first two but it gets points for being connected to two of the best comic book movies ever.
 

A_Gorilla

Banned
All of Nolan's action sequences are kinda ass. They look good on the big screen, but if you slow them down you can easily pick them apart. He's not a great director when it comes to that stuff. He instead relies on camera positions than choreography.

I'd rather have a director who's shit with action scenes but great at everything than one with mediocre action scenes but shit with everything else *cough* Snyder *cough*
 

mdubs

Banned
Man of Steel for me, because it didn't deliver on any of my expectations of providing character development for Superman. Dark Knight Rises was enjoyable for Batman facing off with a great performance as Bane by Tom Hardy so I got what I came for there.

To the best Batman introduction of any Batman movie, ever
P39mnzi.gif

This so much, one of my favourite moments. I loved the equivalent in Dark Knight but this was so good plus that soundtrack kicking in gives me shivers
 

IconGrist

Member
And I hate when people try to argue reviews can't tell you anything about a film's quality. RT scores tell you little about whether or not a specific person will like a movie but it act as a general barometer.

They tell you nothing unless you read the reviews. And how many actually do? Do you? Or do you just look at the score and go "oh, it must be shit."

I saw a rotten review that basically bitched about the movie not being a sequel to the Donnerverse and had very little content about the movie itself. Mentioned Returns more than anything.

Is that a fair review to add to that barometer? I sure as hell don't think so.
 
I'd rather have a director who's shit with action scenes but great at everything than one with mediocre action scenes but shit with everything else *cough* Snyder *cough*

Well yeah me too. Just saying that action sequences are Nolan's weakness.

Snyder is not even good with mediocre action scenes. There is no pacing or build up. Everyone and everything JUST EXPLODES.
 
I've never seen the OP make a post and glanced at the board with the name and thought to myself: I didn't make a thread about this.. wtf

And I haven't seen MoS but Rises definitely had many issues with it, but it was fun.
 

Hixx

Member
Man of Steel was genuinely one of the most boring films I've ever seen.

TDKR was the weakest of the trilogy but it's fucking miles ahead of Man of Steel.
 

outsida

Member
TDKR as I had no expectations for Man of Steel. Coming off of the other movies I was really hyped for TDKR and it was a big let down to me.
 
And I hate when people try to argue reviews can't tell you anything about a film's quality. RT scores tell you little about whether or not a specific person will like a movie but it act as a general barometer.

sites like RT tend to rate any average blockbuster above 70% and decent dramas above that too

But it's so hard to gauge quality on stuff from the really divisive directors like lynch, or cronenberg etc. when looking at these ratings. I honestly think it's silly to hold so much regard for RT ratings. People should just pick a reviewer they trust or look at other impressions to gauge a feeling for the film
 

WillyFive

Member
Well yeah me too. Just saying that action sequences are Nolan's weakness.

Snyder is not even good with mediocre action scenes. There is no pacing or build up. Everyone and everything JUST EXPLODES.

Yeah. He has a spectacular ability to make a sequence that in theory should be awesome and exciting feel completely monotone and bland.
 

Blader

Member
Yes. Because that's exactly what TASM2, Iron Man 2 and Thor 2 were.

Exactly it.

As if levity was the chief problem with any of those films.

Every Man of Steel thread always turns up at least one person who goes the "DC should just add more jokes and quips like marvel amirite" route as if tone was just one or the other, or as if most of the movies in this genre even adhere strictly to one or the other.
 

guek

Banned
They tell you nothing unless you read the reviews.

I don't think you actually believe that. You're telling me you can't objectively take anything at all from a RT score of 88 vs. 56? I agree that you can't decide whether an individual will like a movie solely on those numbers but that doesn't mean they're useless.

sites like RT tend to rate any average blockbuster above 70% and decent dramas above that too

But it's so hard to gauge quality on stuff from the really divisive directors like lynch, or cronenberg etc. when looking at these ratings. I honestly think it's silly to hold so much regard for RT ratings. People should just pick a reviewer they trust or look at other impressions to gauge a feeling for the film

I agree that RT and Metacritic are both given too much weight.
 

IconGrist

Member
Yes, I put that effort in a single post just for lols.

I've seen it happen, to be honest.

Also, you are free to view TDKR as you please but the pictures and gifs you posted largely make the targeted points of your post come off like a joke. Those were all easily the worst parts of the movie in my opinion.
 
I really can't objectively look at RT scores anymore. They've been really misleading

In my experience, movies that are rated rotten are most usually rotten. Like Man of Steel.

But movies that are rated fresh can be hit or miss, but there are worse ways of trying to find a decent flick.
 

Blader

Member
The big percentages just tell you how many people like a movie. The average rating below it is what you want -- by how much did people like a movie.
 

meppi

Member
I couldn't even remember anything about TDKR till someone posted Bane gifs. Then, it somewhat came back to me.

As for Man of Steel... I couldn't even finish the movie.
Got up to the tornado part and said: fuck this shit and turned it off.
 

Eidan

Member
Or atleast those who form their own opinions rather than appealing to popularity as a defense.
Man, I'm in a precarious situation. I like two films that are both well reviewed and well liked by audiences. I guess I should build up my street cred. Uhh, I think the original Star Wars is kinda boring. How was that?
 

IconGrist

Member
I don't think you actually believe that. You're telling me you can't objectively take anything at all from a RT score of 88 vs. 56? I agree that you can't decide whether an individual will like a movie solely on those numbers but that doesn't mean they're useless.

I can because I don't compare scores. The only time I even see things like that are when they get brought up. Not to mention I'm not a fan of comparisons for the first movie in a series to a sequel of another series.

If this was an MoS v Batman Begins thread I'm all for it.

And for the record, Batman Begins was much better than MoS, imo.
 

Game4life

Banned
Man, I'm in a precarious situation. I like two films that are both well reviewed and well liked by audiences. I guess I should build up my street cred. Uhh, I think the original Star Wars is kinda boring. How was that?

No you should try to think and formulate your own opinion. May be hard for you but try. If you like it its fine. You cant expect everyone to like it because Rotten Tomatoes told you so.
 

atr0cious

Member
Say what you want, TDKR was a Batman ass Batman movie. Man of Steel wasn't a great Superman movie.

TDKR is fun to re watch too, flaws aside.

Your avatar shows your bias, especially with the final bomb scene being an homage to it. Nolan needs to learn to subvert his themes instead of slaving himself to them. It is a Batman ass movie to the fullest though.
 

Well, if there is one thing that Man of Steel did better, it was the action. But that isn't saying much considering how terrible Nolan is at directing good action set pieces. Dark Knight Rises was his best work, and yet it still looks so laughable.

I can't really decide which one I liked more. To be honest, I didn't really care for either all that much.
 

Game4life

Banned
Well, if there is one thing that Man of Steel did better, it was the action. But that isn't saying much considering how terrible Nolan is at directing good action set pieces. Dark Knight Rises was his best work, and yet it still looks so laughable.

I can't really decide which one I liked more. To be honest, I didn't really care for either all that much.

Yeah Nolan has a long way to go in that front. Hopefully he works with better stunt directors in the future.
 

Blader

Member
This alone proves why TDKR is so bad. How many scenes have Batman coming from off screen to aid or attack someone? It's so bad, it made me think he went back on his promise to Fox.

Faora hopefully shows up again, she was great to watch.

He's coming off screen because the gif is cropped. The real shot starts with Batman in the center of the frame.
 

guek

Banned
Yeah Nolan has a long way to go in that front. Hopefully he works with better stunt directors in the future.

Both Nolan and Snyder confuse the fuck out of me with how uninterested they seem to be in certain areas of filmmaking. Nolan loves world building, and he puts so much energy into telling the story he wants in the way he wants to but then half asses the combat scenes in his action movies. Snyder puts so much emphasis on visual flair and presentation but seems to hardly even read his scripts. Both are mind boggling but Nolan probably moreso since he's a much more well rounded and talented director.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom