sorry guys, too many cinematics thread
please dont hit
"...$300 million in total home entertainment sales and rentals around the world. Audiences gave it a Cinemascore of “A-”, which is pretty good and which helps account for the healthy home entertainment numbers despite its somewhat misleading reputation as a film rejected by a lot of viewers. The truth is, yes the film had mixed reactions and yes it had some flaws, but also yes it was overall popular with most audiences, and yes it made a healthy amount at the box office and on home entertainment."
I sometimes think this gets lost in the shuffle when discussing MoS. It is very divisive online, but it did have a pretty sizable audience of people who enjoyed it or heard good enough things about it that they checked it out when it came out.
Are there any dope iPhone 6s DC cases ?
sorry guys, too many cinematics thread
please dont hit
Max Landis just went on a rant on twitter about this movie
He's a bit cray, but this rant was specially cray.Max Landis just went on a rant on twitter about this movie
What is Landis saying now?
What is Landis saying now?
Don't forget he's the brillaint mind behind 2015's biggest bomba, Victor Frankenstein.Max Landis ‏@Uptomyknees 9m9 minutes ago
My main issue with Batman Versus Superman is that it makes the finale of Man Of Steel the touchstone centerpiece of the entire plot.
Max Landis ‏@Uptomyknees 9m9 minutes ago
This was obviously not the plan; I don't believe for a second they intended the ending of Man Of Steel to draw the reactions it did.
Max Landis ‏@Uptomyknees 8m8 minutes ago
My issue is that that ending, wherein literally THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE DIE, thematically permanently tarnishes Superman
No coming back from it
Max Landis ‏@Uptomyknees 8m8 minutes ago
Superman's first exposure to the world is being one degree of separation responsible/incontrovertibly linked to an incident worse than 9/11.
Max Landis ‏@Uptomyknees 8m8 minutes ago
I'm not saying they should've just glossed over it, but...maybe they should have? I mean there's no reason to root for Superman at all.
Max Landis ‏@Uptomyknees 5m5 minutes ago
weird to think about. I'm all for destruction in movies. It's just weird to tie such a horrific incident to Superman going forward.
Max Landis ‏@Uptomyknees 4m4 minutes ago
At the end of Man of Steel, Superman literally makes out with a near stranger on a pile of rubble/probably dead bodies.
Basically that there is no reason to root for Superman because a lot of people died on his watch. Also doesn't like that the destruction in Metropolis is the story focus of Batman v Superman.
Don't forget he's the brillaint mind behind 2015's biggest bomba, Victor Frankenstein.
He's a screewriter. Orci and Kurtzman tier, but a screenwriter anyway.Oh, he's a director. Thought he was a journalist.
Oh, he's a director. Thought he was a journalist.
Don't forget he's the brillaint mind behind 2015's biggest bomba, Victor Frankenstein.
What's weird is that he's writing a really fantastic Superman comic right now that's all about Clark being human and a little bit flawed.
Basically that there is no reason to root for Superman because a lot of people died on his watch. Also doesn't like that the destruction in Metropolis is the story focus of Batman v Superman.
Maybe he's just upset they don't let him in on the movie stuffWhat's weird is that he's writing a really fantastic Superman comic right now that's all about Clark being human and a little bit flawed.
So I just came across this
I like the BvS costume but my god I want that one on the right like NAOW.
So I just came across this
I like the BvS costume but my god I want that one on the right like NAOW.
He forgot to mention that most of the damage to Metropolis was done well before Superman ever got there. Besides Zod destroying what I'm guessing was the Wayne Financial building with his heat vision (which I got the sense that he kind of lost control of, being new to having powers), the fight between Superman and Zod mostly only damaged the sides of a few buildings, though they did destroy a parking garage.
Don't forget he's the brillaint mind behind 2015's biggest bomba, Victor Frankenstein.
The complaints about destruction are so immersive, like in-universe arguments against Superman's existence. Gotta be viral marketing, right?
It was indeed himself.Didn't someone suggest Lex Luthor was based on Max Landis?probably Max Landis
Wait what? I haven't heard this rumor yet.
I would like to think it's starting to piss a number of the level headed people off. The negative hits toward the film just seem to based on nothing I think and I hope people see that. It's not like particular things are producing the over the top negative reactions. It's as if people are hitting it just to hit it at this point. I can understand being concerned a film will be bad. We all have those feelings. Looking at comments in various places there is a group of people that honestly want it fail and are praying it does at times. I don't get that.
Didn't someone suggest Lex Luthor was based on Max Landis?probably Max Landis
Leave Max alone.
Leave Max alone.
and He's seen the movie. He's also a huge Superman fanboy.
don't people hate the new52 Supes costume? I don't mind it personally.
There is an error here. He's not a huge Superman fanboy. He's a huge fanboy of his Superman.
And when did he say he saw the movie?
don't people hate the new52 Supes costume? I don't mind it personally.
Landis always, from what I've been able to see, ignores that Man of Steel is an origin story. He never really accepts that it's a film about Clark on the road to becoming Superman and when he gets the title it's still day 1. His complaints with the film always show that he refuses to acknowledge the basic story as it's presented. He does so in favor of his version of Superman that he wants and deems the best and only version. Followed up by what he would have done instead. That's annoying as well.