kylecoley182
Banned
As I'm getting everything batman and superman and JL
I wasn't huge on the Panopticon, tbh. Felt really ham-fisted, especially with Superman standing up to police brutality over in Action at that exact time, in a much more interesting way.
Still, will give this a shot.
Go read some Priest Black Panther real quick.
Go read some Priest Black Panther real quick.
I cannot second this enough
Here's the thing, though: The first issue of Red Hood and the Outlaws at the start of the New 52 has Jason stating the only reason Kori likes him is because he reminds her of Dick because they were part of the old TT. Roy even asks her if she remembers the team. So, Dick very clearly was on the TT in the New 52
I skipped New 52 completely, is it time for me to jump back in?
Apparently, Justice League #50 will reveal the Joker's name.
Personally, do. not. want. The Joker's better off without one because that's what keeps him interesting. He can be from wherever, whoever, or whatever, and it gives writers a huge scope to play with the character. Giving him a name makes him tangible, and that sucks the mystique out of the character.
I feel like the Joker has to evolve at some point. Everyone loves him as a villain so much, but I feel like he has such little depth. The only depth he has isn't even solely his: it's how he plays off of Batman. Like, I guess giving him a solid history might damage some of him, but goddamn if you're gonna have a character be this popular and at the forefront then do something with him. Giving him a name isn't all that destructive if there isn't a fully cemented history.Apparently, Justice League #50 will reveal the Joker's name.
Personally, do. not. want. The Joker's better off without one because that's what keeps him interesting. He can be from wherever, whoever, or whatever, and it gives writers a huge scope to play with the character. Giving him a name makes him tangible, and that sucks the mystique out of the character.
Makes more sense, thenMany initial issues had references to pre-flashpoint continuity that were quickly written out (often even rewriting the text for the trades). DC originally had said that the New 52 wasn't a reboot, and some of hose issues seemed to be written with that in mind. However, its initial success seemed to convince them to push it as a radical break point, cutting ties with the previous continuity in a stronger way after that.
I feel it will be a whooole lot of nothing. The thing I dont want is the definite history, i liked the way Snyder played with the concept a bunch during Endgame but left the whole multiple choice thing at the end.
Unless the whole twist is that even the Mobiud Chair thinks Joker has no name. Which would be dumb but o well
As for pull lists...i plan on being an idiot and getting every Rebirth issue and then seeing what I like.
But... Joker's real name islJoe Kerr.
I'll definitely try the Red Lantern book. I love Soule's Marvel work but i felt i had to give GL a rest after Johns so i didnt pick it up all but that does sound really good.Charles Soule's Red Lanterns stuff was widely praised. Its basically Sons of Anarchy in space if that's your thing. I also really liked the Justin Jordan New Guardian book. Tons of action and adventure. Some were upset bythe Kyle - Carol Ferris romance
Don't read any of the Robert Venditti and Van Jensen run. It is just disgraceful. Venditti has the imagination of a cockroach and I wouldn't trust Van Jensen to write a fifth grade book report. I don't know why John's is letting them still write GL. It must be some weird BDSM fetish because this run can't get any worse.
Apparently, Justice League #50 will reveal the Joker's name.
Personally, do. not. want. The Joker's better off without one because that's what keeps him interesting. He can be from wherever, whoever, or whatever, and it gives writers a huge scope to play with the character. Giving him a name makes him tangible, and that sucks the mystique out of the character.
Joker is Thomas Wayne
Made emotions a limited resourceI've lots of things about Venditti. What exactly did he do?
Made emotions a limited resource
Absolutely right. Marvel did it with Wolverine, and what did it add? The killing joke was smart enough to mention it was "one of many origins".Apparently, Justice League #50 will reveal the Joker's name.
Personally, do. not. want. The Joker's better off without one because that's what keeps him interesting. He can be from wherever, whoever, or whatever, and it gives writers a huge scope to play with the character. Giving him a name makes him tangible, and that sucks the mystique out of the character.
Apparently, Justice League #50 will reveal the Joker's name.
Personally, do. not. want. The Joker's better off without one because that's what keeps him interesting. He can be from wherever, whoever, or whatever, and it gives writers a huge scope to play with the character. Giving him a name makes him tangible, and that sucks the mystique out of the character.
On the other hand, this is the Superman who can see in 4-D, the one who crossed the bleed into the orrery of worlds, going to limbo and back in the span of a breath to save his wife. This is the one who possessed a thought machine to fight back a primordial vampire of stories. This is the one who beat a manifestation of pure evil with a song. The one who memorized a miracle machine's schematics, built it, and saved the world. Because he is Superman. And I love Final Crisis.Can we keep in mind that this is the same Superman that after the US Government had Lex Luthor commit Genecide on the 100 thousand Kandorians (the majority of which were innocent civilians) from the bottled city went walk about across the US instead of doing something about it? The same one who renounced his US citizenship, The same Guy who sat out Final Crises cause Lois was injured and only got involved because of Deus Ex Whathefuckery. Distance, go figure. This is the Same one who beat the Fuck out of Batman whilst under Max Lord's control then got piss off cause Wonder Woman Killed Max to free him. This is the Hypocrite we have back, who's been illegally detaining potential criminals cause they were a danger on his world. If they wanted to bring a married Superman back why not the one from the end of Whatever happened to the man of Tomorrow, That was Superman. Not this Guy who lost his title to Batman as DC flagship character. Yeah buddy, Superman had been the end all, be all till your wishy washy yuppie ass came on board. Hell even the Original Superman found him wanting.
Joker is Thomas Wayne
whatever happened with the story that revealed Joker has actually been alive for centuries? I think it was one of the Snyder and Capullo onesApparently, Justice League #50 will reveal the Joker's name.
Personally, do. not. want. The Joker's better off without one because that's what keeps him interesting. He can be from wherever, whoever, or whatever, and it gives writers a huge scope to play with the character. Giving him a name makes him tangible, and that sucks the mystique out of the character.
Ugh.., End Game. Snyder walked into Midtown Comics, asking employees what customers thought of his Batman stories. Very insecure writer.whatever happened with the story that revealed Joker has actually been alive for centuries? I think it was one of the Snyder and Capullo ones
Was that just a feint or real?
whatever happened with the story that revealed Joker has actually been alive for centuries? I think it was one of the Snyder and Capullo ones
Was that just a feint or real?
Ugh.., End Game. Snyder walked into Midtown Comics, asking employees what customers thought of his Batman stories. Very insecure writer.
On a side note, bet Joker is Jason Todd's father.
Yup. Terrible concept. Granted, the idea of Emotional Spectrum wielders i.e. The Lanterns wrecking the universe by abusing the spectrum isn't really a bad idea. Making emotions themselves a limited resource is, however, a bad idea.Wait what. I dont even. Wat?
I'd dig that pretty hard actually.On a side note, bet Joker is Jason Todd's father.