Lol. Now that is nostalgic.
Lol. Now that is nostalgic.
Yes but it teaches them a lesson and show others actions have consequences. What should be done instead in this instance if not something to this degree given the scale of the damage caused as highlighted in the OP?
When I was 16 I was sneaking beers and taking P Plates when I was roaming the streets with mates, I didn't make a DDoS program making over £386,000 in US dollars and more in bitcoins and sell that to criminals...biiiig difference.
The thing is, he created the tool but he wasn't the one responsible for the DDOS attacks on those servers they mention, it's like jailing the guy responsible that made a gun that was used by another person that commited the crime. Kinda weird, and 2 years in prison for this at this age, kinda excessive, there are perfect legal uses for this kinda of software.
The thing is, he created the tool but he wasn't the one responsible for the DDOS attacks on those servers they mention, it's like jailing the guy responsible that made a gun that was used by another person that commited the crime. Kinda weird, and 2 years in prison for this at this age, kinda excessive, there are perfect legal uses for this kinda of software.
Cmon now, he didn't make it for legal purposes and he knew perfectly well what his clients were gonna use it for. He himself even used it on his school just cause he was pissed off at them.The thing is, he created the tool but he wasn't the one responsible for the DDOS attacks on those servers they mention, it's like jailing the guy responsible that made a gun that was used by another person that commited the crime. Kinda weird, and 2 years in prison for this at this age, kinda excessive, there are perfect legal uses for this kinda of software.
He admitted to security breaches against his college while he was studying computer science. The attacks on West Herts College crashed the network, cost about £2,000 to investigate and caused incalculable damage to productivity, the court heard.
On one occasion in 2014, the college hacking affected 70 other schools and colleges, including Cambridge, Essex and East Anglia universities as well as local councils.
Mudds explanation for one of the attacks was that he had reported being mugged to the college, but claimed no action was taken.
Get fucked
Well, it's inevitable given where he's going.
The thing is, he created the tool but he wasn't the one responsible for the DDOS attacks on those servers they mention, it's like jailing the guy responsible that made a gun that was used by another person that commited the crime. Kinda weird, and 2 years in prison for this at this age, kinda excessive, there are perfect legal uses for this kinda of software.
Yeah, he's going to have a lucrative career as a cyber security consultant after he gets out, most likely. Overall, that will be good, though, as his talent won't go to waste and will instead be used to make things better.2 years is absolutely nothing, finding a job for him is going to be piss easy since he created the technology to bring the gaming giants to their knees. This work of his forced a lot of companies to reassess their digital security and cost them millions of dollars.
I'll agree that he's not the only one responsible for the attacks and his clients also bare some responsibility, but to absolve him completely of it is ludicrous when he rented out the botnet as a service to his clients, marketed it to gamers, was aware of what it was being used for, and by his own admission did not care how his clients used it.Still, he was not the main responsible for the DDOS that happened to Microsoft or Sony.
He went on to rent the use of the malware to anyone who cared to pay for it. His prices, according to court reporters from the Central News Agency, ranged between $3 for up to 100 seconds per month to 30,000 seconds over five years for £309.99, echoing popular as-a-service cloud pricing models.
Mudd had even offered free 60-second DDoS attacks in a try before you buy scheme.
.......
Mudd initially claimed that he had created Titanium Stressor for stress testing Minecraft servers and that it had got out of hand. He later admitted its true purpose. Ben Cooper, his defence barrister, blamed his behaviour on the relentless bullying he had suffered at school as a result of his Aspergers Syndrome.
He was looking to form friendships in the community which he couldnt do in real life, but he was very successful in doing it in the online community, Cooper told the Old Bailey on Mudds behalf.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/25/british_malware_author_2_years_jail_titanium_stresser/
'On one occasion, the defendant falsely arranged for a legitimate website to be linked to the TitaniumStresser so PayPal would wrongly refuse to accept payments from them.'
Investigators looked at Mudd's Skype chats, which showed he knew his programme was being used for the attacks, the prosecutor said.
After one user complained someone was using it for attacks, he replied 'I don't care', Mr Polnay said.
http://www.*****************/news/article-4432646/Teenage-hacker-16-makes-400-000-faces-jail.html
The thing is, he created the tool but he wasn't the one responsible for the DDOS attacks on those servers they mention, it's like jailing the guy responsible that made a gun that was used by another person that commited the crime. Kinda weird, and 2 years in prison for this at this age, kinda excessive, there are perfect legal uses for this kinda of software.
I assume, but might be wrong, it was cause he rented out the botnet and sold access to it as a service. I'd like to think that if a firearm store offered hired guns for crime they would be prosecuted.Why is him the one getting sentenced and not whoever used his tools? Wouldn't that be pretty much like firearms?
The thing is, he created the tool but he wasn't the one responsible for the DDOS attacks on those servers they mention, it's like jailing the guy responsible that made a gun that was used by another person that commited the crime. Kinda weird, and 2 years in prison for this at this age, kinda excessive, there are perfect legal uses for this kinda of software.
Why is him the one getting sentenced and not whoever used his tools? Wouldn't that be pretty much like firearms?
The software is crafted, tooled, marketed, and sold as a specific type of use service.
People buying this thing are not going to use it legally.
No, because a gun isn't sold with one illegal action as it's intended sole purpose.
This software is sold specifically to DDOS.
Mudd, from Kings Langley in Hertfordshire, pleaded guilty to one count of committing unauthorised acts with intent to impair the operation of computers; one count of making, supplying or offering to supply an article for use in an offence contrary to the Computer Misuse Act; and one count of concealing criminal property.
2 years seems lenient for causing tens of millions of dollars in damage to organizations ranging from schools to ISPs. On the other hand, the States would probably take it too far in the other direction. OH WELL.
I mean wouldn't helping people with those skills be a good thing?Hard to get excited about 2 years. He'll walk out of jail directly into a 6-figure consulting job.
2 years is absolutely nothing, finding a job for him is going to be piss easy since he created the technology to bring the gaming giants to their knees. This work of his forced a lot of companies to reassess their digital security and cost them millions of dollars.
£386,000 (who knows how much in damages) and 2 years jail.
Crime pays.
Wait. He keeps the money? Once he gets out he is probably gauranteed to make more money no? Dude seems like he's quite smart.
300 grand for getting pounded in the asshole daily for two years non stop.
Would you do it?
His parents should get some too.
Well, it's inevitable given where he's going.
I know that this is a common stereotype about prison, but stop. Prison does not equal 2 years of anal rape. It's brain dead and quite a bit homophobic to even suggest that this is the case.
The thing is, he created the tool but he wasn't the one responsible for the DDOS attacks on those servers they mention, it's like jailing the guy responsible that made a gun that was used by another person that commited the crime. Kinda weird, and 2 years in prison for this at this age, kinda excessive, there are perfect legal uses for this kinda of software.
As long as it didn't directly cause physical harm to people then 2 years is fucking ridiculous.
2 years of getting ass raped? Fucking no way.
If he's doing shit like swatting or ddos attacking hospitals then sure.
If it's just being an online shit stain, then fuck that shit.
Yes. Reading the article it seems this could set a scary precedent for anyone writing security related software.
No you're absolutely right it doesn't just include rape. It also includes physical violence, extortion, drug addiction and god knows what else.
It's really not brain dead, go and watch that Miami Mega Jail documentary by Louis Theroux. You have to go rounds with people in your cell.
And I assume this guy is a bit of a nerd. People like that get used as currency in prison.
300 grand for getting pounded in the asshole daily for two years non stop.
Would you do it?
He was sentenced in the UK, I don't quite think a documentary about US jail system is relevant for the case being discussed on this thread.
Oh thats a bit better then, I must of glossed over that part.
If it was an American prison then yeah, gg.
I just get uncomfortable people going to prison because they attacked a machine that creates money.
Prison in my eyes should be for those that cause direct and physical harm to others. Violent types, rapists, true criminals.
Something like this, I just don't like the precedent. I understand the why I just don't like it.
I assume, but might be wrong, it was cause he rented out the botnet and sold access to it as a service. I'd like to think that if a firearm store offered hired guns for crime they would be prosecuted.
No, because a gun isn't sold with one illegal action as its intended sole purpose.
This software is sold specifically to DDOS.