it shoots lighting and melts their skin off. hit a guy with it twice and they are pretty much gone.vitaminwateryum said:Played NG+ with some buddies and got and turned in the brown skull. Picked the orange one up on my first playthrough but had no idea what to do with it. Apparently I can craft a glove that shoots force lightning. Copacetic.
wwm0nkey said:it shoots lighting and melts their skin off. hit a guy with it twice and they are pretty much gone.
Also it knocks down thugs so you can stop their head in.
When you hit Act II and get to that building (not the storage shed) with the other survivors, there is a room in the far right that has champagne in the refrigerator, just exit the building and repeat 5 times.vitaminwateryum said:This sounds incredible. Now I just need to go replay bits of the hotel part for some champagne to get diamonds.
vaelic said:Is it just me or having to constantly go in your inventory to swap out broken weapons get tedious?
If they don't use the same scale and metacritic doesn't take that into account, then yes, ban them.Ledsen said:So their average is close to the actual average on their scale? Oh no, how horrible! They don't use the 7-10 scale, ban them now!
Enco said:If they don't use the same scale and metacritic doesn't take that into account, then yes, ban them.
Nobody cares for what scale they use. Their scores destroy the normal ratings so they shouldn't be counted.
I don't understand how you think a different scoring system should be counted along with normal scoring systems.
Never really visited Edge much but from what I've seen, they suck.
Should have made clear that I don't care for metacritic or scores (for the most part).MMaRsu said:LOL y'all caring too fucking much about metacritic. Ugh, who gives a shit? Just play the game and have fun. Oh noez scores aint correct let me just throw a hissy fit.
And Edge is one of the best gaming magazines out there, their reviews are usually very good and spot on. Although I also don't always agree with the scores, they are fair most of the time.
Ledsen said:So their average is close to the actual average on their scale? Oh no, how horrible! They don't use the 7-10 scale, ban them now!
The M.O.B said:.- The girl in blue jeans who i can't even remember the name of was lame, even though the sad music played when she got shot off the roof, I could care less since there was zero character development in this game
The M.O.B said:- The antidote was fake? Why did it turn Ryder into zombie?
The M.O.B said:- Gameplay was awesome though, it wore a bit thin towards the end but the first 15 hours or so was a blast, I couldn't stop playing. The combat was what held this entire game together. Very satisfying to play.
What's a "normal" scoring system (hint: there isn't one)? Edge can and should do whatever they want. Metacritic is a fucking horrible abomination that shouldn't exist at all precisely because o this problem, but it is THEIR responsibility to make sure their score conversion reflects the actual opinion of the publication as best as it can. They don't. EDGE is one of, if not the most respected gaming publication in the world, so what you think about them in your self-confessed ignorance is completely irrelevant in this case.Enco said:If they don't use the same scale and metacritic doesn't take that into account, then yes, ban them.
Nobody cares for what scale they use. Their scores destroy the normal ratings so they shouldn't be counted.
I don't understand how you think a different scoring system should be counted along with normal scoring systems.
Never really visited Edge much but from what I've seen, they suck.
So if a game reviewer decides to use a 10 point scale and that 2 is stunning and 1 is awful, should they too be included in metacritic with a system they don't fit with?Ledsen said:What's a "normal" scoring system? Edge can and should do whatever they want. Metacritic is a fucking horrible abomination that shouldn't exist at all, but it is THEIR responsibility to make sure their score conversion reflects the actual opinion of the publication. EDGE is one of, if not the most respected gaming publication in the world, so what you think about them is pretty irrelevant in this case.
Whatever system a game reviewer decides to use, it is 100% the responsibility of metacritic to make sure they convert it correctly. If 5 is average, and you want to keep that idiotic 6-7 average, convert 5 to 65. The reason metacritic is such a horribly offensive site is precisely because they CANNOT accurately represent the opinions of dozens of subjective reviews, each with their own take on what the number or letter grades mean. And if they can't do that without removing reviews that "don't fit", they shouldn't exist at all. Which is the only logical conclusion. Don't ban EDGE, ban fucking metacritic.Enco said:So if a game reviewer decides to use a 10 point scale and that 2 is stunning and 1 is awful, should they too be included in metacritic with a system they don't fit with?
By all means make your own system but don't go expecting to fit in and be counted alongside different systems.
A normal system is one that 99% of reviewers use. It's known for the most part that 6 or 7 is average.
Ledsen said:Whatever system a game reviewer decides to use, it is 100% the responsibility of metacritic to make sure they convert it correctly. If 5 is average, and you want to keep that idiotic 6-7 average, convert 5 to 65. The reason metacritic is such a horribly offensive site is precisely because they CANNOT accurately represent the opinions of dozens of subjective reviews, each with their own take on what the number or letter grades mean. And if they can't do that without removing reviews that "don't fit", they shouldn't exist at all. Which is the only logical conclusion. Don't ban EDGE, ban fucking metacritic.
Whether MC or Edge fix it I don't care.Ledsen said:Whatever system a game reviewer decides to use, it is 100% the responsibility of metacritic to make sure they convert it correctly. If 5 is average, and you want to keep that idiotic 6-7 average, convert 5 to 65. The reason metacritic is such a horribly offensive site is precisely because they CANNOT accurately represent the opinions of dozens of subjective reviews, each with their own take on what the number or letter grades mean. And if they can't do that without removing reviews that "don't fit", they shouldn't exist at all. Which is the only logical conclusion. Don't ban EDGE, ban fucking metacritic.
ezekial45 said:The PS3 version is really sluggish in terms of framerate. Plus the texture pop in gets REALLY bad. Not to mention it's crashed on me after exiting a building.
It seems like the 360 version runs a bit better. I may be wrong though. Can anyone on the 360 care to comment?
Cider X said:Played 4 player online co-op last night on the 360. It runs just as shitty. Framerate can easily dip into 10-15 territory. Texture pop in is almost Mass Effect 1 levels of bad. Game is ok when playing with friends despite the poor tech though.
Truant said:Any way to slow down weapon degradation via config files or whatever? The rate currently in the game is unrealistic and not fun at all. Twice as slow would have been perfect.
It gives you a special developer blue print to make a weapon.robot said:I was in thelast night and found a pile of skulls with a red arrow painted above them. Any idea what it's for? Easter egg?sewers
What do I do, pick them up? I don't remember a prompt to grab them. Or was the blueprint in the same room. I got a magic wand blueprint but not sure when.wwm0nkey said:It gives you a special developer bloue print to make a weapon.
For example the brown skull in the first area of the game will get you the Power Glove which can knock back any enemy and tear off their flesh.
You are meant to pick up a skull of a particular color and place it on the white skulls, there are plenty of guides of where to get the skulls and where to place themrobot said:What do I do, pick them up? I don't remember a prompt to grab them. Or was the blueprint in the same room. I got a magic wand blueprint but not sure when.
Awesome, thanks - just found some more info.wwm0nkey said:You are meant to pick up a skull of a particular color and place it on the white skulls, there are plenty of guides of where to get the skulls and where to place them
During Act II the game picks up A LOT&Divius said:Dead Island just messed up my savegame. Was about 2,5 hours/10% in and now I have to start over. Still contemplating whether I should start again or just don't bother and uninstall, because while I enjoyed the game it's basically constantly the same thing and was getting boring. Go to point A, get mission to grab object/person, go to point B, grab object/person, return to point A. Rinse and repeat.
Does the game get better/more diverse after a while or does it stay the same?
dark10x said:Tried this on the PC and I kind of like it, but the framerate is bothering me a bit. According to FRAPS, I'm getting 60 fps, but the mouse and keyboard movement make it feel as if it's lower. Anyone else noticing something like this? No matter which settings I select, FRAPS always reports 60 fps, but it never actually LOOKS like 60 fps.
It's not like it's choppy, it just doesn't appear as smooth as it should. Still having fun, though.
wwm0nkey said:You are meant to pick up a skull of a particular color and place it on the white skulls, there are plenty of guides of where to get the skulls and where to place them
AEREC said:Is there any way to turn off the "player near you" notifications...Im pretty much playing in just singleplayer and dont care to join anyones game.
no this tool is bettermxgt said:Yeah it has a micro stuttering issue and you have to turn on filter keys to fix it until it's patched
http://game.downloadatoz.com/tutori...microstuttering-issue-caused-by-keyboard.html
Stitch said:
Yes there are options to do it in the default_levels.xml file I believe it is. I did this as well because the rate is ridiculous.Truant said:Any way to slow down weapon degradation via config files or whatever? The rate currently in the game is unrealistic and not fun at all. Twice as slow would have been perfect.
anddo0 said:I'd like to know this as well. I've even been "sucked" into other players games unwillingly... Nothing sucks more than when you're shifting through your inventory one moment, and then next thing you know you're in someone else's game. I often have to quit out and re-load, causing me to lose mission progress (some side quest reset if you don't complete them before logging out).
I now want to play Dead Island like this lolAutofokus said:
anddo0 said:I'd like to know this as well. I've even been "sucked" into other players games unwillingly... Nothing sucks more than when you're shifting through your inventory one moment, and then next thing you know you're in someone else's game. I often have to quit out and re-load, causing me to lose mission progress (some side quest reset if you don't complete them before logging out).
ironcreed said:Just go into options and put it on single player mode.